Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr T H Krishnadas vs M/S Form Space Reality Llp
2024 Latest Caselaw 755 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 755 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Mr T H Krishnadas vs M/S Form Space Reality Llp on 9 January, 2024

Author: K.Natarajan

Bench: K.Natarajan

                                                 -1-
                                                               NC: 2024:KHC:1041
                                                         CRL.P No. 13641 of 2023




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024

                                               BEFORE
                              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
                              CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13641 OF 2023
                      BETWEEN:

                      MR. T H KRISHNADAS
                      PROPRIETOR,
                      AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
                      M/S BERRYZ FASHION HOUSE,
                      NO.3347/A, 3RD FLOOR, 13TH MAIN,
                      HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR,
                      BENGALURU - 560 008.
                                                                   ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. GIRISH, ADVOCATE FOR
                          SRI. KAPIL DEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      M/S FORM SPACE REALITY LLP
                      REPRESENTED BY ITS DESIGNATED PARTNER,
                      MR. HEMANSHU M SHAH,
Digitally signed by
VEDAVATHI A K         HAVING OFFICE AT NO.51,
Location: High        2ND MAIN ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM,
Court of Karnataka
                      BENGALURU - 560 008.
                                                                  ...RESPONDENT
                      (NOTICE TO RESPONDENT DISPENSED WITH)

                           THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
                      OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
                      06.10.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE LXIV ADDL. CITY
                      CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU AND THE
                      EXECUTION AND OPERATION OF IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON
                      THE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.836/2023, PENDING BEFORE THE
                      HONBLE LXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
                      BENGALURU.
                                 -2-
                                               NC: 2024:KHC:1041
                                         CRL.P No. 13641 of 2023




     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                              ORDER

Issuing notice to the respondent is dispensed with.

2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the

petitioner.

3. This petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., for

quashing the order dated 06.10.2023 for having rejecting the

application for extension of time to deposit the interim

compensation, as ordered by First Appellate Court under

Section 148 of Negotiable Instruments Act.1881, in

Crl.A.No.836/2023, pending on the file of LXIV Addl. City Civil

and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru.

4. Having heard the arguments and perused the records

which reveals ofcourse, the petitioner was convicted and

sentence to undergo imprisonment and pay fine as per the

judgment of Magistrate in C.C.No.5725/2019. Being aggrieved

by the conviction and sentence, the petitioner approached the

Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.836/2023, while suspending the

sentence, the First Appellate Court ordered on 05.07.2023 to

deposit 20% of the fine amount as compensation. However,

NC: 2024:KHC:1041

the petitioner not complied the order within 3 months, as

ordered by this court. However, the petitioner counsel filed the

application on 06.10.2023 for extension of another 30 days for

complying the order which was rejected by the First Appellate

Court.

5. As per the provision of 148 of NI Act, 60 days

provided for depositing the interim compensation. However, 30

days can be extended if sufficient cause is shown. The

petitioner if not deposited the amount within 90 days,

therefore, the First appellate court has no power to extend any

further time, beyond 90 days. Therefore, the First Appellate

court rightly rejected the application or memo filed by the

petitioner for extension of time. However, the learned counsel

for the petitioner submits the petitioner is ready to deposit the

amount if some time is extended. Ofcourse the petitioner

sought 30 days from 6.10.2023, now already more than 3

months lapsed. Therefore, if some more time is extended it

will meet the ends of justice. Even otherwise this amount is

recoverable as fine under Section 431 read with 421 of Cr.P.C.

Such being the case, the petition deserves to be allowed.

NC: 2024:KHC:1041

Accordingly, this petition is allowed.

The order of the First Appellate Court rejecting the

application or extension of time, is hereby set aside. One week

time is extended from the date of receipt of the copy of this

order, failing which the respondents are permitted to recover

the same, as per section 421 read with 431 of Cr.P.C.

Sd/-

JUDGE

AKV

CT:SK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter