Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 641 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:848-DB
RP No. 587 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
REVIEW PETITION NO. 587 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
SRI. M. BHIMA
S/O. LATE MALAVAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/AT LALAGHATTA VILLAGE,
CHANNAPATNA TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 511.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ASHWIN VAISH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally
signed by 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
SUMA B N DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Location: M.S. BUILDING,
High Court BANGALORE-560 001,
of Karnataka
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE COMMISSIONER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
BANGALORE-560 001.
3. THE DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
BANGALORE-560 001.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:848-DB
RP No. 587 of 2023
4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
(HIGHER EDUCATION),
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT,
RAMANAGARA-571 511.
5. THE SECRETARY
VAKKALIGARA SARVAJANIKA VIDHYARTHI NILAYA,
CHANNAPATNA TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT,
RAMANAGARA-571 511.
6. SRI. C. B. KUMAR
MAJOR, PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER,
VAKKALIGARA SARVAJANIKA VIDYARTHI NILAYA,
CHANNAPATNA TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 511.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.S. MAHENDRA, GA FOR R1 TO R5)
THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER HAS FILED THE
ABOVE REVIEW PETITION UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF THE
CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 12.06.2023
PASSED IN WRIT APPEAL NO. 209/2023 AND CONSEQUENTLY,
REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 12.06.2023 PASSED IN W.A. NO.
209 OF 2023 BY ALLOWING THIS REVIEW PETITION AS
PRAYED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:848-DB
RP No. 587 of 2023
ORDER
Referring to paragraph 5 of the Judgment dated
12.06.2023 passed in W.A.No.209/2023, learned counsel
for the review petitioner repeatedly argued before this
Court that as no material was presented before this Court
with regard to provision for reservation in the Notification
at Annexure-G, this Court committed an error while
passing the said order of which review is sought for.
2. Even now despite repeated queries by this Court,
learned counsel for the review petitioner is not in a
position to invite our attention to notification wherein it is
stated the post of Physical Education teacher is kept
reserved for a particular reserve category candidate.
3. Learned counsel for review petitioner however
sought to rely upon two additional documents one of which
is a report and other one is a Gazette Notification. None
of these documents satisfy the requirement of the query
posed by us now and in our original order. Review petition
NC: 2024:KHC:848-DB
is thoroughly merit less. No case is made out for review.
Accordingly review petition is dismissed.
Pending applications stands disposed of.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SBN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!