Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 509 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:703
CRP No. 598 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.598 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. M/S. SLV PETROLEUM
NANDANAGENAHALLI,
N.H.7 ROAD, NEAR PERESANDRA,
CHIKKABLLAPURA TALUK-562 104
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROP.
SRI P.V. ANAND
S/O LATE P.V. VENKATESH,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI MOHANA CHANDRA P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally 1. SRI N. VENKATESH
signed by V S/O N. NARASIMHAIAH,
MANJUSHA
BAI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
Location: R/AT SUBBARAYNAPETE,
High Court of WARD NO.16, CHIKKABALLAPURA TOWN
Karnataka CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562 101.
...RESPONDENT
(NOTICE TO RESPONDENT HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE
COURT ORDER DATED 16.11.2023.)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO EXAMINE THE CORRECTNESS,
LEGALITY AND PROPRIETY OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
02.08.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF 1ST ADDITIONAL
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:703
CRP No. 598 of 2023
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHICKBALLAPURA IN MIS.
CASE NO.28/2022 AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED 02.08.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF 1ST
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC.,
CHICKBALLAPURA IN MIS. CASE NO.28/2022 AND BY
ALLOWING THE PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE
MIS. CASE NO.28/2022 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THROUGH
PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1. The petitioner in the instant Civil Revision Petition has
challenged the order dated 02.08.2023 passed by the Court of I
Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, at Chikkaballapura in
Misc.No.28/2022 wherein the exparte judgment and decree
passed in O.S.No.146/2018 has been set aside on the ground
that the respondent herein was not served with the Court
notice.
2. The reasoning given in Misc.No.28/2022 for allowing the
same is that the petitioner herein instituted O.S.No.146/2018
against the respondent herein for recovery of money and gave
his address as 'No.577, Chikkaballapura Town, Chikkaballapura
Taluk', whereas the address of the respondent herein was
"Ward No.16, Subbarayanapete, Chikkaballapura Town. On the
said ground, the trial Court has come to the conclusion that due
NC: 2024:KHC:703
notice has not been served on the respondent herein and
accordingly, Misc.No.28/2022 was allowed and
O.S.No.146/2018 was restored to file.
3. I do not see any error in the order passed in
Misc.No.28/2022.
4. However, taking note of the fact that the original suit was
instituted in the year 2018, respondent herein is directed to co-
operate for early disposal of the suit and the trial Court shall
dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible.
5. Subject to the aforesaid observation, the Civil Revision
Petition is hereby dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
VMB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!