Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Veerabhdrayadhav vs Ningappa
2024 Latest Caselaw 35 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 35 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Veerabhdrayadhav vs Ningappa on 2 January, 2024

Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Bench: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

                                               -1-
                                                           NC: 2024:KHC:127
                                                       MFA No. 6732 of 2018




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                           DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
                                            BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
                   MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6732 OF 2018 (MV-I)

                   BETWEEN:

                   VEERABHDRAYADHAV
                   S/O RAJANNA,
                   AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
                   MECHANIC, JOGIMATTI ROAD,
                   CHITRADURGA TOWN
                                                                 ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. VIJAYA M N, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:
                   1.    NINGAPPA
                         S/O DURUGAPPA,
                         AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
                         RC OWNER OF MOTOR CYCLE,
                         BEARING REG NO.KA-06-V-2662
                         GOWRASAMUDRA,
                         THALUK HOBLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK
Digitally signed
by RAMYA D         2.    B.M.RAVI
Location: HIGH           S/O MANJUNATHA,
COURT OF                 AGRICULTURIST,
KARNATAKA
                         BHUVANAHALLI, MANANGI POST,
                         SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT
                                                              ...RESPONDENTS
                   (R1 AND R2 NOTICE SERVED)
                        THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
                   JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23/03/2018, PASSED IN MVC
                   NO.499/2017, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
                   MACT, CHALLAKERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION
                   FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
                   COMPENSATION.
                                  -2-
                                                        NC: 2024:KHC:127
                                              MFA No. 6732 of 2018




     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                              JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the appellant/claimant

challenging the judgment and award dated 23.03.2018

passed in MVC No.499/2017 on the file of Senior Civil Judge

and MACT, Challakere, seeking enhancement of

compensation awarded by the Tribunal as well as

contributory negligence attributed at 20% on the

appellant/claimant.

2. The factum of accident, injuries sustained by the

appellant/claimant are not in dispute.

3. Heard the arguments of learned Advocates

appearing for both parties and perused the records.

4. The Tribunal has granted a global compensation

of Rs.20,000/- and attributed 25% gross negligence on the

part of appellant/claimant. The accident is between the

motorcycle bearing registration No.KA-16-EA-1297, which is

being driven by the friend of claimant was hit by another

NC: 2024:KHC:127

motorcycle bearing registration No.KA-06-V-2662 coming

from opposite direction. The accident is head on collision

near to middle of road. Therefore, the Tribunal is correct in

holding that it is the case of contributory negligence

between both the motorcycles. In this regard, the finding of

fact arrived at by the Tribunal is found to be correct.

5. But as far as determination of compensation is

concerned, the Tribunal is erroneous. Considering the

nature of injuries and disability sustained by the claimant,

from the medical records it is proved that the claimant has

suffered fracture of left tibia, fibula right leg and fracture of

metatarsal bone of right leg. The claimant was working as a

mechanic and was earning an income of Rs.25,000/- per

month for maintenance of family. Therefore, compensation

of Rs.30,000/- is awarded towards 'pain and suffering'.

6. The claimant has produced Exs.P-6 to P-22 -

medical bills and Exs.P-23 to P-27 - prescriptions produced

by the claimant claiming compensation of Rs.1,17,000/- for

his medical expenses and hospitalisation charges, but the

NC: 2024:KHC:127

Tribunal has not granted any compensation towards medical

expenses. Accordingly, a compensation of Rs.1,17,000/- is

awarded towards medical expenses and hospitalisation

charges.

7. Further, a compensation of Rs.50,000/- is

awarded under the head 'loss of amenities'.

8. Thus, in all, the appellant/claimant is entitled to

total compensation as follows:

Sl.              Particulars                 Amount
No.                                           in Rs.
 1     Pain and sufferings                       30,000/-
 2     Medical expenses                        1,17,000/-
 3     Loss of amenities                         50,000/-
                    Total                     1,97,000/-


9. The Tribunal has awarded a global compensation

of Rs.20,000/-, but the appellant/claimant is entitled to total

compensation of Rs.1,97,000/-. Hence, the appellant/

claimant is entitled to compensation of Rs.1,97,000/- along

with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition till the

date of realisation as against global compensation of

NC: 2024:KHC:127

Rs.20,000/- along with interest at the rate of 9% p.a.

awarded by the Tribunal.

10. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

i. Appeal is allowed-in-part.

ii. The impugned judgment and award dated

23.03.2018 in MVC No.499/2017 passed

by the Senior Civil Judge and MACT,

Challakere, is modified to the extent that

the appellant/claimant is entitled to

compensation of Rs.1,97,000/- along with

the rate of interest at 6% per annum from

the date of petition till the date of

realization instead of 9% p.a. interest

granted by the Tribunal.

iii. No order as to costs.

iv. The appellant/claimant is not entitled for

interest for the delay period of 31 days in

filing the appeal.

NC: 2024:KHC:127

v. Registry is directed to transmit the TCR

along with copy of this order to the

Tribunal forthwith.

vi. Draw award accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

DR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter