Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shantha Bai And Anr vs Bhimrao And Anr
2024 Latest Caselaw 184 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 184 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Shantha Bai And Anr vs Bhimrao And Anr on 3 January, 2024

Author: B.M.Shyam Prasad

Bench: B.M.Shyam Prasad

                                                  -1-
                                                        NC: 2024:KHC-K:59-DB
                                                          MFA No.201424 of 2019




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                          KALABURAGI BENCH

                              DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2024

                                               PRESENT

                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD
                                                  AND
                           THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA


                             MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.201424 OF 2019 (MV-D)


                      BETWEEN:


                      1.   SHANTHA BAI
                           W/O GANPATHI @ GANPATHRAO
                           AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD

                      2.   GANPATHI @ GANPATHRAO
                           S/O AMBAJI
                           AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE

Digitally signed by
SWETA KULKARNI
                           BOTH R/O DHANNURA-H,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
                           TQ: BHALKI, DIST: BIDAR - 584 101
KARNATAKA

                                                                  ...APPELLANTS

                      (BY SRI. BABU H. METAGUDDA, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.   BHIMRAO S/O PANDURANGH JADHAV
                           AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS
                           R/O. A/P MEDANKAR WADI,
                           TQ: KHED, DIST: PUNE
                           M.S.PIN CODE NO.-410 501.
                                    -2-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC-K:59-DB
                                           MFA No.201424 of 2019




2.   THE MANAGER
     TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.
     DIVISIONAL OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR, JPX DEVI,
     ARCADE PLOT NO.69, MILLERE ROAD,
     BANGALORE PIN CODE NO.-584 101.
                                         ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI S.S. ASPALLI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH V/O. DATED 15.07.2021)

      THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR
VEHICLES ACT, 1988 PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND
MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23.07.2018
PASSED IN M.V.C.NO.213/2016 BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
AND ADDITIONAL MACT AT BHALKI AND ENHANCE THE
COMPENSATION FROM RS.9,24,000/- WITH 6% INTEREST TO
RS.44,50,000/- WITH 12% INTEREST.

      THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
B.M.SHYAM PRASAD J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                           JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the claimants in MVC

No.213/2016 on the file of the Addl. MACT, Bhalki [for

short, 'the Tribunal']. The claimants have impugned the

Tribunal's judgment and award dated 23.07.2018, and the

Tribunal by this impugned judgment and award has granted

a total sum of Rs.9,24,000/- as compensation under the

following heads:

NC: 2024:KHC-K:59-DB

1. Loss of dependency Rs.8,64,000/-

2. Love and affection Rs.20,000/-

3. Transportation of body and Rs.20,000/-

funeral expenses

4. Loss of estate Rs.20,000/-

Total Rs.9,24,000/-

2. The appellants have lost their son Sri Maruthi,

who was undergoing All India Trade Training (AITT)

conducted under the aegis of National Council for Vocational

Training, in a road accident on 23.09.2015 while he was

riding his two-wheeler. This accident, as opined by the

Tribunal, is because of the rash and negligent driving by the

driver of the offending vehicle viz., Tempo bearing

Reg.No.MH-14/EM-4066 which as of the relevant date was

insured with the second respondent - the Insurer.

3. Sri Babu H. Metagudda, the learned counsel for

the appellants, submits that the Tribunal has taken

Sri Maruthi's notional income in a sum of Rs.8,000/- per

month and capitalized the loss of dependency without

adding future prospects. Sri Babu H. Metagudda, while

urging that there must enhancement under the conventional

heads, canvasses that in the light of the evidence on record,

NC: 2024:KHC-K:59-DB

more particularly the marks sheet and other educational

records [Ex.P7 to P12], it is undeniable that Sri Maruthi had

undergone vocational training and this establishes that he

was employed, as contended by the appellants, with All

India Trade Training.

4. On the other hand, Sri S.S. Aspalli, the learned

counsel for the Insurer, submits that the appellants have

produced documents to show that the Sri Maruthi has

undergone vocational training, but they have not placed any

evidence to establish that the deceased was indeed

employed, and as such, the Tribunal has rightly taken the

notional income at Rs.8,000/- per month. As regards the

addition towards future prospects, Sri S.S. Aspalli cannot

persuade this Court to conclude that such addition must be

refused as it is now settled that the dependents of the

victims of road accident will be entitled for future prospects.

5. In the light of these submissions, the question for

consideration is:

NC: 2024:KHC-K:59-DB

Whether there must be enhancement in compensation granted to the appellants on the heads of loss of dependency and conventional heads.

6. Sri Maruthi was aged 18 years as of the date of

the accident as could be seen from the academic records

[the marks sheets -Ex.P9 to P12]. The Tribunal, based on

the charge-sheet filed, has concluded that the deceased was

aged 23 years. This may not be significant in itself insofar

as the multiplier to be applied but the age of the deceased

and the vocational training undergone by him show that he

was qualified. The notional income of Rs.8,000/- per month

is taken in cases where there is no proof of income, and in

the present case when it is established that Sri Maruthi was

aged 18 years old as of the date of the accident and had

undergone vocational training, this Court is of the

considered view that just compensation will be when the

notional income is taken at Rs.10,000/- per month.

7. There has to be addition of 40% of this income

towards future prospects in view of the decision of the

NC: 2024:KHC-K:59-DB

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance

Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors1. The loss of

dependency, after deducting 50% of the income of

Rs.10,000/- per month towards personal expenses with the

addition of 40% towards future prospects when capitalized

by the appropriate multiplier of 18, will be in a sum of

Rs.15,12,000/- as determined in the following manner:

               Description                    By this Court
        Annual Income                         Rs.1,20,000/-
        Addition of 40% towards
        future prospects to the               Rs.1,68,000/-
        annual income

        Deduction of 50% towards
                                               Rs.84,000/-
        personal expenses


        Loss of Dependency                    Rs.15,12,000/-

In addition, the appellants, who are parents of Sri Maruthi,

would be entitled to a sum of Rs.70,000/- under

conventional heads viz., love and affection, transportation of

1 (2017) 16 SCC 680

NC: 2024:KHC-K:59-DB

dead body, funeral expenses and loss of estate. Thus, the

appellants would be entitled for a total sum of

Rs.15,82,000/- as compensation, as detailed below:

                           By Tribunal              By this Court
        Description

    Loss of                Rs.8,64,000/-
                                                     Rs.15,12,000/-
    dependency
    Love and affection      Rs.20,000/-
    Transportation of       Rs.20,000/-
                                                        Rs.70,000/-
    body and funeral
    expenses
    Loss of estate          Rs.20,000/-
                                       Total         Rs.15,82,000/-


In the light of the above, the enhancement in compensation

will be in a sum of Rs.6,58,000/- [Rs.15,82,000/- -

Rs.9,24,000/-].

For the foregoing, the following:

ORDER

[i] The appeal is allowed in part modifying the

impugned judgment and award dated

23.07.2018 in MVC No.213/2016 and

granting an enhanced compensation of

Rs.6,58,000/-.

NC: 2024:KHC-K:59-DB

[ii] The second respondent - Insurer shall

deposit the enhanced compensation along

with interest at the rate of 6% p.a. within a

period of eight weeks [8] from the date of

receipt of a certified copy of this order.

[iii] The Tribunal's order as regards

apportionment, deposit and disbursement

remains unmodified.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

BL

CT;VK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter