Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5284 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:1682
CRL.A No. 200143 of 2021
C/W CRL.A No. 200136 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 200143 OF 2021 (378)
C/W
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 200136 OF 2021(378)
IN CRL.A. NO.200143 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
ZAKIRA BEGUM D/O SAMIUDDIN
AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: TAILORING/HOUSEHOLD,
R/O H.NO. 11-4262 MSK MILL,
JEELANABAD KALABURAGI-585103.
Digitally signed
by SHILPA R ...APPELLANT
TENIHALLI (BY SRI V. M. ASHRIT, ADVOCATE)
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA AND:
HASEENA BEGUM D/O SHAIKH M.D HUSSAIN
AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: LIBRARIAN,
R/O H-NO 11-6877, SHAH JEELANI DARGA,
KALABURAGI
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI AVINASH A. UPLAONKAR,ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:1682
CRL.A No. 200143 of 2021
C/W CRL.A No. 200136 of 2021
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S. 378 (4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL DATED
17/3/2021 IN CC.NO.5629/2016 PASSED BY THE IIND
ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KALABURAGI. AND
CONVICT THE RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCES U/S 138 AND
142 OF THE N.I ACT.
IN CRL.A. NO.200136 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
JAKIRA BEGUM D/O SAMIUDDIN
AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: TAILORING/HOUSEHOLD,
R/O H.NO. 11-4262 MSK MILL,
JEELANABAD KALABURAGI-585103.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. V. M. ASHRIT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
HASEENA BEGUM D/O SHAIKH M. D HUSSAIN
AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: LIBRARIAN,
R/O H.NO. 11-6877, DARGA,
KALABURAGI.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI AVINASH A. UPLAONKAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S. 378 (4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL DATED
17/3/2021 IN CC.NO.3406/2016 PASSED BY THE IIND
ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT KALABURAGI. AND
CONVICT THE RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCES U/S 138 AND
142 OF THE N.I ACT.
THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:1682
CRL.A No. 200143 of 2021
C/W CRL.A No. 200136 of 2021
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent in both
matters.
2. The records disclose that all along the time was
sought on behalf of the appellant herself. These appeals
are filed against the judgment of acquittal for the offence
punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments
Act (in short NI Act). Though the appeals are pending
from the year 2021, the appellant has not taken any
interest in prosecuting these matters. Hence, it appears
that the appellant/complainant is not interested in
prosecuting these matters.
3. Hence, both appeals are dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NJ
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!