Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4820 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:6740
MFA No. 733 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.733 OF 2019 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
THE MANAGER
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD,
BRANCH OFFICE, 1ST FLOOR,
TGMC BUILDING,
J C ROAD, TUMKUR CITY
NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER,
REGIONAL OFFICE,
LEO SHOPPING COMPLEX,
44/45, RESIDENCY ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560025
...APPELLANT
(BY SMT. HARINI SHIVANANDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. NARAYANAPPA
Digitally signed by JAI 37 YEARS,
JYOTHI J
Location: HIGH S/O LATE LINGAIAH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS,
RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 6 AMENDED CARRIED OUT
VIDE ORDER DATED 04.07.2022.
2. KUMAR
35 YEARS
S/O LATE LINGAIAH
3. SHIVANNA
31 YEARS
S/O LATE LINGAIAH
4. BYREGOWDA
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:6740
MFA No. 733 of 2019
29 YEARS
S/O LATE LINGAIAH
5. VIJAYALAKSHMI
25 YEARS
D/O LATE LINGAIAH
6. VIJAYAKUMAR
22 YEARS
S/O LATE LINGAIAH
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF DINNEPALYA VILLAGE,
KOTTIGEGOLLAHALLIL POST,
GULUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK - 572 104.
7. SMT. GANGALAKSHMAMMA
36 YEARS,
W/O SHIVAKUMAR
RESIDENTS OF DINNEPALYA VILLAGE,
KOTTIGEGOLLAHALLIL POST,
GULUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK - 572 104.
...RESPONDENTS
(R2 TO R7 NOTICE SERVED;
R2 TO R6 ARE TREATED AS LRS OF DECEASED R1)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED15.09.2018 PASSED IN MVC
NO.663/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND M.A.C.T., TUMKUR, AWARDING
COMPENSATION OF RS.5,55,500/-WITH INTEREST AT 6% P.A.
FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS ENTIRE REALIZATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:6740
MFA No. 733 of 2019
JUDGMENT
The appeal is filed by the insurance company praying
to reduce the quantum of compensation awarded by the
Tribunal.
2. The accident is occurred on 26.02.2014, but the
Tribunal has considered the notional income at Rs.4,500/-
per month, but as per the provisions of KSLSA the income
ought to have been taken at Rs.8,500/-.
3. Learned counsel for the insurance company
contended that the claimants are major children of the
deceased therefore 1/4th of income ought not to have been
deducted, but considering the facts and circumstances that
Tribunal has taken the notional income on lesser side,
then what ought to have been taken. Thus, compensation
awarded by the Tribunal is found to be just and proper.
Tribunal has even taken Rs.4,500/- per month as notional
income towards 'loss of future prospects in life'.
NC: 2024:KHC:6740
4. Therefore, considering all these facts and
circumstances and that the claimants have not preferred
any appeal for enhancement though the income is taken is
less, finding of the Tribunal in awarding compensation is
just and proper. Hence, no grounds are made out to
reduce the quantum of compensation. Accordingly, the
appeal filed by the insurance company is dismissed.
5. Amount in deposit, if any, shall be transmitted
to the jurisdictional Tribunal forthwith.
Sd/-
JUDGE
DR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!