Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4809 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:6710-DB
MFA.CROB No. 145 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
MFA CROSS OBJECTION NO. 145 OF 2021 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. NAGAMMA.T
W/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA
@HANUMATHAIAH.C
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
R/AT HIRITHURPE MADAKASIRA TALUK,
NOW R/AT KARIDASARAHALLI VILLAGE,
SIRA TALUK,
TUMAKUR DISTRICT-571 113.
2. SMT. THIMMAKKA
W/O LATE. CHIKKANNA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by R/AT KARIDASARAHALLI VILLAGE,
SHAKAMBARI
Location:
SIRA TALUK,
HIGH COURT TUMAKUR DISTRICT-571 113.
OF
KARNATAKA ...CROSS OBJECTORS
(BY SMT. SOWMYA R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. THGIRUMALA SWAMY ASSOCIATE
REP BY JAYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/AT MALLNAYAKANAHALLI,
GOLLARAHATTI, MIDIGESHI HOBLI,
MADHUGIRI TALUK,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 116.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:6710-DB
MFA.CROB No. 145 of 2021
2. SRI. GOPINATH
S/O RANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/AT DINNAMEDANAPALYA,
MADAKASIRA MANDAL,
MADAKASIRA TALUK,
ANANTHAPURA DISTRICT.
THE R-1 AND R-2 ARE THE MANAGING PARTNERS OF
THE TIPPER LORRY BEARING NO. KA 64-2550)
3. THE MANAGER, UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL
INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
K.V.D TOWER NO.7/3 2ND FLOOR,
KOLAR ROAD, (OLD MADRAS ROAD)
INDIRANAGARA,
BANGALORE-560 038.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ASHOKA.H ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.B.C. SHIVANNE GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR R3
R1 & R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS MFA CROB IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 22 OF
THE CPC READ WITH SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE
ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 20.09.2019
PASSED IN MVC NO. 1211/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT, SIRA. PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND
SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA CROB, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
DR.H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:6710-DB
MFA.CROB No. 145 of 2021
ORDER
Learned counsels from both side present.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants files the second set of the memo.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents
acknowledges the receipt of the copy of the memo and
submits his no objection to allow the memo.
4. Heard the learned counsels on both side on the
memo wherein, the cross-objector has sought for
dismissal of this MFA.Crob, as not pressed.
5. In view of the memo and supporting submissions
from both side, this MFA.Crob stands dismissed, as not
pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!