Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Secretary Agricultural Produce ... vs The Director Agricultural Produce ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 4787 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4787 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

The Secretary Agricultural Produce ... vs The Director Agricultural Produce ... on 16 February, 2024

Author: B.M.Shyam Prasad

Bench: B.M.Shyam Prasad

                                             -1-
                                               NC: 2024:KHC-K:1579-DB
                                                       WA No.200176 of 2022
                                                   C/W WA No.200173 of 2022
                                                       WA No.200178 of 2022
                                                       WA No.200180 of 2022
                                                       WA No.200183 of 2022
                                                       WA No.200184 of 2022
                                                       WA No.200199 of 2022


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                          DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                          PRESENT

                          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD
                                            AND
                        THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

                            WRIT APPEAL NO. 200176 OF 2022 (APMC)
                                             C/W
                            WRIT APPEAL NO. 200173 OF 2022 (APMC)
                            WRIT APPEAL NO. 200178 OF 2022 (APMC)
                            WRIT APPEAL NO. 200180 OF 2022 (APMC)
                            WRIT APPEAL NO. 200183 OF 2022 (APMC)
                            WRIT APPEAL NO. 200184 OF 2022 (APMC)
                            WRIT APPEAL NO. 200199 OF 2022 (APMC)

                   IN WRIT APPEAL NO.200176 OF 2022

                   BETWEEN:

                   THE SECRETARY
                   AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
                   BIDAR - 585 401.
Digitally signed
by SWETA                                                 ...APPELLANT
KULKARNI
Location: HIGH     (BY SRI KRUPA SAGAR PATIL, ADVOCATE)
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                   AND:

                   1.   THE DIRECTOR
                        AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
                        NO.16, 2ND RAJ BHAVAN ROAD
                              -2-
                               NC: 2024:KHC-K:1579-DB
                                       WA No.200176 of 2022
                                   C/W WA No.200173 of 2022
                                       WA No.200178 of 2022
                                       WA No.200180 of 2022
                                       WA No.200183 of 2022
                                       WA No.200184 of 2022
                                       WA No.200199 of 2022


      P.B. NO.5309, BANGALORE - 01.

2.    M/S MOHAMMAD RAHEMATH ALI
      VEGETABLE COMMISSION
      REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
      MOHAMMAD RAHEMATH ALI
      AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
      R/O SHOP NO.26 MAHEBOOB GUNJ
      A.P.M.C. MARKET YARD, BIDAR - 585 401.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI MAYA T.R., H.C.G.P. FOR R1)

       THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE
THE    ORDER    DATED   19.07.2022    IN   W.P.NO.201783/2022
(APMC) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ALLOW
THE WRIT APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC.

IN WRIT APPEAL NO.200173 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

THE SECRETARY
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
BIDAR - 585 401.
                                      ...APPELLANT

(BY SRI KRUPA SAGAR PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.    THE DIRECTOR
      AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
      NO.16, 2ND RAJ BHAVAN ROAD
      P.B. NO.5309, BANGALORE - 01.
                            -3-
                             NC: 2024:KHC-K:1579-DB
                                     WA No.200176 of 2022
                                 C/W WA No.200173 of 2022
                                     WA No.200178 of 2022
                                     WA No.200180 of 2022
                                     WA No.200183 of 2022
                                     WA No.200184 of 2022
                                     WA No.200199 of 2022


2.    M/S G.N. AND CO. COMMISSION AGENT
      REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
      GULAM NABI S/O ABDUL QAYUM
      AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
      R/O SHOP NO.33 MAHEBOOB GUNJ
      A.P.M.C. MARKET YARD, BIDAR - 585 401.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI MAYA T.R., H.C.G.P., FOR R1;
    SRI NAGARAJ PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

       THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE
THE    ORDER   DATED   19.07.2022   IN   W.P.NO.201777/2022
(APMC) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ALLOW
THE WRIT APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC.

IN WRIT APPEAL NO.200178 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

THE SECRETARY
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
BIDAR - 585 401.
                                      ...APPELLANT

(BY SRI KRUPA SAGAR PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.    THE DIRECTOR
      AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
      NO.16, 2ND RAJ BHAVAN ROAD
      P.B. NO.5309, BANGALORE - 01.

2.    M/S MD ZAHOOR
      VEGETABLE COMMISSION AGENT
                              -4-
                               NC: 2024:KHC-K:1579-DB
                                       WA No.200176 of 2022
                                   C/W WA No.200173 of 2022
                                       WA No.200178 of 2022
                                       WA No.200180 of 2022
                                       WA No.200183 of 2022
                                       WA No.200184 of 2022
                                       WA No.200199 of 2022


      REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
      MOHD. ZAHOOR S/O ABDUL AZIZ
      AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
      R/O SHOP NO.4, MAHEBOOB GUNJ
      APMC MARKET YARD, BIDAR - 585 401.
                                              ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI MAYA T.R., H.C.G.P. FOR R1)

       THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE
THE    ORDER   DATED   19.07.2022     IN   W.P.NO.201567/2022
(APMC) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ALLOW
THE WRIT APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC.

IN WRIT APPEAL NO.200180 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

THE SECRETARY
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
BIDAR - 585 401.
                                      ...APPELLANT

(BY SRI KRUPA SAGAR PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.    THE DIRECTOR
      AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
      NO.16, 2ND RAJ BHAVAN ROAD
      P.B. NO.5309, BANGALORE - 01.

2.    M/S ABDUL RAHMAN VEGETABLE COMMISSION
      REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
      ABDUL RAHMAN S/O ABDUL AZIZ
      AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
                              -5-
                               NC: 2024:KHC-K:1579-DB
                                       WA No.200176 of 2022
                                   C/W WA No.200173 of 2022
                                       WA No.200178 of 2022
                                       WA No.200180 of 2022
                                       WA No.200183 of 2022
                                       WA No.200184 of 2022
                                       WA No.200199 of 2022


    R/O SHOP NO.09, MAHEBOOB GUNJ
    A.P.M.C. MARKET YARD, BIDAR - 585 401.
                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MAYA T.R., H.C.G.P. FOR R1)

       THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE
THE    ORDER   DATED    19.07.2022     IN   W.P.NO.201782/2022
(APMC) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ALLOW
THE WRIT APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC.

IN WRIT APPEAL NO.200183 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

THE SECRETARY
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
BIDAR - 585 401.
                                      ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI KRUPA SAGAR PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.    THE DIRECTOR
      AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
      NO.16, 2ND RAJ BHAVAN ROAD
      P.B. NO.5309, BANGALORE - 01.

2.    M/S JANATA VEGETABLE COMMISSION AGENT
      REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
      ABDUL SALEEM S/O ABDUL SATTAR
      AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
      R/O SHOP NO.11 MAHEBOOB GUNJ
      A.P.M.C. MARKET YARD, BIDAR - 585 401.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI MAYA T.R., H.C.G.P., FOR R1)
                              -6-
                               NC: 2024:KHC-K:1579-DB
                                       WA No.200176 of 2022
                                   C/W WA No.200173 of 2022
                                       WA No.200178 of 2022
                                       WA No.200180 of 2022
                                       WA No.200183 of 2022
                                       WA No.200184 of 2022
                                       WA No.200199 of 2022


       THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE
THE    ORDER   DATED   19.07.2022     IN   W.P.NO.201704/2022
(APMC) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ALLOW
THE WRIT APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC.


IN WRIT APPEAL NO.200184 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

THE SECRETARY
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
BIDAR - 585 401.
                                      ...APPELLANT

(BY SRI KRUPA SAGAR PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.    THE DIRECTOR
      AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
      NO.16, 2ND RAJ BHAVAN ROAD
      P.B. NO.5309, BANGALORE - 01.

2.    M/S ABDUL JALEEL AND COMPANY
      REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
      ABDUL JALEEL S/O ABDUL KAREEM
      AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
      R/O SHOP NO.28 MAHEBOOB GUNJ
      A.P.M.C. MARKET YARD, BIDAR - 585 401.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI MAYA T.R., H.C.G.P. FOR R1)

       THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE
                              -7-
                               NC: 2024:KHC-K:1579-DB
                                       WA No.200176 of 2022
                                   C/W WA No.200173 of 2022
                                       WA No.200178 of 2022
                                       WA No.200180 of 2022
                                       WA No.200183 of 2022
                                       WA No.200184 of 2022
                                       WA No.200199 of 2022


THE    ORDER   DATED   19.07.2022     IN   W.P.NO.201780/2022
(APMC) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ALLOW
THE WRIT APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC.

IN WRIT APPEAL NO.200199 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

THE SECRETARY
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
BIDAR - 585 401.
                                      ...APPELLANT

(BY SRI KRUPA SAGAR PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.    THE DIRECTOR
      AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE
      NO.16, 2ND RAJ BHAVAN ROAD
      P.B. NO.5309, BANGALORE - 01.

2.    M/S Y.S.TRADING CO. COMMISSION AGENT
      REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
      MOHAMMAD YUNUS S/O ABDUL RAHEEM
      AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
      R/O SHOP NO.14 MAHEBOOB GUNJ
      A.P.M.C. MARKET YARD, BIDAR - 585 401.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI MAYA T.R., H.C.G.P. FOR R1)

       THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE
THE    ORDER   DATED   19.07.2022     IN   W.P.NO.201779/2022
                                  -8-
                                   NC: 2024:KHC-K:1579-DB
                                            WA No.200176 of 2022
                                        C/W WA No.200173 of 2022
                                            WA No.200178 of 2022
                                            WA No.200180 of 2022
                                            WA No.200183 of 2022
                                            WA No.200184 of 2022
                                            WA No.200199 of 2022


(APMC) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ALLOW
THE WRIT APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND ETC.

     THESE WRIT APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, B.M.SHYAM PRASAD J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                             JUDGMENT

The private respondents in these writ appeals have

filed their respective writ petitions impugning the orders

issued by the appellant for cancellation of the allotment of

corresponding plots on the ground that the allotment price

is not paid within time. These writ petitions have been

disposed of by similar but separate orders which are

impugned in these corresponding writ appeals. The writ

Court has allowed these writ petitions quashing the

appellant's order with directions that read as under:

"i) Out of the balance amount, a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- shall be paid by the petitioner to respondent no.2 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order;

NC: 2024:KHC-K:1579-DB

ii) The petitioner is granted six months time from today to pay the balance amount towards lease-cum- sale of the shop in question to respondent no.2 and he shall also pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as penalty to respondent no.2 along with the balance amount which is liable to be paid;

iii) It is made clear that the petitioner shall not be entitled for any further extension of time to pay the amount, and in the event, the petitioner fails to pay the arrears as directed by this Court herein above, respondents are liberty to take action in accordance with law."

It is seen from the records that similar directions

issued by the writ Court in W.P.No.201784/2022 are

impugned in W.A.No.200171/2022, and this writ appeal is

disposed of on 08.12.2022 considering the circumstances in

which the directions are issued. This Court's observations

in this order dated 08.12.2022 reads as follows:

"4. We are unable to find any fault or error in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. The order is passed considering the balance of equities as well as considering the peculiar circumstances of the case. As

- 10 -

NC: 2024:KHC-K:1579-DB

such in our opinion, the appeal is devoid of merits and deserves to be dismissed and the same is accordingly dismissed."

The learned counsel for the appellant does not contend

that the concerned respondents are differently placed. This

Court is in respectful agreement with the conclusion as

aforesaid, and therefore, no interference is called for in any

of these writ appeals. However, this Court must observe

that this disposal would not effect any course of action that

would be available to the appellant in terms of the directions

issued by the writ Court, if amount is not paid.

The appeals stand disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE SWK

Ct;Vk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter