Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4693 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:6576
RFA No. 2051 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2051 OF 2010 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SHARADAMMA,
D/O K. VEERABADRASHETTY,
W/O K. ANKASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/AT 7TH CROSS, EXTENSION
NANJANGUD TOWN,
MYSORE DIST.-571 301.
2. JAYAMMA,
D/O K. VEERABADRASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/AT MUDIGUNDA VILLAGE,
KOLLEGALA TALUK,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST.-571 313.
3. PUTTAMMA,
D/O K. VEERABADRASHETTY,
Digitally signed W/O LATE K. MADASHETTY,
by AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
ANNAPURNA G
R/AT KALALE VILLAGE,
Location: High
Court of NANJANGUD TALUK- 571 301.
Karnataka ...APPELLANTS
(BY SMT. N R PADMA & SRI K MOHAN, ADVOCATES [ABSENT])
AND:
1. NAGARAJASHETTY,
S/O VEERABADRASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/AT BRAMARAMBHA STREET,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:6576
RFA No. 2051 of 2010
D.NO. 871,
CHAMARAJNAGAR TOWN,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST. -571 313.
2. VEELOCHANAMMA,
S/O VENKATARAMANASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/AT BRAMARAMBHA STREET,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST. -571 313.
3. C.V. DASASHETTY,
S/O LATE VEERABADRASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS,
R/AT 11TH CROSS, EXTENSION
NANJANGUD TOWN,
MYSORE DIST. -571 301.
4. C.V. VENKATARAMANASHETTY,
S/O LATE VEERABADRASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS,
C/O SUNDERASHETTY,
R/AT MAMBAHALLI,
YALLANDOOR TALUK,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST. - 571 313.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI GIRISH B BALADARE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 [ABSENT];
R1, R3 & R4 ARE SERVED.)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE
1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
20.8.2010 PASSED IN O.S.32/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHAMARAJANAGAR,
DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE
POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:6576
RFA No. 2051 of 2010
JUDGMENT
None appear for the appellants as well as the
respondents.
2. Even on the previous occasion also, i.e. on
24-01-2024, none appeared for the appellants as well as
the respondents. Therefore, it appears that the appellants
are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the
appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
tsn*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!