Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ravi @ Vaddar Ravi vs The State Of Karnataka By
2024 Latest Caselaw 4513 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4513 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Ravi @ Vaddar Ravi vs The State Of Karnataka By on 14 February, 2024

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty

Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty

                                                   -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC-D:3574
                                                         CRL.RP No. 100067 of 2016




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                           DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                                BEFORE

                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

                        CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100067 OF 2016 (397)

                       BETWEEN:

                          RAVI @ VADDAR RAVI
                          S/O HULUGAPPA
                          AGE: 29 YEARS,
                          OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                          R/O: NEAR MUTTON MARKET,
                          CHAPPARADHALLI HOSAPETE,
                          BALLARI DIST.

                                                                      ...PETITIONER
                       (BY SRI. GIRISH S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)

                       AND:

ANNAPURNA                 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
CHINNAPPA                 ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
DANDAGAL                  PSI BADAVANE P.S
 Digitally signed by
                          HOSAPETE,
 ANNAPURNA
 CHINNAPPA
                          BALLARI DIST.
 DANDAGAL
 Date: 2024.02.19
 14:50:48 +0530                                                     ...RESPONDENT
                       (BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP)

                              THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.397
                       R/W 401 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ADMIT THE PETITION AND
                       CALL FOR RECORDS FORM THE BOTH COURTS BELOW AND
                       SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENTS; IN C.C.NO.778/2012 PASSED BY
                       THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSPET DATED.06.04.2015
                               -2-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC-D:3574
                                     CRL.RP No. 100067 of 2016




AND CONFIRMED BY THE III ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS
JUDGE,   BALLARY   (SITTING     AT    HOSPET)   IN   CRL.A.NO.
5055/2015 DATED 23.01.2016 BY ALLOWING THE REVISION
PETITION.


     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                         ORDER

1. This revision petition under Section 397 r/w 401 of

Cr.P.C., is filed with a prayer to set aside the judgment

and order of conviction and sentence dated 06.04.2015

passed by the Court of Principal Civil Judge and JMFC,

Hospet in C.C.No.778/2012 and the judgment and order

dated 23.01.2016 passed by the Court of III Addl. District

and Sessions Judge, Ballari (sitting at Hosapete) in

Crl.A.No.5055/2015.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the inception

submits that the petitioner was in custody for a period of

nearly five years in the present case and if the order of

sentence passed by the Trial Court for the offences

NC: 2024:KHC-D:3574

punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC is ordered

to run concurrently, the same would meet the ends of

justice.

4. Learned HCGP does not seriously oppose the said

submission. Learned HCGP points out from the record that

the petitioner was in custody from 31.10.2011 till

13.06.2015, the date on which the order on sentence was

passed by the Trial Court.

5. The petitioner has been convicted by the Trial Court

for the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of

IPC and he has been sentenced to undergo simple

imprisonment for a period of three years for each of the

aforesaid offences and also to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- for

each of the offence and in default, to undergo simple

imprisonment for a period of six months. The Trial Court

has observed that the sentence passed against the

accused shall run consecutively i.e., one after the expiry of

the other. It is trite that the sentences imposed by the

NC: 2024:KHC-D:3574

Courts are normally required to be ordered to run

concurrently. However, in the present case, the Trial Court

has directed that the sentences imposed shall run

consecutively without assigning any special reason for the

same. The Appellate Court also has failed to appreciate

this aspect of the matter and has confirmed the order on

sentence passed by the Trial Court. In my opinion, the

Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court were not justified

in ordering the sentences imposed on the accused to run

consecutively. Accordingly, the following:-

ORDER

(i) The Criminal Revision Petition is partly allowed.

(ii) The judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Courts below convicting the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC are confirmed.

(iii) The order of sentence is modified to the extent it states that the sentences imposed on the accused for the

NC: 2024:KHC-D:3574

offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC shall run consecutively and instead, it is ordered that the sentences shall run concurrently.

Sd/-

JUDGE

AC,DN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter