Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Xxxx vs Union Of India
2024 Latest Caselaw 3878 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3878 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Xxxx vs Union Of India on 8 February, 2024

Author: M.Nagaprasanna

Bench: M.Nagaprasanna

                                            -1-
                                                        NC: 2024:KHC:5328
                                                        WP No. 93 of 2024




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                     DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                           BEFORE
                     THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
                       WRIT PETITION NO. 93 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
              BETWEEN:

              1.    SMT. XXXX,
                    W/O SRI. XXXX,
                    AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.

              2.    SRI. XXXX,
                    S/O XXXX,
                    AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.

                    BOTH R/AT NO.10,
                    F2, SHRISTI RESIDENCY, SV LAYOUT,
                    SANJAYNAGAR,
                    BANGALORE - 560 094.
                                                           ...PETITIONERS
                 (BY SRI. GAUTAM S. BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by NAGAVENI      AND:
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA        1. UNION OF INDIA,
                     THROUGH MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY
                     WELFARE, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY,
                    NIRMAN BHAWAN,
                    NEW DELHI - 110 011.

              2.    KARNATAKA STATE ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE
                    TECHNOLOGY AND SURROGACY BOARD,
                    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
                    GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
                                   -2-
                                                   NC: 2024:KHC:5328
                                                  WP No. 93 of 2024




    VIKASA SOUDHA,
    BENGALURU - 560 001,
    REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
                                                     ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. H. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, DSGI FOR R1;
    SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R2)

       THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
NOTIFICATION DATED 14.03.23 BEARING NO.G.S.R. 179(E),
ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 (I.E DEPARTMENT OF MINISTRY
OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE) AS THE SAME IS ULTRA
VIRES    THE    CONSTITUTION        OF   INDIA,    THE    SURROGACY
(REGULATION) ACT, 2021 AND THE ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE
TECHNOLOGY (REGULATION ) ACT, 2021. A COPY OF THE SAID
NOTIFICATION IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-A AND
ETC.

       THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING,

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                                ORDER

The petitioners are before this Court, seeking the

following prayers:

"A. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ direction, order quashing the notification dated 14.03.2023 bearing no. G.S.R.179(E), issued by Respondent No.1 (i.e. Department of Ministry of Health and Family Welfare) as the same is ultra vires the Constitution of India, the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 and the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation)

NC: 2024:KHC:5328

Act, 2021. A copy of the said Notification is produced herewith as Annexure 'A'. B. Issue any other such appropriate order Writ or Directions as the Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice and equity."

2. Heard Sri. Gautam S. Bharadwaj, learned counsel

appearing for the petitioners, Sri. H. Shanthi Bhushan, learned

DSGI appearing for respondent No.1, Smt. Navya Shekhar,

learned AGA appearing for respondent No.2 and have perused

the material on record.

3. The relief sought by the petitioners in the subject

petition is identical to the one that was sought in

W.P.No.15824/2023, which is disposed by permitting surrogacy

on manifold reasons. The order passed in W.P.No.15824/2023,

disposed on 18.11.2023, reads as follows:

"(i) Writ Petition is allowed in part.

(ii) The challenge to the notification dated 14-03-2023 is left unanswered, as the challenge to it is pending consideration before the Apex Court.

(iii) For the reasons rendered in the course of the order, the notification dated 14-03-2023 is declared inapplicable to the case of the petitioners.

(iv) The petitioners are entitled to opt for surrogacy for the reasons rendered in the course of the order.

NC: 2024:KHC:5328

(v) The petitioners would become entitled to opt for surrogacy, subject to them fulfilling all other conditions and requirements under the statute, except the one that is in the notification dated 14- 03-2023.

(vi) In the light of the findings rendered in the course of the order, the Authorities cannot insist or direct the petitioners that the donor gamete cannot be made use of by the intending couple. The Authorities shall forthwith process the applications, if any and issue Eligibility Certificate/Essentiality Certificate, if the intending couple would fulfil all other conditions."

The aforesaid order was passed on account of the health

condition as prayed by the petitioners in the document

appended to the writ petition in the case at hand as well. The

medical condition of the petitioners are intending mother

through surrogacy are also the one that is considered in the

aforesaid writ petition. The medical certificate reads as follows:

             "This        is        to      certify    that
             Mrs     XXXX,       (UHID:101591875)   is    a

woman with absent uterus & ovaries from birth. Hence, she needs to have an egg donor & surrogate to get a baby."

Therefore, the issue stands covered on all its fours to the

judgment rendered by this Court in W.P.No.15824/2023.

4. For the very reasons rendered to allow surrogacy in

W.P.N.15824/2023, this petition deserves to succeed, and

granting of the same relief.

NC: 2024:KHC:5328

5. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:

ORDER

(i) Writ Petition is allowed-in-part.

(ii) The challenge to the notification dated 14-03-2023 is left unanswered, as the challenge to it is pending consideration before the Apex Court.

(iii) For the reasons rendered in the course of the order, the notification dated 14-03-2023 is declared inapplicable to the case of the petitioners.

(iv) The petitioners are entitled to opt for surrogacy for the reasons rendered in the course of the order.

(v) The petitioners would become entitled to opt for surrogacy, subject to them fulfilling all other conditions and requirements under the statute, except the one that is in the notification dated 14-03-2023.

(vi) In the light of the findings rendered in the course of the order, the Authorities cannot insist or direct the petitioners that the donor gamete cannot be made use of by the

NC: 2024:KHC:5328

intending couple. The Authorities shall forthwith process the applications, if any and issue Eligibility Certificate/Essentiality Certificate, if the intending couple would fulfill all other conditions.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SJK CT:SNN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter