Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Xxxx vs Union Of India
2024 Latest Caselaw 3872 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3872 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt Xxxx vs Union Of India on 8 February, 2024

Author: M.Nagaprasanna

Bench: M.Nagaprasanna

                                            -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC:5326
                                                    WP No. 29476 of 2023




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                      DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                        BEFORE
                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
                      WRIT PETITION NO. 29476 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
               BETWEEN:

               1.    SMT.XXXX
                     W/O XXXX
                     AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS.

               2.    SRI.XXXX
                     S/O XXXX
                     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.

                     BOTH 1 AND 2 ARE R/AT
                     #A-804, VAISHNAVI SPLENDOUR,
                     6TH CROSS, RMV 2ND STAGE,
                     BENGALURU,
                     KARNATAKA - 560 094.
                                                             ...PETITIONERS
Digitally signed (BY SRI. ABHIRAJ B. CHENGTI, ADVOCATE)
by NAGAVENI
Location: HIGH AND:
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                 1. UNION OF INDIA,
                     THROUGH MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND
                     FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAN BHAVAN,
                     NEW DELHI - 110 011.
                     (THROUGH ITS SECRETARY)

               2.    THE KARNATAKA STATE APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY,
                     ART AND SURROGACY ACT,
                     DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE,
                                -2-
                                             NC: 2024:KHC:5326
                                          WP No. 29476 of 2023




     AROGYA SOUDHA, BENGALURU,
     KARNATAKA - 560 023.
     (THROUGH ITS MEMBER SECRETARY).

3.   THE DISTRICT MEDICAL BOARD,
     CONSTITUTED UNDER SURROGACY (REGULATIONS)
     ACT, 2021,
     K.C. GENERAL HOSPITAL,
     MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU,
     KARNATAKA -5 60 003,
     (THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON)
                                      ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SADHANA S DESAI, CGC FOR R1;
    SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R2 AND R3)

      THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 14/03/2023 BEARING NO.
GSR.179(E) ISSUED BY R1 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE K AS
BEING    ULTRA       VIRES   THE     CONSTITUTION   OF   INDIA,
SURROGACY (REGULATIONS) ACT, 2021 AND ETC.

      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING,

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                              ORDER

The petitioners are before this Court, seeking the

following prayers:

"I. Issue Writ of Certiorari quashing the impugned Notification Dated 14.03.2023 bearing No. GSR.179(E) issued by Respondent No.1 produced at ANNEXURE K

NC: 2024:KHC:5326

as being ultra vires the constitution of India, Surrogacy (Regulations) Act, 2021.

II. Issue a Writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the respondent No. 2 & 3 to rectify the surrogacy certificate Dated 18.07.2023 issued in favour of petitioners produced at ANNEXURE L and allow them to go for surrogacy with donor eggs/Oocytes.

III. Issue such other writ/order/directions/relief as this Hon'ble court may deem fit to grant in the circumstances of the case."

2. Heard Sri. Abhiraj B. Chengti, learned counsel

appearing for the petitioners, Smt. Sadhana S. Desai, learned

CGC appearing for respondent No.1, Smt. Navya Shekhar,

learned AGA appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 and have

perused the material on record.

3. The relief sought by the petitioners in the subject

petition is identical to the one that was sought in

W.P.No.15824/2023, which is disposed by permitting surrogacy

on manifold reasons. The order passed in W.P.No.15824/2023,

disposed on 18.11.2023, reads as follows:

"(i) Writ Petition is allowed in part.

(ii) The challenge to the notification dated 14-03-2023 is left unanswered, as the challenge to it is pending consideration before the Apex Court.

NC: 2024:KHC:5326

(iii) For the reasons rendered in the course of the order, the notification dated 14-03-2023 is declared inapplicable to the case of the petitioners.

(iv) The petitioners are entitled to opt for surrogacy for the reasons rendered in the course of the order.

(v) The petitioners would become entitled to opt for surrogacy, subject to them fulfilling all other conditions and requirements under the statute, except the one that is in the notification dated 14- 03-2023.

(vi) In the light of the findings rendered in the course of the order, the Authorities cannot insist or direct the petitioners that the donor gamete cannot be made use of by the intending couple. The Authorities shall forthwith process the applications, if any and issue Eligibility Certificate/Essentiality Certificate, if the intending couple would fulfil all other conditions."

The aforesaid order was passed on account of the health

condition as prayed by the petitioners in the document

appended to the writ petition in the case at hand as well. The

medical condition of the petitioners are intending mother

through surrogacy are also the one that is considered in the

aforesaid writ petition. The medical certificate reads as follows:

" .....

The District Medical Board Examined the available medical reports on records of the intending couple (Husband / Wife) and hereby certify that the Mrs. XXXXl and Mr. XXXX satisfy the provision as per rule 14(c), (d) of The Surrogacy (Regulation) rules, 2022. In view of intending mother 46 years with Married life of 19 years with "History of multiple failed attempts of

NC: 2024:KHC:5326

infertility treatments (resent IVF tried on 22-5- 2022) it's an indication for Altruistic surrogacy procedure as an advanced treatment for infertility with their own gametes as per recent surrogacy amendment act of 14th march 2023."

(emphasis added)

Therefore, the issue stands covered on all its fours to the

judgment rendered by this Court in W.P.No.15824/2023.

4. For the very reasons rendered to allow surrogacy in

W.P.N.15824/2023, this petition deserves to succeed, and

granting of the same relief.

5. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:

ORDER

(i) Writ Petition is allowed-in-part.

(ii) The challenge to the notification dated 14-03-2023 is left unanswered, as the challenge to it is pending consideration before the Apex Court.

(iii) For the reasons rendered in the course of the order, the notification dated 14-03-2023 is declared inapplicable to the case of the petitioners.

NC: 2024:KHC:5326

(iv) The petitioners are entitled to opt for surrogacy for the reasons rendered in the course of the order.

(v) The petitioners would become entitled to opt for surrogacy, subject to them fulfilling all other conditions and requirements under the statute, except the one that is in the notification dated 14-03-2023.

(vi) In the light of the findings rendered in the course of the order, the Authorities cannot insist or direct the petitioners that the donor gamete cannot be made use of by the intending couple. The Authorities shall forthwith process the applications, if any and issue Eligibility Certificate/Essentiality Certificate, if the intending couple would fulfill all other conditions.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SJK CT:SNN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter