Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3552 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:5036
RFA No. 1725 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1725 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SMT. SUJATHA
D/O RAMOJI RAO
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.-4
NARAYANSWAMY LANE
KALASIPALYAM
BANGALORE 560002 ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. A V AMARNATHAN.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. REDDY BAI
W/O RAJA RAO
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.4
NARAYANASWAMY LANE
Digitally signed
by HEMALATHA KALASIPALYAM
A BANGALORE 560002.
Location: High
Court of 2. SMT SUSHEELA BAI
Karnataka W/O SHANKAR RAO
SINCE DEAD BY LR'S
SRI SRIDHAR RAO
S/O LATE SHANKAR RAO
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO-4
NARYANASWAMY LANE
KALASIPALYAM
BANGALORE-560002.
3. SRI SUNDAR RAO
S/O LATE SHANKAR RAO
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:5036
RFA No. 1725 of 2019
RESIDING AT NO.4
NARAYANASWAMY LANE
KALASIPALYAM
BANGALORE 560002.
4. SMT LAKSHMI BAI
W/O KRISHNOJI RAO
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.4
NARAYANASWAMY LANE
KALASIPALYAM
BANGALORE 560002.
5. SMT INDIRANI BAI
W/O JAYA RAJU
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.4
NARAYANASWAMY LANE
KALASIPALYAM
BANGALORE 560002.
6. SMT USHA RANI
W/O PRAKASH
SINCE DEAD BY LR'S
SRI SRINIVAS RAO
S/O LATE PRAKASH
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO-4
NARAYANASWAMY LANE
KALASIPALYAM
BANGALORE-560 002.
7. KUM. DEEPIKA
D/O LATE PRAKASH
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.4
NARAYANASWAMY LANE
KALASIPALYAM
BANGALORE-560 002.
8. SRI RAMOJI RAO
S/O LATE LAKSHMAN RAO
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.4
NARAYANASWAMY LANE
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:5036
RFA No. 1725 of 2019
KALASIPALYAM
BANGALORE 560002. ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G R LAKSHMIPATHI.,ADVOCATE FOR C/R6)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF
CPC.,AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.06.2019 PASSED ON IA
NO.3 IN EX.NO.2490/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XXV
ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE
DISMISSING THE IA NO.3 FILED UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 97
R/W.SEC.151 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that
inspite of his best efforts, he could not contact the
appellant and he has not received any instructions.
2. It appears that the appellant is not interested in
prosecuting the appeal.
3. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Cm/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!