Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3139 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:4467
MFA No. 431 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 431 OF 2024 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
H. SHIVAKUMAR
SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED
BY HIS LEGAL REPRSENTATIVES
1. SMT.SUNANDA W/O LATE H.SHIVAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
2. S.MANJUNATH S/O LATE H.SHIVAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
3. S.PAVITHRA D/O LATE H.SHIVAKUMAR
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE
Digitally signed ALL RESIDING AT NO 5347,
by SHARANYA T BEHIND PWD QUARTERS,
Location: HIGH SUBASHNAGAR,
COURT OF NELAMANGALA-562123.
KARNATAKA
4. G.H.PRAKASH S/O HANUMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/A SUBASHNAGAR
PWD QUARTERS BACKSIDE,
NELAMANGALA TOWN,
BENGALURU RURAL-562123
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. S. MOHAN RAJ, ADVOCATE FOR
SMT. SIRI R., ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:4467
MFA No. 431 of 2024
AND:
1. M/S. SRI SRINIVASA CHARITABLE TRUST
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
AT NO.193/4, HARSHA HOSPITAL CAMPUS,
BYRAVESHWARANAGAR,
NEAR BASAVANNADEVARA MUTT,
SONDEKOPPA CIRCLE,
NH-4, NELAMANGALA,
BENGALURU-562123.
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING TRUSTEE,
SRI S. SHIVAKUMAR
2. M/S. HARSHA HOSPITAL
A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
AT NO.193/4, BYRAVESHWARNAGAR,
SONDEKOPPA CIRCLE,
NELAMANGALA TOWN,
BENGALURU RURAL-562123.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. T.KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(r) R/W SECTION 151
OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09.01.2024 PASSED ON
I.A.NO.1 IN OS.NO.185/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA,
ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND
2 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant is absent.
The learned counsel for the respondent is present.
NC: 2024:KHC:4467
The learned counsel for the respondent brought to
the notice of this court the valuation made before the Trial
Court to the tune of Rs.6 Lakhs in para 23 of the plaint.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant in the
morning session submitted that the property value is more
and he submitted that this court is having jurisdiction, the
said contention cannot be accepted as the court has to
look into the averment made in the plaint, wherein they
have declared that valuation is Rs.6 Lakhs.
3. As the matter has to be determined by the Trial
Court, the appeal is not maintainable before this court.
4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn. However, liberty is given to the appellant to
approach the appropriate court.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!