Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3025 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 29258 OF 2023 (CS-EL/M)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. T. SAMPATH KUMARACHAR,
S/O. PUROHITH NARAYAN IYENGAR,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
2. SRI. SHIVANNA SHETTY,
S/O NILAKANTA SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
3. SRI. N. VENKATANARASHIMA SHETTY
S/O NINGAPURADA VENKATANARASHIMA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
Digitally signed by R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
AASEEFA PARVEEN
Location: HIGH PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
4. SRI. K. B. NARASHIME GOWDA
S/O BETTEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
5. SMT. JAYAMMA,
W/O. K. B. NARASHIME GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
6. SRI. M. SOMASHEKAR,
S/O. M. S. MALLASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
7. SRI. VARADARAJU,
S/O NARASHIME GOWDA @ BETTEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
8. SRI. K. S. KRISHNA IYENGAR
S/O KARAGAM SHESHA IYENGAR
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
9. SRI. M. MAHESH,
S/O. M. MARIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
10. SRI. J. SHIVANNA,
S/O JOGIGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
11. SMT. DEVAMMA,
W/O KODANDA RAMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
12. SRI. M. N. P. RATHNAM
S/O. S. NAGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
13. SRI. S. PARTHASARATHY
S/O. S. SAMPATHU
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
14. SRI. M. S. KANNAN
S/O S SAMPATHU
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
15. SMT. JAYALAKSHMI @ BHAGYA
W/O VENKATARAMU,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
16. SMT. SAROJAMMA,
W/O. KANCHI SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
17. SMT. SUSHEELAMMA,
W/O KUMARASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
18. SMT. LATHA,
W/O. M. V. NAGESH,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
19. SMT. GOWRAMMA,
W/O VENKATESH,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
-4-
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
20. SRI. SHEKARA,
S/O GURUVEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
21. SRI. KEMPEGOWDA,
S/O KARIGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
22. SRI. NEELAKANTA,
S/O. SUBBAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
23. SRI. DEVEGOWDA,
S/O KEMPEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
24. SMT. KAMALAMMA,
W/O. C. T. RAJU,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DIST.
25. SMT. B. SAVITHRI,
W/O. G. BETTEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
26. SRI. M. S. ANANTHARAMA SHETTY,
S/O. M. P. SRINIVASA SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
-5-
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
27. SMT. MANJULA,
W/O. SHIVANNA,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
28. SRI. S. CHALUVANARAYANA,
S/O. C. SINGRIGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
29. SMT. DEVAMMA,
W/O JAVAREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
30. SRI. N. NARASHIMEGOWDA,
S/O NARASEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
31. SRI. YOGANARASHIMEGOWDA,
S/O. NARASHIMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
32. SRI. M. N. KRISHNEGOWDA,
S/O. G. C. NARASHIMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
33. SMT. LAKSHMI,
W/O NARASHIMHA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
-6-
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
34. SRI. PANDURANGA,
S/O GURUVEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
35. SRI. N. VIJAYA RAJU,
S/O NARASHIMAHASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
36. SRI. NARASHIMEGOWDA,
S/O. KARIGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
37. SRI. M. T. MANU,
S/O. M. THAMMANNA GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
38. SMT. NAGAMMA,
W/O. CHIKKANNA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
39. SRI. K. S. SAMPATH KUMAR,
S/O. K. T. SUDARSHAN NARASHIMACHAR,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT MELUTKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
40. SRI. M. J. YOGANNA,
S/O LATE JAVARASHETTY,
AGED 48 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
-7-
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
41. SRI. S. N. SRIRAMAN,
S/O STANIKAM NARASHIMACHAR,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/AT MELUTKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
42. SRI. M. R. DARSHAN,
S/O. P. RAMASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/T MELUTKOTE TOWN
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
43. SMT. B. NAGARATHNA,
W/O G BETTEGOWDA
AGED 65 YEARS
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
44. SRI. E. J. SRIRANGARAJAN,
S/O. JAGGU NARASHIMHACHAR,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/T. MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
45. SRI M S VENKATANARASHIMHA SHETTY,
S/O. V. C. SUBBASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/T MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
46. SRI. G. RAMESH,
S/O LATE GURUDEVA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
R/AT MELUTKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
47. SRI. GOVINDEGOWDA,
S/O. KARIGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
-8-
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
48. SRI. M. S. GURURAJU,
S/O SHEKARA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
49. SRI. M. S. SHIVARAJU,
S/O SIDDEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/AT MELUTKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
50. SRI. RAJU,
S/O YALAKKI SANNEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
51. SRI. V. KUMAR,
S/O VENKATEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
52. SRI. M. S. MANJUNATH,
S/O SHIVANNA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
53. SRI. M. R. YOGANAND,
S/O RAJU,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
54. SMT. YASHODA,
W/O NINGEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
-9-
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
55. SMT. VASANTHA,
W/O M V MAYANNAGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
56. SRI. GURUSWAMY,
S/O LATE KENCHEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
57. SRI. H. MADHUSUDHAN,
S/O HONNEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
58. SRI. C. EREGOWDA
S/O LATE CHANNAVEEREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
59. SRI. N. SRIDHARA,
S/O NARASHIMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
60. SRI. M. K. SATHISH,
S/O. KARIGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
61. SRI. SHIVALINGA M. K.,
S/O KARIGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
- 10 -
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
62. SRI. M. V. SOMEGOWDA,
S/O VENKATEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
63. SRI. C. NAGENDRA,
S/O CHIKKARAMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
64. SRI. BAIREGOWDA,
S/O JAVAREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
65. SRI. M. V. SANJAY,
S/O C VENKATESH,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
66. SRI. K. L. YASHWANTHASHIMHA
S/O K S LAKSHMINARASHIMHA
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
67. SRI A. KRISHNA
S/O AMASHE,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
68. SRI. MADAN S.,
S/O SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
- 11 -
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
69. SRI. MAHESH,
S/O VENKATARAMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
70. SRI. CHETHAN N.,
S/O T NAGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
71. SRI. SANTHOSH,
S/O VENKATESH,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
72. SRI. SUNEEL KUMAR
S/O JAYARAMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
R/AT MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DIST.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. D.R. RAVISHANKAR , SENIOR COUNSEL A/W
SRI. HARSHA D.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION,
VIKASASOUDHA,
BANGALORE-560 001.
2. THE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSIONER,
3RD FLOOR, SHANTHINAGAR TTMC, "A" BLOCK,
K. H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 027.
- 12 -
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,
BEHIND SIDDARTHA THEATER, R P ROAD,
MANDYA - 571 401.
4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
OF CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
MANDYA DIVISION,
MANDYA, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434.
5. THE RETURNING OFFICER,
MELUKOTE MILK PRODUCERS CO OPERATIVE
SOCIETY LTD.,
MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDAVAPURA TALUK,
MANDYA DIST - 571 431.
6. THE MELUKOTE MILK PRODUCERS
CO-OEPRATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,
MELUKOTE TOWN,
PANDVAPURA TALUK,
MANDYA DIST - 571431.
REP BY ITS SECRETARY.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SIDHARTH BABU RAO,AGA FOR R1 , R3 -R5;
SRI. T.L. KIRAN KUMAR, AVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. A. MAHAMMED TAHIR, ADVOCATE FOR R6)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R2 TO
6 INCLUDE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS IN THE ELIGIBLE
VOTERS LIST AND PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO CAST THEIR
VOTES IN THE ELECTION TO THE R6 SOCIETY WHICH IS
SCHEDULE TO BE HELD ON 11.01.2024 ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
B-GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
- 13 -
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
WP No. 29258 of 2023
ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondent No.6 filed
statement of objections.
2. The same is taken on record.
3. Heard Sri. D.R.Ravishankar, the learned Senior
Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned
Government advocate appearing for respondents No.1, 3
to 5, the learned counsel appearing for Election
Commission and also the learned counsel appearing for
respondent No.6.
4. The petitioners in this petition have essentially
sought a direction to respondents No.2 to 6 to include the
names of the petitioners in the eligible voters' list and
permit the petitioners to cast votes in the election to board
of respondent No.6-Society held on 11.01.2024. This
Court vide interim order dated 04.01.2024 permitted the
petitioners to vote in the election held on 11.01.2024.
Thereafter the notices have been served and election is
held and petitioners have cast their votes and result is not
- 14 -
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
announced and the ballot papers issued to the petitioners
have been kept in a sealed box.
Learned Senior Counsel for petitioners
Sri.D.R.Ravishankar would raise the following contentions:
5. Respondent No.6-Society has not complied with
the requirement of Rule 13-D(2-A) of the Karnataka Co-
operative Societies Rules, 1960 which are held to be
mandatory in terms of the law laid down by the Division
Bench of this court in Mysore & Chamarajanagar
District Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Others vs State
of Karnataka & Others in W.A. No. No.1333/2023.
The non-compliance of mandatory rules will enable the
petitioners to caste vote in the election as the process of
holding the petitioners as ineligible voters itself is contrary
to the mandatory provisions of the Rule 13-D(2-A). He
would also submit that in Mohammad Beary & Others
vs The State of Karnataka & Others in
W.P.No.29271/2023 & Connected matters, this Court
has not allowed the petitioners to vote in the election and
- 15 -
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
petition is dismissed at the threshold and H.S. Raju &
Others vs State of Karnataka and Others 2022 (4)
AKR 775 case, this Court had permitted the petitioners to
vote in the election and noticing that there is no
compliance on the part of respondent No.6-Society while
finalising the voters' list has permitted the votes to be
counted. Thus, he would contend that as the mandatory
requirement is not followed, the petitioners shall be
permitted to vote in the election.
6. Learned counsel for respondent No.6 would
contend that the issue involved in this case is covered in
terms of the law laid down by this Court in B.Ganganna &
Others vs. The State of Karnataka and others in
W.P.No.29014/2023 dated 24.01.2024. He would also
point out that in H.S.Raju's case supra, the Court
permitted the votes to be counted in view of the
concession made by the bank which made a statement
that Rule 13-D(2-A) is not complied. It is also the
contention of the learned counsel for respondent No.6 that
- 16 -
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
the Society has issued notice to all the petitioners and
notices have been served and despite service of notice,
the objection to the notices not filed as such the
petitioners cannot raise a contention that they are eligible
to vote and contest in the election.
7. This Court has considered the contentions
raised at the Bar and also perused the records. Admittedly
in Mohammed Beary's case supra, this Court has taken
a view that once the calendar of events are published, the
election process cannot be stopped and writ petition under
Article 226 of Constitution of India is not maintainable
where the challenge is laid to the correctness of the
eligible and ineligible voters list.
8. In H.S.Raju's case supra, the Court was
dealing in a slightly different contest where there was an
exparte interim order permitting the petitioners to vote in
the election and the respondent-Society in the said case
made a statement that they have not followed the
requirement of Rule 13-D(2-A).
- 17 -
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
9. In B.Ganganna's case supra, this Court has
considered the above said judgments and has taken a
view that non-compliance of Rule 13-D(2-A) by itself will
not confer the petitioners right to vote. This Court has
taken a view that right to vote has to be established by
demonstrating that the petitioners have complied with the
requirements of Section 20(a-iv) and 20(a-v).
10. As already noticed, this petition is filed
subsequent to the publication of calendar of events. This
Court has taken a view that the non-compliance of Rule
13-D(2-A) itself cannot be a ground to permit the
petitioners to vote in the election and that right to vote
has to be demonstrated by producing the records to show
that the petitioners have fulfilled the requirements under
the Provisions of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act. In
this case, the petitioners are not entitled to relief that was
granted to the petitioners in H.S.Raju's case supra as the
respondent-Society has raised an objection and has taken
a stand that the society has issued notice to the
- 18 -
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
petitioners and petitioners have not replied to the said
notice. Admittedly, there is no reply to the notices issued.
Though, there are some defects in the said notices, as this
Court has taken a view that non-compliance of Rule 13-
D(2-A) by itself will not make the petitioners eligible to
vote in the election, the petitioners are not entitled to the
order similar to the one granted in H S Raju's case supra.
The votes cast by the petitioners cannot be counted while
declaring the election. Hence, the following:
ORDER
(i) Writ petition is dismissed.
(ii) However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to
raise the dispute under Section 70 of the Karnataka
Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.
(iii) If such a dispute is raised, notwithstanding the
dismissal of the writ petition, the authority shall
consider all contentions raised by the petitioners
relating to the eligibility or ineligibility of the voters
- 19 -
NC: 2024:KHC:4438
list and thereafter, pass appropriate orders in
accordance with law.
(iv) The votes cast by the petitioners shall be kept in a
separate sealed ballot box. If same is summoned in
any election dispute raised in connection with
election to the board of the society, the same shall
be placed before the authority summoning the
same.
(v) It is further made clear that the impact on the
election results shall have to be considered if the
petitioners are found to be eligible to vote in the
election and thereafter, appropriate orders will have
to be passed in accordance with law.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NS CT:TSM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!