Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Shanta Anantram Kalluraya vs Sri Shakeel Ahmed
2024 Latest Caselaw 19898 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19898 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt Shanta Anantram Kalluraya vs Sri Shakeel Ahmed on 7 August, 2024

Author: Krishna S.Dixit

Bench: Krishna S.Dixit

                                                 -1-
                                                       NC: 2024:KHC-D:11147-DB
                                                       CCC No. 100171 of 2024




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                        DHARWAD BENCH
                            DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

                                            PRESENT
                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
                                                 AND
                          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
                          CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100171 OF 2024


                   BETWEEN:


                   SMT. SHANTA ANANTRAM KALLURAYA,
                   AGE 59 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE,
                   R/O. PLOT NO.42, DEVASTHAN MARG,
                   CHIDAMBAR NAGAR, BELAGAVI,
                   TAL AND DIST. BELAGAVI.

                                                                 ...COMPLAINANT
                   (BY SRI. D. RAVIKUMAR GOKAKAKAR, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   SRI. SHAKEEL AHMED,
Digitally signed
by JAGADISH T
                        AGE 54 YEARS, THE COMMISSIONER,
R
Location: High
                        BELGAUM DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
Court of
Karnataka               ASHOK NAGAR, BELAGAVI,
Dharwad Bench
                        TAL AND DIST BELAGAVI-590001.

                   2.   DR. ANAJAY NAGABHUSHAN M. N,
                        THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                        ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN
                        DEVELOPMENT, M. S. BUILDING,
                        BENGALURU-560001.

                   3.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA     -PROFORMA RESPONDENT

                                                                      ...ACCUSSED
                   (BY SRI. M. A. HULYAL, ADV. FOR A1;
                        SRI. G. K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVT. ADV. FOR A3; (A2-SERVED))
                                   -2-
                                           NC: 2024:KHC-D:11147-DB
                                            CCC No. 100171 of 2024




      THIS CCC IS FILED U/S. 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF
COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF
INDIA,1950, PRAYING TO INITIATE AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR
DISOBEDIENCE OF ORDER DT 01-12-2021 IN W. P. NO. 63586/2010
(LB-RES) C/W. W.P. NO. 100630/2017 (LB-RES) PASSED BY THE
LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT, CONFIRMED IN
W.A. NOS.100044/2022 C/W. 100045/2022 DATED 13-09-2023,
PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND APPROPRIATE ORDERS MAY
KINDLY BE PASSED UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF
THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

     THIS CCC, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS
PASSED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
             AND
             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL

                           ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT)

A learned Single Judge of this Court in complainant's Writ

Petition No.63586/2010 c/w WP No.106630/2017 vide order dated

1.12.2021 has disposed off the lis observing at paragraphs-25 and 26

as under:

"25. As per the said rule, the authorities are entitled to collect only the sital value prescribed in respect of the original allotment and the price prevailing as on the date of original allotment. In that view of the matter, the subsequent notice issued in WP No.63586/2010 cannot also be sustained and the same is quashed.

26. The authorities shall complete the formalities of executing the relevant conveyance deeds and handover the possession of site bearing No.447 to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

NC: 2024:KHC-D:11147-DB

2. Answering respondent not being happy with the

same had preferred WA No.100044/2022 c/w WA

No.100045/2022, which a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court

negatived vide judgment dated 13.09.2023. We are told at the

Bar that the judgment of Co-ordinate Bench was put in

challenge before the Apex Court in SLP Nos.85-86/2024, which

also met with same fate at the hands of Apex Court.

3. Learned Panel Counsel appearing for the

respondent No.1, on behalf of his client, undertakes that formal

and necessary Conveyance Deeds shall be executed and

registered subject to payment of Stamp Duty by the

complainant's side within an outer limit of two weeks from this

day. He also assures that rest of the mandate in the impugned

order would also be complied with within the said period.

In view of the above, this proceeding is dropped with

liberty to the complainant to seek its revival by moving a

simple memo, in the event assurance is not kept. Answering

respondent is warned to adhere to the assurance, failing which,

it would amount to aggravated contempt, which may eventually

result into his imprisonment in addition to imposing hectic

costs, which runs a few thousand rupees.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:11147-DB

The compliance shall be reported to the learned Addl.

Registrar General of this Court within one week of the said

date.

Now, no costs.

Sd/-

(KRISHNA S.DIXIT) JUDGE

Sd/-

(VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE

JTR/ct-an

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter