Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19734 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:31759-DB
WP No. 18565 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
WRIT PETITION NO. 18565 OF 2017 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SHAMBULINGAIAH
S/O LATE MADAIAH
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
MANCHANAYAKANAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH
BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK
R/AT. CHAMUNDESHWARI NAGARA
10TH CROSS, BESIDE CHANNEL
MANDYA TOWN-562 159
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PREMA KUMAR A.L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed
by 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CHANNEGOWDA
PREMA ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU
Location: High
Court of RAMANAGARA DISTRICT
Karnataka
REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL P.P.
M.S. BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001
2 . SRI. M. MANISH
S/O MUNISWAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/AT SHESHAGIRIHALLI COLONY
HEEJALA POST, BIDADI HOBLI
RAMANAGARA TALUK-562 109
...RESPONDENTS
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:31759-DB
WP No. 18565 of 2017
(BY SRI. B.B. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. AKKIMANJUNATH GOWDA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF
CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE FIR DATED 13.03.2017 IN
Cr.No.4/2017 REGISTERED BY ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU,
RAMANAGAR VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for
the writ petitioner that the petitioner had challenged the
Government Order and FIR in the writ petition.
2. It is submitted that as far as Government Order is
concerned, the same has already been struck down by a
Co-Ordinate Bench of this Court. With regard to other
prayers, the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ
NC: 2024:KHC:31759-DB
petition without prejudice to his right to agitate the matter
afresh, if the lis survives.
3. In the above view of the matter, the submission
made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is accepted.
4. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ
petition without prejudice to his right to file afresh
challenging the FIR, in case the lis survives. The writ
petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/-
(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
MH/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!