Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19722 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:31215
MSA No. 26 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2023 (RO)
BETWEEN:
N. RAMESH
DEAD BY LRS
1. SMT. GAYATHRAMMA
W/O N. RAMESH
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
2. SMT. VASUNDARA
D/O N. RAMESH
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
3. SRI. PRASHANTH
S/O N. RAMESH,
AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT VARADANAYAKANAHALLI
KASABA HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK-562 105.
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
...APPELLANTS
Digitally (BY SRI. G. R. LAKSHMIPATHY REDDY, ADVOCATE)
signed by AND:
MALATESH
KC
1. SRI. V M SHIVANANDA
Location:
HIGH S/O V MARAPPA
COURT OF AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
KARNATAKA R/At VARADANAYAKANAHALLI
KASABA HOBLI,
SIDLAGHATTA TALUK-562105
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT
2. SMT. LAKSHMINARASAMMA
W/O V NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:31215
MSA No. 26 of 2023
3. SMT. SAVITRAMMA
D/O V NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
4. SMT. VIMALAMMA
D/O LATE V NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
5. SRI. SRINIVASA MURTHY
S/O LATE V. NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
6. SMT. N. SHOBHAVATI
D/O LATE V. NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
7. SRI. N. VENUGOPAL
S/O LATE V. NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
8. SRI. N. RAVISHANKAR
S/O LATE V. NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT VARADANAYAKANAHALLI
KASABA HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK-562105
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. BABU NARAYANA P.S., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
VIDE ORDER DATED:24/4/23 NOTICE TO R2 TO R8 IS
DISPENSED WITH)
THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(U) R/W
SEC 151 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 30.03.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.41/2016 ON THE FILE OF
THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
CHIKKABALLAPURA, SITTING AT CHINTAMANI, ALLOWING THE
APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 21.11.2014 PASSED IN OS.NO.107/2013 ON THE FILE
OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDLAGHATTA,
DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND FURTHER THE
MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE TRAIL COURT UNDER ORDER
41 RULE 23(A) OF CPC FOR A RETRIAL.
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:31215
MSA No. 26 of 2023
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT
After hearing the matter for some time, learned
counsel for the appellants files memo to withdraw the
appeal.
2. The memo reads as under;
"The appellants submits that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above appeal as withdrawn in the interest of justice."
3. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. In view of dismissal of main petition, the
pending interlocutory applications does not survive for
consideration. Accordingly, pending interlocutory
applications are disposed of.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45_CT:SK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!