Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19460 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:30615-DB
MFA No.3180/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3180/2016 (AA)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. C. RAJANNA
S/O. LATE SRI. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
2. SMT. NAGAMANI
W/O. SRI. C. RAJANNA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
3. SMT. R. MAMATHA
D/O. SRI. C. RAJANNA
W/O. SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
4. SMT. R. ANITHA
D/O. SRI. C. RAJANNA
Digitally W/O. SRI. T.D. YOGESH KUMAR GOWDA
signed by A K AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
CHANDRIKA
Location:
High Court of APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 4 ARE
Karnataka R/AT NO.258, SUGGATTA ROAD
HUNSMARANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-652827 ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. R B SADASIVAPPA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
SMT. B. N. VENKATALAKSHMI
W/O. SRI. C.L.N. MURTHY
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:30615-DB
MFA No.3180/2016
REP. BY HER GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
SRI. C.L. SANTOSH KUMAR
S/O. SRI. C.L.N. MURTHY
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/AT NO. 5AC-420, 2ND BLOCK
HRBR LAYOUT, KALYANANAGARA
BENGALURU - 560 042 ...RESPONDENT
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 37(1) (c) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT
1996, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
27.02.2016 PASSED IN ARBITRATION SUIT NO.15001/14 ON THE
FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DISMISSING THE
SUIT FILED UNDER SECTION 34 OF ARBITRATION AND
CONCILIATION ACT 1996.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL)
No representation for the appellants.
2. This matter was already once dismissed on
28.06.2017 for non compliance. For recalling the said order,
the appellant filed I.A.No.1/2021 after three years. By order
dated 01.09.2021 that application was allowed and the matter
was restored.
NC: 2024:KHC:30615-DB
3. Now since 2021 for another three years, office
objections are not complied. Such conduct of the appellant is
nothing but, the abuse of process of Court. No good purpose
will be served by granting further adjournment. Therefore, the
appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
(K.S.MUDAGAL) JUDGE
Sd/-
(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
PKN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!