Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Rajesh H N vs Smt. Rohini H S
2024 Latest Caselaw 19421 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19421 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri Rajesh H N vs Smt. Rohini H S on 2 August, 2024

Author: K.Somashekar

Bench: K.Somashekar

                                                 -1-
                                                           NC: 2024:KHC:30580-DB
                                                            MFA No. 647 of 2023
                                                        C/W MFA No. 675 of 2023



                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                              DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

                                              PRESENT
                              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
                                                AND
                          THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
                        MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 647 OF 2023 (FC)
                                             C/W
                        MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 675 OF 2023 (FC)

                       IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 647 OF 2023:


                       BETWEEN:

                       SRI. RAJESH H. N.,
                       S/O. MR. NANJUNASWAMY H. K.,
                       AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
                       R/AT NO. 59/2, HEBSUR VILLAGE,
                       SALIGRAMA HOBLI, K. R. NAGAR TALUK,
                       MYSURU DISTRICT.
                                                                    ...APPELLANT
                       (BY SRI. V. RANGARAMU, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
AASEEFA PARVEEN
Location: HIGH COURT   AND:
OF KARNATAKA

                       SMT. ROHINI H. S.,
                       W/O. MR RAJESH H. S.,
                       D/O. MR H. S. SRIRANGA,
                       AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
                       RESIDING AT NO 569,
                       SHREYA, FIRST FLOOR,
                       BEHIND VENKATARAMANA,
                       SWAMY TEMPLE, OIL MILL ROAD,
                       CHAMARAJA MOHALLA,

                       (OPP TO RAGHAVENDRASWAMY MUTT ROAD)
                            -2-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC:30580-DB
                                     MFA No. 647 of 2023
                                 C/W MFA No. 675 of 2023



MYSURU CITY AND DISTRICT
                                            ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. H.C. SHIVARAMU, ADVOCATE)

     THIS MFA FILED U/S.19(1) FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.12.2022 PASSED IN
MC NO.293/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL
PRL. FAMILY JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE PETITION
FILED U/S.13(1)(ia)(iii) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.

IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 675 OF 2023:
BETWEEN:

SRI. RAJESH H. N.,
S/O. MR. NANJUNDASWAMY .H.K,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 59/2, HEBBUR VILLAGE,
SALIGRAMA HOBLI, K.R. NAGAR TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT.
                                              ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. V. RANGARAMU, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. ROHINI H. S.,
W/O. MR. RAJESH H.N.,
D/O. MR. H.S. SRIRANGA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.569, SHREYA, FIRST FLOOR,
BEHIND VENKATARAMANA SWAMY TEMPLE,
OIL MILL ROAD, CHAMARAJA MOHALLA,
(OPP. TO RAGHAVENDRASWAMY MUTT ROAD),
MYSURU CITY AND DISTRICT
                                            ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. H.C. SHIVARAMU, ADVOCATE)

     THIS MFA FILED U/S 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.12.2022
PASSED IN MC NO.386/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE III
ADDITIONAL PRL. FAMILY JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE
                                  -3-
                                            NC: 2024:KHC:30580-DB
                                             MFA No. 647 of 2023
                                         C/W MFA No. 675 of 2023



PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1)(ia)(iii) OF THE HINDU
MARRIAGE ACT.

     THESE APPEALS ARE COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:      HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
            AND
            HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA


                      ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR)

This appeal is filed challenging the impugned

judgment and decree rendered by the Court below in

M.C.No.293/2021 and M.C.No.386/2021 dated

17.12.2022. However, for disposal of these appeals

relating to the aforesaid impugned judgment and decree

rendered by the Court below, it is deemed appropriate to

refer the status of the party to the proceedings. The

proceedings in M.C.No.293/2021 under Section 13(1)(ia)

and (iii) of Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of marriage

has initiated by Sri.Rajesh.H.N against his wife who is

arraigned as respondent namely Smt.Rohini.H.S. Whereas

the proceedings in M.C.No.386/2021 under Section 9 of

the Hindu Marriage Act for seeking restitution of conjugal

NC: 2024:KHC:30580-DB

rights has initiated by Smt.Rohini.H.S against her husband

who is arraigned as respondent namely Sri.Rajesh.H.N.

Whereas both the proceedings has been initiated by the

party to the said proceedings which is indicated therein

and also reflected in the common judgment rendered by

the Court below. The same has been reflected in the

operative portion of the order which has rendered by the

Court below in a common judgment. The same has been

challenged under this appeal by urging various grounds.

2. Learned counsel Sri.Rangaramu.V for the

appellant and Sri.H.C.Shivaramu, learned counsel for

respondent are present before this Court physically

inclusive of keeping physical presence of Sri.Rajesh.H.N

and Smt.Rohini.H.S who are the party to the aforesaid

matrimonial proceedings which has initiated by them

respectively before the Court of law for seeking the relief

as under the relevant provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act,

1955.

NC: 2024:KHC:30580-DB

3. This appeal has referred to Karnataka Mediation

Centre to explore the possibility of amicable settlement in

terms of the issues which has emerged in-between the

party to these appeal proceedings. Accordingly, the

memorandum of agreement under Section 89 of CPC read

with Rules 24 and 25 of the Karnataka Civil Procedure

(Mediation) Rules, 2005 is filed, wherein both the parties

herein stated their status that their marriage was

performed on 01.02.2017 as per the customs prevailing in

their society. The parties states and also admits that due

to irreconcilable differences and incompatibility of

temperaments of their family affairs that they did not have

any marital relationship between since 07.02.2021. The

efforts even though made by the elders, friends and well

wishers to resolve the differences between the parties did

not yield any fruits. There is absolutely no chance of

reunion between them. They know that their marriage is

irretrievably broken down and there are no chances of

reunion to lead happy married life. Hence, both the parties

NC: 2024:KHC:30580-DB

have agreed and accepted to agree for dissolution of their

marriage dated 01.02.2017.

4. It is further stated that the appellant and the

respondent stated that they have no children born to them

from their wedlock.

5. The appellant and respondent have mutually

agreed to settle all their disputes, claims once for all

towards maintenance/permanent alimony. In pursuance of

the same the appellant/husband has agreed to give the

respondent/wife a sum of Rs.20,50,000/-. The said

amount shall be paid in three installments of

Rs.7,50,000/- on 20.06.2024 at the time of reporting

settlement before this Court, the second installment of

Rs.7,50,000/- on 20.08.2024 and the third and final

installment of Rs.5,50,000/- on 20.10.2024.

6. This condition has been stated in mediation

report in paragraph No.4, but the learned counsel for the

parties in this matter and so also in the presence of the

NC: 2024:KHC:30580-DB

party to the appeal proceedings submits that the entire

agreed amount of Rs.20,50,000/- has already been paid

by the appellant/husband to his wife/respondent. The

respondent who is present before the Court namely

Smt.Rohini.H.S and she has submitted that and also it is in

the presence of the learned counsel for the parties and

also the appellant who is her husband that the entire

amount of Rs.20,50,000/- has already been received by

her. This submission made by the learned counsel for the

parties in the presence of the aforesaid respondent/wife is

also taken on record inclusive of condition No.4 in the

mediation report.

7. The respondent/wife has handed over the key

of the house situated at Nanjangud to the

appellant/husband and the appellant/husband

acknowledges having received the same.

8. The appellant/husband has handed over all the

clothes belonging to the respondent/wife and the

respondent/wife acknowledges having received the same.

NC: 2024:KHC:30580-DB

9. Apart from that both the parties agree that

their shall be no exchange of gifts/gold/silver/articles

given at the time of their marriage to each other.

10. Both the parties hereby declare that they shall

have no other claims of any nature whatsoever against

each other either past, present and future.

11. Both the parties herein state that there is no

undue influence, force or coercion in entering into this

agreement from anyone of anything.

12. The appellant hereby agreed that in view of the

aforesaid settlement arrived between the parties the

respondent/wife shall not make any claim in future

towards maintenance/permanent alimony or any other

claim on her behalf.

13. Both the parties shall not have any claim

against each other in respect of their all other

movable/immovable properties either existing or to be

acquired by them in future.

NC: 2024:KHC:30580-DB

14. The parties herein withdraw all the allegations

made against each other.

15. Both the parties admit that they shall not

interfere in personal, professional life of each other's lives

for any reason of whatsoever from this day.

16. With these conditions to settle the issues in-

between the party to the proceedings and also both the

parties withdrawal all the allegations made against each

other.

17. In view of the aforesaid settlement arrived at

between the parties to the proceedings who are the

parties to this appeal and they praying to pass appropriate

orders dissolving their marriage in terms of the

agreement/settlement.

18. The condition which has specifically stated in

the mediation report and also the report it is made in the

presence of the party to the appeal proceedings and the

same has been hereby applies to them. Consequently,

- 10 -

NC: 2024:KHC:30580-DB

they have submitted that mediation report has to be

considered in accordance with law.

19. Keeping in view the mediation report in detail

submitted by the Karnataka Mediation Centre and also

keeping in view the presence of the learned counsel for

the parties in both these appeals as well as in the

presence of the parties in these appeals matters are

concerned, it is deemed appropriate that the mediation

report which has submitted by the Karnataka Mediation

Centre is taken on record.

20. However, the proceedings in M.C.No.386/2021

dated 17.12.2022 rendering the judgment and decree by

the Court below relating to Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage

Act, 1955 and the same stands setting aside.

21. The proceeding in M.C.No.293/2021 dated

17.12.2022 even though common judgment and decree

rendered by the Court below. But the aforesaid proceeding

has been initiated by the husband namely Sri.Rajesh.H.N

- 11 -

NC: 2024:KHC:30580-DB

as under Section 13(1)(ia) and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage

Act, 1955 and dissolution of marriage where the relief has

been sought by him is hereby considered and allowed.

22. Consequently, both the appeals are hereby

disposed of.

Accordingly, the concerned branch is directed to draw

the decree accordingly.

Sd/-

(K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE

Sd/-

(DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE

NS CT:TSM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter