Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Somawwa (Mallawwa) W/O Rudrappa ... vs Rudrappa Basavanneppa Heggani
2024 Latest Caselaw 9876 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9876 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Somawwa (Mallawwa) W/O Rudrappa ... vs Rudrappa Basavanneppa Heggani on 4 April, 2024

Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Bench: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

                                         -1-
                                                NC: 2024:KHC-D:6157
                                                  RSA No. 100890 of 2014




                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                        DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                       BEFORE

                 THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

                    REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100890 OF 2014

             BETWEEN:

             SOMAWWA (MALLAWWA)
             W/O. RUDRAPPA HEGGANI,
             AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
             R/O. GUNDENHATTI - 591106
             TALUKA: KHANAPUR, DIST: BELAGAVI
             NOW RESIDING AT BAILUR-591149
             TALUKA: BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI
                                                              ...APPELLANT
             (BY SRI SHRIPRASAD J. JOSHI, ADVOCATE)

             AND:

             RUDRAPPA BASAVANNEPPA HEGGANI,
             AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
             R/O. GUNDENHATTI-591 106
Digitally    TALUKA: KHANAPUR, DIST: BELAGAVI
signed by                                                    ...RESPONDENT
             (BY SRI DINESH M. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)
SUJATA
SUBHASH
PAMMAR             THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
Location:    100 READ WITH ORDER XLII RULE 1 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,
HIGH COURT   1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
OF           09.04.2010 PASSED IN R.A.NO.93/2008 (OLD NO.77/2005) ON THE
KARNATAKA    FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KHANAPUR, AND TO RESTORE
             THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.03.2004         PASSED IN
             O.S.NO.221/1998 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE,
             (JR.DN) AND JFMC, KHANAPUR, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR
             MAINTAINANCE, BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL AND ETC.,.

                  THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS THIS DAY,
             THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                              -2-
                                    NC: 2024:KHC-D:6157
                                     RSA No. 100890 of 2014




                       JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant and the appellant

are present. The respondent is present. Learned counsel

for the respondent is absent. Both the appellant and the

respondent have filed joint compromise petition under

Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC stating that both have amicably

compromised the matter and accordingly they have filed

joint compromise petition.

2. It is agreed by both the parties and stipulated

in the compromise petition that the respondent has paid a

sum of Rs.3,80,000/- (Three Lakh Eighty Thousand

Rupees) to the appellant. Upon enquiry, the appellant has

stated that she has received the amount of Rs.3,80,000/-

from the respondent towards full and final settlement

between the parties. Upon enquiry by the Court they have

stated that on their own will and wish and with all

consciousness they have compromised the matter with

each other. Therefore both the appellant and respondent

NC: 2024:KHC-D:6157

have requested to dispose of the appeal in terms of the

compromise petition.

3. In the compromise petition at paragraph No.9 it

is stipulated that the appellant do not contest the other

claims pending before the revenue authorities in view of

this compromise. Further submitted, the said amount of

Rs.3,80,000/- received by the appellant from the

respondent is towards full and final settlement of the

dispute.

4. To this compromise petition, the learned

counsel for the appellant has affixed his signature. The

compromise petition do not carry signature of learned

counsel for the respondent. The learned counsel for

respondent is absent. However the respondent himself is

present before the Court and stated that he has

compromised the matter with the appellant, in the result

of which the joint compromise petition is filed today.

Hence placing the joint compromise petition on record,

this Regular Second Appeal is disposed of.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:6157

5. Draw decree in terms of the compromise

petition. Copy of the compromise petition shall be the part

and parcel of the decree.

Sd/-

JUDGE

MRK CT:ANB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter