Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohammad Shahid vs State Of Karnataka By
2024 Latest Caselaw 9647 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9647 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Mohammad Shahid vs State Of Karnataka By on 3 April, 2024

Author: S Vishwajith Shetty

Bench: S Vishwajith Shetty

                                                -1-
                                                           NC: 2024:KHC:13714
                                                      CRL.P No. 13792 of 2023




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                            BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                             CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13792 OF 2023
                   BETWEEN:

                         MOHAMMAD SHAHID
                         S/O ABUBAKAR,
                         AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
                         R/AT NO. 19,
                         PIPE LINE ROAD,
                         NEW GUDDENAHALLI,
                         BANGALORE - 560 089.
                                                                ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI. MANJUNATH B.R., ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
                         BHARATHI NAGARA POLICE STATION,
Digitally signed         BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY
by V KRISHNA             STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Location: High           HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
Court of
Karnataka                BANGALORE - 560 001.

                   2.    SADIQUE PASHA,
                         S/O S. ABDUL KHALEED,
                         AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
                         R/AT NO. 274, BRIGHT JEWELERS,
                         JAIN TEMPLE ROAD,
                         SHIVAJINAGAR,
                         BANGALORE - 560 001.
                                                              ...RESPONDENTS
                             -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC:13714
                                   CRL.P No. 13792 of 2023




(BY SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP FOR R1;
    NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN RESPECT OF R2)

     THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.57504/2023 OF
BHARATHINAGAR POLICE STATION REGISTERED FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 327, 427, 120B, 395
R/W 149 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF XI ADDL.C.M.M.,
MAYO HALL, BENGALURU.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                           ORDER

Accused No.4 in C.C.No.57504/2023 which is

pending before the Court of XI ACMM, Mayo Hall Unit,

Bengaluru for the offences punishable under Sections 143,

147, 148, 323, 324, 427, 120B, 395 R/w 149 of IPC is

before this Court with a prayer to quash the entire

proceedings in the said case against him.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned HCGP for respondent.

3. FIR in Crime No.85/2013 was registered by

Bharati Nagar Police Station, Bengaluru for the offences

NC: 2024:KHC:13714

punishable under Sections143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 427,

395 R/w 149 of IPC against Bright Jewellers and another

on the basis of first information received from respondent

No.2 herein. Investigation in the said case was complete

and charge sheet was filed for the aforesaid offences as

against 15 accused. The petitioner was arrayed as accused

No.4 in the charge sheet. Accused No.1 had died during

pendency of the case before the Trial Court. Accused

Nos.2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11 to 14 were tried for the aforesaid

offences by the Court of 57th Addl. City Civil & Sessions

Judge, Bengaluru in S.C.No.724/2019 and they have been

acquitted by the said Court by the judgment and order of

acquittal dated 12.03.2020. The case as against the

petitioner herein was split up and a split up case was

registered as against him in C.C.No.57504/2023 which is

now pending before the committal Court. The petitioner is

before this Court with a prayer to quash the entire

proceedings in the said case as against him on the ground

that other accused facing similar charges have been

acquitted by the Trial Court in S.C.No.724/2019.

NC: 2024:KHC:13714

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner having

reiterated the grounds urged in the petition submits that

allegations against all accused are identical and in a full-

fledged trial, accused Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11 to 14 have

been acquitted by the Trial Court and the said judgment

and order of acquittal dated 12.03.2020 has attained

finality. Therefore, no purpose would be served in

continuing the impugned proceedings as against the

petitioner.

5. Learned HCGP does not dispute the submission

made by learned counsel for the petitioner that judgment

and order of acquittal passed by the Trial Court in

S.C.No.724/2019 dated 12.03.2020 has attained finality.

6. The charge sheet has been filed in the present

case as against 15 persons for the offences punishable

under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 427, 120B, 395

R/w 149 of IPC . Accused No.1 is said to have been died

during the pendency of the case. Therefore, case as

NC: 2024:KHC:13714

against him stood abated. Accused Nos.2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11

to 14 were tried for the alleged offences by the

jurisdictional Sessions Court in S.C.No.724/2019 and by

judgment and order dated 12.03.2020 they have been

acquitted in the said case.

7. Undisputedly, the said judgment and order of

acquittal has attained finality. Since the petitioner was

absconding as on the date when the case as against the

aforesaid accused was committed to the Trial Court, a split

up case was registered against him and the same is now

pending before the committal Court in

C.C.No.57504/2023. Since the other accused as against

whom similar allegations were made have been already

acquitted by jurisdictional Sessions Court in

S.C.No.724/2019, no purpose would be served in

continuing the impugned proceedings as against the

petitioner. Continuation of impugned proceedings as

against the petitioner is futile exercise and waste of

Court's time. Under the circumstance, I am of the opinion

NC: 2024:KHC:13714

that the prayer made by the petitioner is required to be

granted.

8. Accordingly, the petition is allowed.

The entire proceedings in C.C.No.57504/2023 which

is pending before the Court of XI ACMM, Mayo Hall Unit,

Bengaluru for the offences punishable under Sections 143,

147, 148, 323, 324, 427, 120B, 395 R/w 149 of IPC is

hereby quashed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NMS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter