Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9624 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:13345-DB
CRL.A No.1104/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1104/2018
BETWEEN:
SMT.LAKSHMAMMA
W/O K RAJU
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.9, 10TH E CROSS
ANJENEYA SWAMY TEMPLE MAIN ROAD
MARUTHI NAGARA (BALAJI NAGARA)
ITTAMADU
BENGALURU - 560 085
PRESENTLY R/AT NO. 27, 1ST FLOOR
4TH CROSS, KAKATHIYANAGAR
NAIDUS LAYOUT
BENGALURU - 560 061 ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.KEMPARAJU, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
Digitally signed
by PRABHU AND:
KUMARA
NAIKA
Location: High 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Court of
Karnataka BY ITS DSP, CID
CHANNAMMANAKERE ACCHUKATTU
POLICE STATION
REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT COMPLEX
BENGALURU - 560 001
2. SRI NANJESH
S/O SHIVARAM
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
CASTE: THIGALARU
OCCUPATION: WRITER
R/O NO.5, 4TH CROSS
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:13345-DB
CRL.A No.1104/2018
PAPAIAH GARDEN
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE
BENGALURU - 560 085
NOW AT
SANTHE KODIHALLI
KANAKAPURA TQ
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 119
3. SRI NANJUNDA
S/O SHIVARAM
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
OCCUPATION: COOLI
R/O NO.5, 4TH CROSS,
PAPAIAH GARDEN
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE
BENGALURU - 560 085
4. MADAMMA
W/O SHIVARAM
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/O NO.5, 4TH CROSS
PAPAIAH GARDEN
BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE
BENGALURU - 560 085
NOW AT
SANTHE KODIHALLI
KANAKAPURA TQ.,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 119 ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.THEJESH P, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI.GOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 372 CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF ACQUITTAL DATED
21.04.2018, PASSED BY THE LI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE CITY (CCH-52) IN
S.C.NO.358/2011.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,
K.S.MUDAGAL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:13345-DB
CRL.A No.1104/2018
JUDGMENT
No representation for the appellant/complainant.
The records show that even before the trial Court, after
service of summons, the appellant/complainant did not choose
to give her evidence for three years. The trial Court's order
sheet dated 24.11.2017 shows that she refused to enter the
witness box to tender evidence. Under the circumstances, we
do not find any grounds to further adjourn the matter.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
PKN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!