Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9600 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:13347
MFA No. 7213 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7213 OF 2013(MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1. CHIKKALINGEGOWDA
S/O SIDDEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
2. SUMITHA.M.C.
D/O CHIKKALINGEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,
3. JYOTHI.M.C
D/O CHIKKALINGEGOWDA,
AGED 13 YEARS,
REPRESENTED BY NATURAL
GUARDIAN, FATHER, APPELLANT NO.1
ALL ARE RESIDENT OF MACHAGOUDANA HALLI,
BASARALU HOBLI,
Digitally signed by
THEJASKUMAR N MANDYA TALUK & DISTRICT-571 401.
Location: HIGH ...APPELLANTS
COURT OF (APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 3-CALLED OUT-ABSENT)
KARNATAKA
AND:
1. THIMMAIAH
S/O DASAIAHNA KIVUDAIAH,
MAJOR,
SINCE DEAD BY LR'S
(a) ANAIAH
S/O LATE THIMMAIAH,
MAJOR,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:13347
MFA No. 7213 of 2013
(b) ASHOK
S/O LATE THIMMAIAH,
MAJOR,
(c) RAJA
S/O LATE THIMMAIAH,
MAJOR,
ALL ARE R/O HALEHALLI,
KOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT-571 401.
2. THE MANAGER,
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
P.B.NO.54, V.V.ROAD,
MANDYA CITY-571 401.
...RESPONDENTS
(R1(a) TO (c)-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
BY SRI. A.N.KRISHNASWAMY., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:25.04.2013
PASSED IN MVC NO.111/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) AND CJM, MANDYA.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR
FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The name of the appellants are called out thrice in the
open Court. There is no representation on behalf of the
appellants either personally or through video conferencing. The
appellants are absent.
NC: 2024:KHC:13347
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal
was listed on 28.03.2024, on that day, counsel Sri.Vinay
D.Hosmath., was permitted to retire from the case and the
appeal was ordered to be listed on 02.04.2024 by printing the
name of appellants in the cause list.
The appeal is listed today by printing the name of
appellants in the case list. The appellants have not made any
efforts to engage the services of other advocate or conducted
the case as party in person.
As already noted above, the name of the appellants are
called out thrice in the open Court. There is no representation
on behalf of the appellants either personally or through video
conferencing. The appellants are absent. It appears that the
appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence,
the Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE MRP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!