Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9595 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:13349-DB
WA No. 1165 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
WRIT APPEAL No. 1165 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. MR. DINESH G.,
S/O LATE GURUMURTHY,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
RESIDING AT No. 1237,
11TH CROSS, SHANKARNAG CIRCLE,
BSK, 1ST STAGE, 2ND BLOCK,
BANASHANKARI,
BANGALORE 560050.
...APPELLANT
(BY Dr. AMIT ANAND DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by BELUR AND:
RANGADHAMA
NANDINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF 1. SMT. K.S. SHOBA DEVI,
KARNATAKA
W/O SRI N. RAVISHANKAR,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT No. F/404, SHRIRAM SUHANA,
DHODDABALAPUR MAIN ROAD,
SURYAVANSHI LAYOUT,
YELAHANKA BORRANG LANE,
BANGALORE 560064.
2. ANANDA RATHI GOLOBAL FINANCE LIMITED.,
REGISTERED OFFICE, EXPRESS ZONE,
A WING, 10TH FLOOR,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:13349-DB
WA No. 1165 of 2023
WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY,
GOREGAON EAST,
MUMBAI 400063.
REP BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER/MANAGER.
3. ANANDA RATHI GOLOBAL FINANCE LIMITED,
4TH FLOOR, BIKANER PINNACLE,
RHENUIS St., SHANTALANAGAR,
RICHMOND ROAD,
BANGALORE 560025.
REP BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER/MANAGER
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER DATED 10/07/2023 IN WP No.12695/2023 PASSED BY
HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BENCH.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY
ANU SIVARAMAN J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard learned counsel on both sides quite in extenso.
We have also referred to the decisions relied upon by
learned counsel appearing on both sides.
2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel
on both sides and the provisions of Section 17 of the
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 as also the
NC: 2024:KHC:13349-DB
decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court, in Celir LLP vs. Bafna
Motors (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. and others1, which is relied
upon by learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the
opinion that the direction in the impugned order to the
effect that the issue of limitation shall not be raised before
the Debts Recovery Tribunal was not justified.
3. The appeal is, therefore, disposed of vacating the
direction that the issue of limitation shall not be raised
before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
The Debts Recovery Tribunal shall consider all
aspects of the matter including the question of limitation
as is raised before it.
Certified copy of this judgment shall be issued to the
appellant immediately so as to place it before the Debts
Recovery Tribunal. All questions are left open to be
decided by the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
2023 LiveLaw (SC) 808
NC: 2024:KHC:13349-DB
The parties shall appear before the Debts Recovery
Tribunal along with certified copy of this judgment on
18.04.2024.
Till then, the Debts Recovery Tribunal shall not pass
orders in the Securitization Appeal.
In view of disposal of main appeal, pending I.As, if
any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of
as well.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
MV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!