Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P. Ramu S/O P Nageswara Rao vs S. Ravi Kumar S/O Madhavaiah Swamy
2024 Latest Caselaw 9376 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9376 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

P. Ramu S/O P Nageswara Rao vs S. Ravi Kumar S/O Madhavaiah Swamy on 1 April, 2024

                                               -1-
                                                            NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925
                                     MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016,
                                      MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                              DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                             BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
                    MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100618 OF 2016 (MV-I)
                                           C/W
                    MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100011 OF 2016 (MV-I)
                    MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100012 OF 2016 (MV-I)
                    MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100619 OF 2016 (MV-I)

                   IN MFA NO100618/ 2016

                   BETWEEN:

                   P. RAMU S/O P. NAGESWARA RAO,
                   AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC: FITTER IN JSW,
                   R/O: S. G. COLONY, TORNAGALLU,
                   SANDUR-TALUK, BALLARI-DT,
                   NOW AT BALLARI.
                                                                    ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA G. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   S. RAVI KUMAR S/O. MADHAVAIAH SWAMY,
                        AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OWNER CUM DRIVER
Digitally signed        OF AUTO BEARING REG.NO.KA-345/A-5307,
by ROHAN
HADIMANI T              R/O. DOOR NO.127, WARD NO.2,
Location: HIGH          NEAR WATER TANK, HAGALUR VILLAGE,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA               TQ: SIRUGUPPA, BALLARI-DT.

                   2.   THE MANAGER CHOLAMANDALAM
                        M. S. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
                        DARE HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR,
                        NO.234, N.S.C. BOSE ROAD, CHENNAI.
                                                                ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SRI. RAVINDRA R. MANE FOR R2;
                       NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH)

                        THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF
                   MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE LOWER COURT
                   RECORDS IN MVC NO.748/2013 DATED 01-10-2015 ON THE FILE OF
                   MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL-IIND AT BALLARI AND
                              -2-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925
                  MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016,
                   MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016




ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION FROM RS. 3,84,230/- TO
RS.10,20,000/- IN MVC NO.748/2013 DATED 01-10-2015 ON THE
FILE OF MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIM TRIBUNAL-IIND AT BELLARY IN
THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

IN MFA NO. 100011 OF 2016

BETWEEN:


CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD,
BY ITS MANAGER, DARE HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR,
NO.234, N.S.C BOSE ROAD, CHENNAI,
HEREIN REPRESENTED BY
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD,
UNIT NO.4, 9TH FLOOR(LEVEL-06),
"GOLDEN HEIGHTS" COMPLEX, 59TH "C" CROSS,
INDUSTRIAL SUBRUB, RAJAJINAGAR, 4TH "M" BLOCK,
BENGALURU-560010, REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY.
                                                 ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. R. R. MANE, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   P. RAMU S/O. P. NAGESWARA RAO,
     AGE ABOUT 28 YEARS,
     OCC: WORKING AS FITTER IN JSW,
     R/O. S. G. COLONY, TORNAGALLU, SANDUR TALUK,
     BELLARY DIST, NOW AT BALLARI.

2.   S. RAVIKUMAR S/O. MADHAVAIAH SWAMY,
     AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC: OWNER-CUM-DRIVER
     OF THE AUTO BEARING REG NO.KA-34/A-5307,
     R/O. D.NO:127, WARD NO,.2, NEAR WATER TANK,
     HAGALUR VILLAGE, SIRUGUPPA TALUK,
     BALLARI DIST.
                                              ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATH G. PATIL, ADV. FOR R1;
    NOTICE TO R2 DISPENSED WITH)

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS,
ALLOW   THIS   APPEAL  BY    REDUCING   THE    AMOUNT    OF
COMPENSATION GRANTED TO THE CLAIMANT SUITABLY AND SET
ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DTD: 01/10/2015 PASSED BY
                              -3-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925
                  MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016,
                   MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016




THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIM TRIBUNAL-II, BALLARI IN MVC
NO.748/2013 AND ETC.

IN MFA NO. 100012 OF 2016

BETWEEN:

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD,
BY ITS MANAGER, DARE HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR,
NO.234, N.S.C BOSE ROAD, CHENNAI,
HEREIN REPRESENTED BY
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD,
UNIT NO.4, 9TH FLOOR(LEVEL-06),
"GOLDEN HEIGHTS" COMPLEX, 59TH "C" CROSS,
INDUSTRIAL SUBRUB, RAJAJINAGAR, 4TH "M" BLOCK,
BENGALURU-560010, REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY.
                                                  ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. R. R. MANE, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   R. M. VISHWARADHYA @ VISHWA
     S/O R. M. GURUMALLAYYA SWAMY,
     AGE: ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC: WORKING AS
     MECHANICAL FITTER AND ELECTRICIAN IN JSW
     AND DOING AGRICULTURE WORK,
     R/O. S. G. COLONY, TORNAGALLU,
     SANDUR TALUK, BALLARI DIST.

2.   S. RAVIKUMAR S/O. MADHAVAIAH SWAMY,
     AGE: ABOUT 34 YEARS,
     OCC: OWNER-CUM-DRIVER OF THE AUTO
     BEARING REG NO.KA-34/A-5307,
     R/O. D.NO:127, WARD NO.2,
     NEAR WATER TANK, HAGALUR VILLAGE,
     SIRUGUPPA TALUK, BALLARI DIST.
                                                ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATH G. PATIL, ADV. FOR R1;
    NOTICE TO R2 SERVED)

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS,
ALLOW   THIS   APPEAL  BY    REDUCING   THE    AMOUNT    OF
COMPENSATION GRANTED TO THE CLAIMANT SUITABLY AND SET
ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DTD: 01/10/2015 PASSED BY
                              -4-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925
                  MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016,
                   MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016




THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIM TRIBUNAL-II, BALLARI IN MVC
NO.749/2013 AND ETC.

IN MFA NO. 100619 OF 2016

BETWEEN:

R. M. VISHWARADHYA @ VISHWA
S/O. R. M. GURUMALLAYYA SWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
OCC: EX-MACHANICAL FITTER AND ELECTRICIAN
IN JSW AND AGRICULTURAL WORK,
R/O. S. G. COLONY, TORNAGALLU,
SANDUR- TALUK, BALLARI-DT.
                                                 ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA G. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   S. RAVI KUMAR S/O. MADHAVAIAH SWAMY,
     AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
     OWNER CUM DRIVER OF AUTO BEARING
     REG.NO.KA-345/A-5307, R/O. DOOR NO.127,
     WARD NO.2, NEAR WATER TANK, HAGALUR
     VILLAGE, SIRUGUPPA TALUK, BALLARI-DT.

2.   THE MANAGER CHOLAMANDALAM,
     M. S. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
     DARE HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR,
     NO.234, N.S.C. BOSE ROAD, CHENNAI.
                                             ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. R. R. MANE, ADV. FOR R2;
    NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH)

      THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE LOWER COURT
RECORDS IN MVC NO.749/2013 DATED 01-10-2015 ON THE FILE OF
MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL-IIND AT BALLARI AND
ENHANCE    THE    COMPENSATION   FROM    RS.10,65,840/-   TO
RS.15,20,000/- IN MVC NO.749/2013 DATED 01-10-2015 ON THE
FILE OF MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIM TRIBUNAL-IIND AT BELLARY IN
THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

     THESE  APPEALS,   COMING    ON   FOR   HEARING   ON
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
                                  -5-
                                           NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925
                    MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016,
                     MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016




                     COMMON JUDGMENT

      Though these appeals are listed for orders, with the

consent of learned counsel for the parties, they are taken up

for final disposal, as they arise out of the same accident.


      2.    These    appeals     are    directed      against   common

judgment and award dated 01.10.2015 passed in MVC Nos.748

& 749 of 2013 on the file of learned Member, MACT-II, Ballari

(for short, 'Tribunal').


      3.    MFA No.100618/2016 is filed by the claimant

seeking enhancement of compensation in MVC No.748/2013,

whereas    the   insurer   has   also    filed   an    appeal   in   MFA

No.100011/2016 challenging the quantum of compensation.


      4.    MFA No.100619/2016 is filed by the claimant

seeking enhancement of compensation in MVC No.749/2013,

whereas    the   insurer   has   also    filed   an    appeal   in   MFA

No.100012/2016 challenging the quantum of compensation.


      5.    Heard the learned counsel Sri.Manjunath G Patil for

the appellant/claimant and learned counsel Sri.R.R. Mane for

the appellant/Insurance Company.
                                 -6-
                                            NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925
                     MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016,
                      MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016




     6.       Sri. Manjunath G Patil, learned counsel for the

appellant/claimant submits that the Tribunal committed grave

error in awarding a meager compensation to both the

claimants under the heads of pain and suffering, loss of

amenities, loss of income during laid-up period and incidental

expenses.      He seeks to enhance the same by allowing the

appeals filed by the claimants.


      7.      Per contra, learned counsel R.R.Mane for        the

appellant/insurance company in support of his appeals would

submit that the Tribunal has committed an error in awarding

compensation under the head of future income due to

disability. He submits that both the claimants have continued

with their employment and later they have promoted and their

salary has been substantially increased, hence, there would be

no loss of future income of the appellants/claimants due to

disability.   He seeks to set-aside the same by allowing the

appeals filed by the insurer.     It is further submitted that the

award of compensation by the Tribunal on the other heads are

just and proper, does not require any enhancement. He seeks

to allow the appeals filed by the insurance company by

dismissing the appeals filed by the claimants.
                                  -7-
                                             NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925
                      MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016,
                       MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016




      8.    I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and

perused the material available on record.


      9.    The parties to the proceedings do not dispute that

on 7.8.2012, both claimants were proceeding on motorcycle

bearing    registration      No.KA-34/Y-2393      from      Ballari   to

Toranagallu,     at   that   time,     one   Auto-rickshaw     bearing

registration No.KA-34/A-5307 driven by its driver in a rash and

negligent manner and dashed against the motorcycle of the

claimants, resulting in both claimants sustained grievous

injuries   and   took     treatment.    Considering   the     evidence

available on record, the Tribunal awarded total compensation

of Rs.3,84,230/- in MVC No.748/2013 and Rs.10,65,840/- in

MVC No.749/2013 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.


      10. The contention of the appellant/insurance company

that both the claimants are working in JSW Company and even

after recovering from the injuries sustained in the accident,

they continued with their employment, hence, no loss of future

income due to disability would arise. The said submission is

supported with the document available on record. This Court

on re-appreciation of entire evidence on record, is of the
                                        -8-
                                               NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925
                        MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016,
                         MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016




considered view that the both the claimants are not entitled to

compensation on the head of loss of future income due to

disability.


      11. Admittedly, the claimant in MVC No.748/2013 is

examined as PW1 and examined one doctor as PW3, who

issued     Disability     Certificate          and     deposed        that    the

claimant/injured has sustained cut lacerated wound measuring

6x1 cm on right knee, tenderness over the right shoulder joint

and tenderness over right leg and right thigh. Taking note of

the injuries suffered by the claimant, this Court is of the

considered view that the Tribunal committed an error in

awarding compensation on the head of pain and suffering and

other heads, which are required to be re-assessed by awarding

just and proper compensation. This Court on re-assessment of

evidence      available   on        record,    would    award     a     sum    of

Rs.50,000/-          towards        pain      and    suffering   as      against

Rs.20,000/-,     a    sum      of    Rs.15,000/-        towards       attendant

charges, nursing and food nourishment as against Rs.3,000/-

and a sum of Rs.20,000/- towards medical expenses as

against Rs.10,000/- awarded by the Tribunal. The appellant is

entitled to a sum of Rs.1,15,672/- (Rs.28,918 x 4 months)
                                   -9-
                                           NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925
                    MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016,
                     MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016




towards loss of income during laid-up period as against

Rs.28,912/-     awarded    by     the   Tribunal   and   Rs.50,000/-

towards loss of amenities as against Rs.5,000/- awarded by

the Tribunal.     The appellant is also entitled to a sum of

Rs.15,000/- towards loss of marriage prospects as against

Rs.5,000/- awarded by the Tribunal.                Thus, in all, the

appellant/claimant in MVC No.748/2013 is entitled to modified

compensation on the following heads:


     Pain and suffering                             Rs. 50,000/-
     Attendant, nursing & nourishment               Rs. 15,000/-
     Medical expenses                               Rs. 20,000/-
     Loss of income during treatment period         Rs.1,15,672/-
     Loss of amenities                              Rs. 50,000/-
     Loss of marriage prospects                     Rs. 15,000/-
                                                    ------------------
                          Total                     Rs.2,65,672/-
                                                    ------------------

     12. Thus, the appellant/claimant is entitled to total

compensation of Rs.2,65,672/- as against Rs.3,84,230/-

awarded by the Tribunal.


     13. In MFA No.100619/2016 (MVC No.749/2013), the

appellant/claimant has sustained lacerated wound over right

side of scalp with avulsion of bone flap, cut lacerated of size

8x1 cm over right knee and lacerated wound size 2x1 cm over

dorsal aspect of right foot near 4th toe. Keeping in mind the
                                - 10 -
                                          NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925
                   MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016,
                    MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016




oral testimony of PW4 and medical evidence available on

record, this Court is of the considered view that the appellant

is entitled to a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- towards pain and

suffering as against Rs.1,00,000/- and a sum of Rs.15,000/-

towards nursing, attendant, food, nourishment as against

Rs.3,000/- awarded by the Tribunal. The Tribunal awarded a

sum of Rs.3,00,770/- towards medical expenses, which is

unaltered. The appellant is entitled to a sum of Rs.1,06,792/-

towards loss of income during treatment period as against

Rs.53,396/- awarded by the Tribunal, a sum of Rs.30,000/-

towards future medical expenses as against Rs.20,000/-,

Rs.50,000/- towards loss of amenities as against Rs.10,000/-

and Rs.15,000/- towards loss of marriage prospects as

against Rs.5,000/- awarded by           the Tribunal. Thus, the

appellant/claimant in MVC No.749/2013 is entitled to modified

compensation on the following heads:


     Pain and suffering                         Rs.1,50,000/-
     Attendant, nursing & nourishment           Rs. 15,000/-
     Medical expenses                           Rs.3,00,770/-
     Loss of income during treatment period     Rs.1,06,792/-
     Loss of amenities                          Rs. 50,000/-
     Future medical expenses                    Rs. 30,000/-
     Loss of marriage prospects                 Rs. 15,000/-
                                               ------------------
                       Total                   Rs.6,67,562/-
                                               ------------------
                                 - 11 -
                                          NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925
                   MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016,
                    MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016




     14. Thus, the appellant/claimant is entitled to total

compensation of Rs.6,67,562/- as against Rs.10,65,840/-

awarded by the Tribunal.


     15. In the result, I proceed to pass the following:

                                  ORDER

a) The above appeals are partly allowed.

b) The impugned common judgment and award of the Tribunal is modified to an extent that the appellant/claimant in MVC No.748/2013 is entitled to total compensation of Rs.2,65,672/- as against Rs.3,84,230/- awarded by the Tribunal and in MVC No.749/2013 is entitled to total compensation of Rs.6,67,562/- as against Rs.10,65,840/- awarded by the Tribunal.

c) The appellant/Insurance Company shall deposit the entire compensation amount in respect of both the appellants/injured before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this Judgment.

d) Apportionment, deposit and disbursement shall be made as per the award of the Tribunal.

- 12 -

NC: 2024:KHC-D:5925 MFA No.100618/2016 C/W MFA 100011/2016, MFA No.100012/2016, MFA No.100619/2016

e) The amount in deposit made by the appellant/Insurance Company in MFA Nos.100011 and 100012 of 2016, be transmitted to the Tribunal forthwith.

f) Draw modified award accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

JTR Ct-an

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter