Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt P Jyothi vs Sri N Shivashankar
2024 Latest Caselaw 10888 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10888 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt P Jyothi vs Sri N Shivashankar on 22 April, 2024

Author: K.Somashekar

Bench: K.Somashekar

                                                 -1-
                                                         NC: 2024:KHC:15946-DB
                                                             RFA No. 465 of 2017




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                              DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                              PRESENT

                               THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR

                                                 AND

                                THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

                            REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 465 OF 2017 (DEC)

                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    SMT. P. JYOTHI,
                            W/O SRI. P. SRINIVAS,
                            AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
                            R/AT NO.47, 'SHUBA GRUHA',
                            MUNIREDDY LAYOUT,
                            MAHADEVAPURA POST,
                            BENGALURU-560 048,
                            PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
                            MANJUNATHA NILAYAM,
                            2ND MAIN ROAD, NANDINI LAYOUT,
                            B. NARAYANAPURA,
Digitally signed by         BENGALURU-560 016.
MOUNESHWARAPPA
NAGARATHNA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
                      2.    SRI. K. A. ASHOKAN
KARNATAKA                   S/O LATE AGNISARMAN NAMBOODIRI ,
                            AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
                            R/AT NO.16/17, 'SRI SAILAM'
                            RAJA RAJESHWARI LAYOUT PHASE-II,
                            D. V. NAGAR POST,
                            BENGALURU-560 016.

                      3.    SRI. RAVINDRAN P.V
                            S/O LATE P K VELAYUDHAN,
                            AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
                            R/O NO.38, 'SABARI'
                            MEG LAYOUT,
                           -2-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC:15946-DB
                                      RFA No. 465 of 2017




     B. NARAYANAPURA,
     DOORAVANINAGAR POST,
     BENGALURU-560 016.

4.   SMT. KOMALA RAVINDRAN,
     W/O RAVINDRAN P.V
     AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
     R/O NO.38, 'SABARI'
     MEG LAYOUT, B. NARAYANAPURA,
     DOORAVANINGAR POST,
     BENGALURU-560 016.

5.   S. SATHYANARAYANAN,
     S/O SWAMINATHAN
     AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
     R/AT SRI.SATHYA SAI HOSTEL,
     KADUGODI POST,
     BENGALURU-560 067,
     PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
     PLOT NO.10, 49/3B,
     SAI COLONY EXTENSION,
     BELATHUR, KADUGODI POST,
     BENGALURU-560 067.

6.   PUSHKARAN C.V
     S/O CHANDRAN
     AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
     R/O NO.5, TEJA LAYOUT,
     NEAR GANGAMMA TEMPLE,
     MAHADEVAPURA POST,
     BENGALURU-560 048.

7.   MR. BASAVA PUNNAIAH TALLURI ,
     S/O T. AYYANNA,
     AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
     R/O NO.338, "SAI SRI",
     GANGAMMA TEMPLE STREET,
     MAHADEVAPURA,
     BENGALURU-560 048.

8.   SMT. P.V. SATHYADURGA DEVI,
     W/O BASAVAPUNNAIAH TALLURI,
                          -3-
                                 NC: 2024:KHC:15946-DB
                                    RFA No. 465 of 2017




     AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
     R/O NO.338, "SAI SRI"
     GANGAMMA TEMPLE STREET,
     MAHADEVAPURA,
     BENGALURU-560 048.

9.   BALASUBRAMANIYAN GANESH,
     S/O KRISHNASWAMY BALASUBRAMANIYAN,
     AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
     REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY
     HOLDER SRI. S. RAMESH,
     AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
     S/O K. SEETHARAM,
     NO.5, SRI. RAJA RAJESHWARI LAYOUT,
     BEHIND DRDO, PHASE-II,
     DOORAVANINAGAR POST,
     BENGALURU-560 016.

10. UNNIKRISHNAN RAMAN NAMPOORTHIRI,
    S/O LATE RAMAN NAMPOORTHIRI,
    AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
    REPRESENTED BY HIS
    POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
    SRI. K. A. ASHOKAN
    S/O LATE AGNISARMAN NAMBOODIRI,
    AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
    NO.16/17, 'SRI SAILAM'
    RAJA RAJESHWARI LAYOUT PHASE-II,
    D.V. NAGAR POST,
    BENGALURU-560 016.

11. SMT. AMBIKA SHYAMALA,
    W/O UNNIKRISHNAN P VASUDEVAN
    AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
    REPRESENTED BY HER
    POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
    SRI. M.K. PURUSHOTHAMAMNAYAR,
    AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
    S/O LATE KRISHNA PILLAY
    NO.22, LAKSHMI KRIPA,
    MEG LAYOUT, D.V. NAGAR POST,
    BENGALURU-560 003.
                            -4-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC:15946-DB
                                       RFA No. 465 of 2017




12. SRI. SREEVALSAN PILLAI,
    S/O VASUDEVAN NAIR ,
    AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
    REPTD. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
    J. LEELU NAIR,
    NO.628,7TH CROSS,
    HAL III STAGE,
    JEEVAN BHIMA NAGAR,
    BENGALURU-560 075.

13. SMT. P.VIJAYA CHAMUNDESHWARI,
    W/O R. SATHYANARAYANA,
    AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
    R/O NO.178, 4TH CROSS, 12TH 'A' MAIN,
    4TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
    BENGALURU-560 034.
                                             ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. V JAVAHAR BABU, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   SRI. N. SHIVASHANKAR
     S/O LATE K. NANJUNDAIAH
     AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
     R/AT NO.33, 3RD CROSS,
     KASHI VISHWANATH LAYOUT,
     KRISHNARAJAPURAM,
     BENGALURU-560 036.

2.   SRI. K. SATYANARAYANA,
     S/O LATE K. VENKATANARAYANA
     AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
     R/AT NO.12, S.R.R LAYOUT,
     BEHIND DRDO, PHASE-II,
     DOORAVANI NAGAR,
     BENGALURU-560 016.

3.   MRS. RAJEEVELAYUDHAN NAIR,
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
     C/O MR. J. LEELU NAIR,
     NO.628, 7TH CROSS,
     HAL III STAGE,
                                  -5-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC:15946-DB
                                          RFA No. 465 of 2017




    JEEVAN BHIMA NAGAR,
    BENGALURU-560 075.
                                              ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAY A.M, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1,
    R2 & R3 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

     THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE
1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
12.01.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.6940/2012 ON THE FILE OF
THE 42nd ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND
INJUNCTION.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
K.SOMASHEKAR, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                          JUDGMENT

Sri V.Javahar Babu, learned counsel for the appellants, is

present before this Court physically.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants has filed memos

seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the above appeal in

respect of Appellant Nos.1, 2 to 6, 9 to 13, and 7 (LR of

appellant No.8) stating that the dispute between the appellants

and the contesting respondent, i.e., respondent No.1, is

amicably settled out of Court.

3. Sri.Vijay A.M., learned Counsel for respondent No.1,

who is on record by filing Caveat Petition under Section 148-A

of CPC is present before the Court physically and submits that

NC: 2024:KHC:15946-DB

he has no objection to considering the said memos filed by the

learned counsel for the appellants.

4. In the meanwhile, learned counsel for respondent

No.1 has filed a memo for the return of documents i.e., the

original Exhibits 'P' series marked before the Trial Courts in

O.S.No.6940/2012.

5. Memos are placed on record.

6. In view of the memos filed by the learned counsel

for the appellants, the regular first appeal is dismissed as

withdrawn.

7. In view of memo filed by the learned counsel for

respondent No.1, the Registry is directed to return the original

Exhibits 'P' series marked before the Trial Court in

O.S.No.6940/2013 after obtaining photostat copies of the

same.

8. Further, learned counsel for the appellants has

prayed for refund of the Court Fee. Keeping in view the

submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants

regarding refund of Court Fee, Registry is directed to refund the

NC: 2024:KHC:15946-DB

admissible Court Fee as prayed by the appellants, in

accordance with law, if necessary application is filed.

9. In view of withdrawal of the main appeal, all

pending applications do not survive for consideration and the

same are disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

KTY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter