Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri. Prabhakar S/O. Kempanna Sanadi vs Shri. Appasaheb S/O. Shivagouda Desai
2024 Latest Caselaw 10548 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10548 Kant
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Shri. Prabhakar S/O. Kempanna Sanadi vs Shri. Appasaheb S/O. Shivagouda Desai on 18 April, 2024

                                                -1-
                                                                NC: 2024:KHC-D:6495
                                                           MFA No. 100581 of 2022




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                             DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                              BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
                    MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100581 OF 2022 (MV-I)

                   BETWEEN:

                   SHRI. PRABHAKAR S/O. KEMPANNA SANADI,
                   AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER AND
                   AGRICULTURE, NOW NIL,
                   R/O. ALAND-591254, TALUKA: HUKKERI,
                   DISTRICT: BELAGAVI.
                                                                       ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SMT. SUNANDA P. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   SHRI. APPASAHEB S/O. SHIVAGOUDA DESAI,
                        AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS
                        AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. NAGANUR-591233,
                        TALUK: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI.

                   2.   THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD,
                        REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISONAL MANAGER,
                        DIVISION OFFICE, MAIN ROAD,
Digitally signed        OPP. TO S.T.STAND, GADHINGLAJ-416502,
by JAGADISH T
R                       TALUKA: GADHINGLAJ, DISTRICT: KOLHAPUR,
Location: HIGH          MAHARASHTRA STATE.
COURT OF                                                            ...RESPONDENTS
KARNATAKA
                   (BY SRI. M. K. SOUDAGAR, ADV. FOR R2;
                       NOTICE TO R1 SERVED)

                        THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF
                   MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL BY
                   MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 05.09.2019 IN MVC
                   NO.670/2017 PASSED BY THE X ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND
                   MEMBER OF ADDITIONAL MACT, BELAGAVI AND ENHANCE THE
                   COMPENSATION FROM RS. 2,49,210/- TO RS.12,00,000/- TO THE
                   APPELLANT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

                        THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
                   COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                 -2-
                                               NC: 2024:KHC-D:6495
                                         MFA No. 100581 of 2022




                         JUDGMENT

Though this appeal is listed for admission, with the

consent of learned counsel for the parties, it is taken up

for final disposal.

2. This appeal is filed by the injured/claimant

seeking enhancement of compensation, being aggrieved

by the judgment and award dated 05.09.2019 passed in

MVC.No.670/2017 by the X Addl. District and Member of

Addl. MACT., Belagavi (for short, 'Tribunal').

3. Heard Smt.Sunanda P.Patil, learned counsel

appearing for the appellant/claimant and

Sri.M.K.Soudagar, learned counsel appearing for the

respondent No.2/Insurance Company.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the

appellant/claimant submits that the Tribunal has

committed grave error in assessing the income of the

appellant as well as awarded meager compensation under

NC: 2024:KHC-D:6495

the heads of 'pain and suffering', 'loss of amenities', 'loss

of income during laid-up-period' and on other conventional

heads, hence, she seeks to reassess the same taking note

of Ex.P6-Wound Certificate and Ex.P20-CT Scan report of

the injured. Thus, she seeks to allow the appeal.

5. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the

respondent No.2/Insurance Company supports the

impugned judgment and award of the Tribunal and

submits that the appellant has not placed any evidence

with regard to his income, hence, the assessment of

income by the Tribunal is just and proper and does not call

for any modification. He further submits that the disability

assessed by the Tribunal at 8% is in consonance to the

injuries suffered by the appellant, which does not call for

any modification. He submits that the award of

compensation by the Tribunal on all the other heads is also

just and proper and does not require interference. Thus,

he seeks to dismiss the appeal.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:6495

6. I have heard the arguments of the learned

counsel appearing for the parties. Perused the material

available on record.

7. It is not in dispute that the claimant/injured

met with a road accident dated 19.08.2015 and sustained

various fractures referred in Wound Certificate at Ex.P6.

The appellant in order to establish his disability, has

produced Disability Certificate at Ex.P11 and considering

the oral evidence as well as the documentary evidence

available on record, the Tribunal has rightly assessed the

disability at 8%, which is unaltered.

8. This Court while reassessing the compensation,

notionally assesses the income of the claimant/injured at

Rs.8,000/- per month placing reliance on the notional

income chart prepared by the Karnataka State Legal

Services Authority. There is no dispute with regard to the

multiplier as '18'. Thus, loss of future income due to

disability is recomputed as under:

NC: 2024:KHC-D:6495

Rs.8,000/- (income) x 12(months) x 18 (multiplier) x 8%

(disability) = Rs.1,38,240/-

9. This Court on re-appreciation of the entire

evidence on record, is of the considered view that the

Disability Certificate at Ex.P11 does not contain certain

injuries sustained by the appellant which are found in the

Wound Certificate. Hence, taking note of the same, this

Court deems it appropriate to award an additional sum of

Rs.15,000/- under the head of 'pain and suffering',

additional sum of Rs.20,000/- under the head of 'loss of

amenities' and additional sum of Rs.10,000/- under the

head of 'incidental expenses'.

10. The appellant is entitled to Rs.32,000/-

(i.e.Rs.8,000 X 4 months) under the head of 'loss of

income during laid-up-period'.

11. Insofar as the award of compensation under the

head of medical expenses is concerned, the same is

NC: 2024:KHC-D:6495

unaltered. Thus, in all, the claimant shall be entitled to

modified compensation under the following heads:

                     HEADS                          AMOUNT
                                                    (in Rs.)
Loss of future income due to disability              1,38,240/-
Towards pain and suffering                              55,000/-
Loss of amenities                                       40,000/-
Loss of income during laid-up-period                    32,000/-
Incidental expenses                                     15,000/-
Medical expenses                                        35,250/-
                   Total                             3,15,490/-



      Thus,    the    claimant    shall    be    entitled   to   total

compensation of Rs.3,15,490/- as against Rs.2,49,210/-

awarded by the learned Tribunal.

12. In the result, this Court proceeds to pass the

following:

ORDER

a) Appeal stands allowed in part.

b) The impugned judgment and award of the Tribunal is modified to an extent that the claimant would be entitled to total compensation of Rs.3,15,490/- as against Rs.2,49,210/- awarded by the Tribunal.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:6495

c) The enhanced compensation amount shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till the date of payment.

d) The Insurance Company shall deposit the enhanced compensation amount with accrued interest before the Tribunal within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment.

e) On such deposit, the same shall be released in favour of the claimant/injured.

f) Registry to transmit the records, if any, to the Tribunal forthwith.

g) Draw modified award accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

RH Ct-an

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter