Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10475 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:6421
RFA No. 100147 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100147/2018(DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
MRS. JACINTA
W/O. JOSEPH FERNANDES,
AGE: 58 YERS,
OCC: LAND AND HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: ROOM NO.44, BUILDING NO.56,
B. D. B. CLOCKS, WORLI, MUMBAI-18,
REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER,
SHRIDHAR S/O. AMRUTIRAO GHASARI,
AGED ABOUT 47 EYARS,
OCC:PRIVATE SERVICE,
R/O: CTS NO.5518, PLOT NO.12,
'SAKALP BUILDING', 6TH CROSS,
SHASHTRI NAGAR, BELAGAVI - 590 002.
...PETITIONER
Digitally
signed by (BY MRS. JACINTA
MANJANNA E W/O. JOSEPH FERNANDES IS ABSENT)
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
AND:
1. NORBERT FRANCIS MENEZES,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
OCC: PROPRIETOR
"WHITE WATER LIVING",
R/O: AMBELI ILAVA GRAM,
POST:GANESHAGUDI, TQ:JOIDA,
UTTAR KANNADA - 581 301.
2. MR. IGNATIUS CAJETAN BRAGANZA,
S/O. LEO GRANSIS BRAGANZA,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:6421
RFA No. 100147 of 2018
AGED ABOUT 65 EYARS,
OCC:BUSINESS,
R/O: H. NO.A-1747, AGAV VADDO,
CALANGUTE, BARDEZ, GOA.
3. THE TAHASILDAR
JOIDA,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA - 581 301.
4. THE SUB-REGISTRAR
HALIYAL,
DIST:UTTAR KANNADA - 581 301.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI RAMESH I. ZIRALI, AND
SRI SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI VITTHAL S. TELI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI P.N.HATTI, HCGP FOR R3 AND R4)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI
RULE OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.02.2018
PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HALIYAL IN
O.S.NO.10/2017 OLD O.S.NO.38/2009 AND CONSEQUENTLY
DISMISS THE SUIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:6421
RFA No. 100147 of 2018
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
seeking permission to retire from the case. He has enclosed the
acknowledgement issued by the appellant, dated 25.03.2024
for having taken back the entire papers.
Memo is accepted.
Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to retire
from the case.
Appellant called out absent. The appeal is of the year
2018. It appears that appellant is not interested in prosecuting
the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed for default i.e. for non
prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE
AC/CT-ASC
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!