Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manappuram Finance Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 10031 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10031 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Manappuram Finance Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 April, 2024

Author: M.Nagaprasanna

Bench: M.Nagaprasanna

                                             -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC:14340
                                                         WP No. 3145 of 2024




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                           BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA


                        WRIT PETITION NO. 3145 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)


                  BETWEEN:

                        MANAPPURAM FINANCE LTD.,
                        A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
                        THE COMPANIES ACT 1956,
                        HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT
                        MANAPURAM HOUSE,
                        A O VALAPAD, TRISSUR DISTRICT,
                        KERALA - 680567
                        HAVING ONE OF ITS BRANCH AT:-
                        BTM 2ND STAGE BUILDING NO.10
                        (OLD NO 20), GROUND FLOOR,
                        100FT RING ROAD,
                        9TH MAIN, BTM 1ST STAGE
                        NEAR MICO LAYOUT BUS STOP
                        BANGALORE DT., PIN - 560029
Digitally signed by     REP BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY,
NAGAVENI                AND LEGAL MANAGER,
Location: HIGH          MR PRAVEEN BAILAPPA HOOLI
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                                                       ...PETITIONER
                  (BY SRI. POORNA PRASAD K R., ADVOCATE)

                  AND:

                  1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                        BY ITS SECRETARY,
                        HOME DEPARTMENT,
                        VIDHANA SOUDHA,
                        BENGALURU 560001
                                     -2-
                                                   NC: 2024:KHC:14340
                                                  WP No. 3145 of 2024




2.   THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
     OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
     B H ROAD, ASHOKA NAGAR,
     TUMAKURU CITY 572103

3.   THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
     INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
     CHELUR POLICE STATION,
     GUBBI CIRCLE, GUBBI,
     TUMKUR 572216

                                                      ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.P. YOGANNA, AGA)


     THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
NOTICE DTD 29.01.2024 ADDRESSED TO THE MANAGER,
MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED, THE PETITIONER HEREIN, BY
THE R-3 FURNISHED AS ANNEXURE-E AND ETC.


      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
- 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                               ORDER

The petitioner is before this Court calling in question a

police notice under Section 91 of the Cr.P.C. dated 29.01.2024.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

would submit that the identical issue is answered by a

Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in WP.No.10754/2023,

disposed on 06.06.2023.

NC: 2024:KHC:14340

3. The learned High Court Government Pleader would

also admit position that the issue stands answered by the

judgment rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench. The Co-ordinate

Bench has held as follows:

"The subject matter of this Writ Petition is substantially similar to the one in W.P.No.22441/2022 (GM-Police) between M/S.MUTHOOT FINANCE LTD., VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA disposed off by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 15.11.2022, wherein paragraph nos. 2 & 3 of the said judgment reads as under:

"2. A perusal of the order passed on 14.10.2022,the notice does not in effect indicate anything contrary to what is passed. The only observation is that the writ petition is dismissed and therefore, the gold articles are directed to be produced for investigation. This Court has permitted production of gold articles for investigation, but the Investigating Officer cannot seize the same.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is co-operating with the investigation and indication of dismissal of the petition should not lead to seizure of the gold articles. This Court has clearly held that the gold articles cannot be seized and therefore, the Investigating Officer cannot seize the gold articles, but can examine the same by summoning it for the purpose of investigation."

2. The Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos. 932-933/1974 between A.V.VINODA & ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS COMMISSIONER & SECRETARY disposed of on 11.12.1974, has held that the Court should treat the like-cases alike and if relief is granted to a litigant it has to be extended to a similarly circumstanced litigant as well, there being no derogatory circumstances.

NC: 2024:KHC:14340

In view of the above, relief granted to the litigant in the cognate Writ Petition is extended to the Petitioner herein as well, mutantis mutandis.

No costs."

In the light of the issue standing answered, the petitioner

is entitled to the same relief that is granted by

Co-ordinate Bench, in the afore-quoted order.

4. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

NVJ

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter