Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7256 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:37324
RSA No. 376 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 376 OF 2017 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI VENKATA REDDY
S/O LATE BABU REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
SANJURAYANAHALLI,
HAMPASANDRA POST,
GUDIBANDE TALUK-561209.
2. SMT. SAROJAMMA
W/O HONNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
KASHAPUR,
BAGEPALLI TALUK-561207.
3. SRI RAMAKRISHNAPPA
Digitally signed
S/O LATE BABU REDDY,
by SHARANYA T AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
Location: HIGH SANJURAYANAHALLI,
COURT OF HAMPASANDRA POST,
KARNATAKA
GUDIBANDE TALUK-561209.
4. SMT NAGARATHNAMMA
W/O NARSIMHAMURTHY,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
KASHAPUR,
BAGEPALLI TALUK-561207.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VENKATA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:37324
RSA No. 376 of 2017
AND:
1. SRI ADINARAYANAPPA
S/O RANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
SANJEEVARAYANAHALLI,
HAMPASANDRA HOBLI,
GUDIBANDE TALUK-561209.
2. SRI RAMACHANDRAPPA
S/O RANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
DIGAVAGARGANNAPALLY
GORANTLA HOBLI,
YAGAVAGANGAMMAPALLY POST,
HINDUPUR TALUK
ANDRA PRADESH-515201.
3. SMT. RANGAMMA
S/O LATE RANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS
SANJEEVARAYANAHALLI,
HAMPASANDRA HOBLI,
GUDIBANDE TALUK-561209.
4. SMT THIPPAKKA
D/O PULLAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
KERAVALAPALLI,
HINDUPUR TALUK
ANDRA PRADESH-515201.
5. SMT. SARASWATHI
D/O RANGAPPA,
W/O MUNINARAYANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
BACHAHALLI, NANDI HOBLI,
CHICKBALLAPUR TALUK-562101.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MOHANA CHANDRA P., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R4;
R3 HELD SUFFICIENT VIDE ORDER DATED 08.12.2022;
R5 - SERVED)
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:37324
RSA No. 376 of 2017
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 R/W ORDER XLII RULE 1 OF
CPC., 1908 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT DECREE DTD
11.04.2016 PASSED IN R.A.NO.199/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE
ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHICKBALLAPUR AND
ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This Court vide order dated 27.09.2023, on perusal of the
retirement memo along with the copy of the letter, postal
receipt and postal acknowledgement, permitted the counsel for
the appellants to retire from the case and granted two weeks
time to the appellants to engage the new counsel and also
made it clear that if the appellants does not engage the new
counsel within the stipulated time, the appeal will be dismissed
on the next date of hearing. Inspite of the said order, the
appellants have not engage the new counsel. Hence, the
appeal is dismissed in view of the order dated 27.09.2023.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!