Karnataka High Court
Sri Revoji Rao Alias Narayana Rao vs Smt Siddu Bai W/O Late Basoji Rao @ ... on 9 October, 2023
Bench: V Srishananda
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:36644
RFA No. 996 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 996 OF 2008(DEC)
BETWEEN:
SRI REVOJI RAO ALIAS NARAYANA RAO
S/O SIDDOJI RAO
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
RESIDING AT C/O HANUMANTHA ROA
DOOR NO.303 "E"BLOCK,
KEB QUARTERS, RAJAJINAGAR,
BANGALORE -10.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI T S CHANDRAPRABHA AND
SRI B.S.SOMASHEKHARAIAH AND SRI NAGABHUSHAN,
ADVOCATES)
AND:
1. SMT SIDDU BAI
W/O LATE BASOJI RAO @ SIDDOJI RAO
Digitally SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL
signed by R
MANJUNATHA REPRESENTATIVES
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA 1(a) SRI S SHIVOJI RAO
SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
1(a)(i) SMT T SUSHEELA BAI
W/O LATE S. SHIVAJI RAO
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
1(a)(ii) SMT. S SONY BAI
D/O LATE S SHIVAJI RAO
W/O VISWANATH RAO
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:36644
RFA No. 996 of 2008
1(a)(iii) SMT. S GEEJA BAI
D/O LATE S SHIVAJI RAO
W/O ESWAR RAO
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
1(a)(iv) SMT S SHOBA BAI
D/O LATE S SHIVAJI RAO
W/O KRISHNOJI RAO
1(a)(v) SMT S KAVITHA BAI
D/O LATE S SHIVAJI RAO
W/O KRISHNOJI RAO
1(a)(vi) S CHANDRA SHEKAR RAO
S/O LATE S SHIVAJI RAO
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
1(a)(vii) SMT UMA BAI
W/O MAHESH KUMAR
D/O LATE S SHIVAJI RAO
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
1(a)(viii) SMT. USHA BAI
D/O S SHIVAJI RAO
W/O GOPINATH
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
1(a)(ix) SHASHIKALA BAI
D/O S SHIVAJI RAO
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
W/O MADHU RAO
PROPOSED LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
1(A)(i), 1(A)(iii) TO 1(a)(ix) ARE
RESIDING AT NO.53, 7TH CROSS
MAGADI ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 023
PROPOSED L.R 1(a) (ii) IS
RESIDING AT NO.3, 7TH 'H' MAIN,
18TH CROSS,
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:36644
RFA No. 996 of 2008
S.R.NAGAR,
BANGALORE - 53.
1(b) SRI S SHYAMA RAO
S/O LATE BASOJI RAO ALIAS SIDDOJI RAO
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.29,
1ST CROSS, AZAD NAGAR,
BANGALORE -560 018.
2. SRI S GOPALAKRISHNA
SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
2(a) SMT. CHADRA BAI
W/O LATE GOPLAKRISHNASA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
2(b) SRI RAMESH
S/O LATE GOPALAKRISHNASA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
2(c) SMT.MEENA BAI
D/O LATE GOPALAKRISHNASA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
2(d) SRI ASHWATH
S/O LATE S/O LATE GOPALAKRISHNASA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
2(e) SRI GNANESH
S/O LATE GOPALAKRISHNASA
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
2(f) SRI SHANKAR
S/O LATE GOPALAKRISHNASA
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 2(a), 2(c),
2(e), 2(f) ARE
RESIDING AT No.38,
-4-
NC: 2023:KHC:36644
RFA No. 996 of 2008
RAMESH INDUSTRIES
6TH CROSS, GANESHA TEMPLE ROAD
CHOLURPALYA MAIN ROAD,
MAGADI ROAD
BANGALORE - 23.
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 2b AND 2d ARE
RESIDING AT No.13/1, 1ST CROSS
ANNAYYAPPA LANE
COTTONPET
BANGALORE - 53.
...RESPONDENTS
[BY SRI K.R.SUBRAMANYA RAO, ADVOCATE R1;
SRI B.K.DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1(A)(i, iii TO ix);
R1(A)(ii) NOTICE SERVED;
SRI S.S.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2(a) to (f)]
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.03.2008
PASSED IN O.S.NO.6725/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE XVIII
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY,
(CCH.NO.32), DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND
SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Case called twice. None present on behalf of appellant.
On the earlier date of hearing also, there was no
representation on behalf of the appellant. This Court, suo motu
adjourned the matter to day from 29.09.2023. Even on
13.09.2023, time was granted to the counsel for appellant on
the ground of settlement.
NC: 2023:KHC:36644
RFA No. 996 of 2008
Order sheet shows that the appellant is not interested in
prosecuting the appeal in a proper manner.
Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
kcm
