Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Nanjappa vs State By Amruthur Police
2023 Latest Caselaw 8358 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8358 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 November, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Nanjappa vs State By Amruthur Police on 24 November, 2023

                                              -1-
                                                          NC: 2023:KHC:42601
                                                       CRL.A No. 175 of 2018




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                       DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

                                           BEFORE

                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

                              CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 175 OF 2018

                   BETWEEN:

                       SRI. NANJAPPA ,
                       S/O. GANGAIAH,
                       AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
                       OWNER-CUM-DRIVER OF
                       TRACTOR-CUM-DRIVER OF
                       REG.NO.KA-06-T8499/8500,
                       R/O KAGGERE, YEDIYUR HOBLI,
                       KUNIGAL TALUK,
                       TUMAKURU DISTRICT-577 101.
                                                                ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. M B RYAKHA, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                       STATE BY AMRUTHUR POLICE,
Digitally signed
by VINUTHA M           KUNIGAL TALUK,
Location: HIGH         TUMKUR DISTRICT-577 101,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA              REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                       HIGH COURT BUILDING,
                       HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                       BANGALORE-560 001.
                                                           ...RESPONDENT
                   (BY SRI. VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP)

                        THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.374(2) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
                   SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.12.2017 PASSED BY THE
                   PRINCIPAL   SESSIONS/SPECIAL     JUDGE,    TUMAKURU    IN
                   SPL.C.NO.222/2016 - CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED
                   FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 379 OF IPC AND SEC. 4(1A) R/W 21
                                       -2-
                                                       NC: 2023:KHC:42601
                                                  CRL.A No. 175 of 2018




OF MINES AND MINERALS (DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION)
ACT AND U/S 3 R/W 181 OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                             JUDGMENT

This appeal preferred by the appellant/accused against

the judgment and order passed in S.C.No.222/2016 dated

05.12.2017 passed by the Prl. Sessions/Special Judge at

Tumakuru. Wherein, the Sessions Judge has convicted the

accused for offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC and

Section 4(1A) r/w Section 21 of Mines and Minerals

(Development of regulation) Act 1957 and Section 3 r/w

Section 181 of Motor Vehicles Act and thereby sentenced the

appellant/accused to pay the fine amount of Rs.5,000/- for

offence punishable under Sections 379 of IPC and in default of

payment of fine, the accused is directed to undergo simple

imprisonment for a period of 3 months. Further, he also

sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/- for offence punishable

under Section 4(1A) r/w 21 of Mines and Minerals

(Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in default of payment

of fine the appellant/accused is directed to undergo further

simple imprisonment for a period of 6 months. The

NC: 2023:KHC:42601

appellant/accused further directed to pay a fine of Rs.500 for

offence punishable under Section 3 r/w Section 181 of Motor

Vehicles Act, in default of payment of fine, he shall undergo

simple imprisonment for a period of one month.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant/accused

would submit that subsequent to preferring the current appeal,

this Court vide order dated 30.01.2018 was pleased to suspend

the sentence imposed by the Sessions Court with condition that

the appellant/accused shall deposit the entire fine amount.

3. In pursuance of the said order, the

appellant/accused has deposited the entire fine amount before

the Principal District and Session Judge as per the punishment

imposed by the learned Sessions Judge in respect of the

aforesaid offences on 06.12.2017 reflecting as per the order

sheet of the trial court records. Hence, he would submit that

the fine amount is already deposited and order of sentence is

also already complied. As such he does not intend to prosecute

this appeal on merit by challenging the judgment passed by the

trial Court supra. Accordingly, he prays for an order in this

regard.

NC: 2023:KHC:42601

4. On query, learned counsel for the appellant fairly submits that the amount in deposit may be adjusted for payment of fine that is imposed by the learned Sessions Judge and accordingly prays for closure of the Criminal appeal.

5. The oral submissions of the learned counsel for the

accused is taken on record and accordingly in terms of the

submission, this appeal is disposed of.

Bail bond executed by the appellant/accused shall stand

cancelled.

Sd/-

JUDGE HKV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter