Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1929 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2023
-1-
RSA No. 1045 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1045 OF 2019 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. SATHYA ALIAS KALYANI
W/O. LATE ANANTHARAMA NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS
R/AT KANARADI HOUSE
MARANE POST, MANIPURA VILLAGE
UDUPI DISTRICT.
2. KALYANI ALIAS SHANTHA NAYAK
W/O. GANESH NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
R/AT PATLA HOSUE
POST KUNJIBETTU
UDUPI DISTRICT.
3. GIRIJA ALIAS RAJEEVI NAYAK
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T W/O. ACHUTHA V NAYAK
Location: HIGH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
COURT OF R/AT MOODUSAGRI HOUSE
KARNATAKA
POST KUNJIBETTU
UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT.
4. GANGA ALIAS SHANTHA KAMATH
W/O. VITTAL KAMATH
R/AT KEMMANNU BAILU HOUSE
PATLA POST, PARKALA
HIREBETTU VILLAGE
UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT B &
SRI S.N. BHAT., ADVOCATES)
-2-
RSA No. 1045 of 2019
AND:
1. ANANTHA NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O. LATE SRINIVASA NAYAK
R/AT D.NO.4-35, NOLE HOUSE
POST KUNJIBETTU
UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT.
GUDU ALIAS NAGAMMA (SINCE DEAD)
2. LEELAVATHI NAYAK
W/O. ANANTHARAMA NAYAK
AJITHA NILAYA, NOLE
DARKSTH HOUSE
KUNJIBETTU POST
UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT.
3. NETHRAVATHI ALIAS PREMA NAYAK
W/O. LATE MAHADEVA NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
R/AT SARALEBETTU HOUSE
POST MANIPAL, HERGA VILLAGE
UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT.
4. UPENDRA S. NAYAK
S/O. LATE. SRINIVASA NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
R/AT NO.311(2) ANNAGHAR CO-OP. SOCIETY,
SAIWADI, TELIGALLI
ANDHERI (E), MUMBAI-69
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.07.2018 PASSED IN
RA NO.23/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT
JUDGE, UDUPI ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.02.2013 PASSED IN
OS NO.14/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M., UDUPI.
-3-
RSA No. 1045 of 2019
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the appellants is absent.
2. This appeal is filed in the year 2019. The matter is
listed third time before the Court for non compliance of office
objections.
3. This Court vide order dated 03.03.2023, granted
two weeks time on payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- payable at
Registry, failing which, the matter will be listed for dismissal on
17.03.2023.
4. Inspite of the same, cost is not paid and also the
office objections are not complied with.
5. In view of the peremptory order dated 03.03.2023,
the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections
and non-payment of cost.
Sd/-
JUDGE
CP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!