Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1781 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2023
-1-
RSA No. 902 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 902 OF 2019 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI
W/O. LATE SEENA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
2. SRI. MAHESH
S/O. LATE SEENA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
3. SMT. SHALINI
D/O. LATE SEENA
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
4. SMT. NANDINI
D/O. LATE SEENA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T
Location: HIGH 5. SMT. NALINI
COURT OF D/O. LATE SEENA
KARNATAKA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
APPELLANTS 1 TO 5 ARE
RESIDENTS OF D.NO.676,
II MAIN , 10TH CROSS
B.B.GARDEN , KHILLE MOHALLA ,
MYSURU-570 004.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NANJUNDA SWAMY N., ADVOCATE)
-2-
RSA No. 902 of 2019
AND:
1. SRI NARAYANA
S/O. LATE NANJAPPA RAO
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
2. SMT. MANGALAGOWRI
D/O. LATE NANJAPPA RAO
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 ARE
RESIDING AT D.NO.679/1,
10TH CROSS, B.B.GARDEN ROAD
KHILLE MOHALLA,
MYSURU-570 004.
3. SRI JOGIAH @ SIDDAIAH
S/O. LATE SIDDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
4. SMT. KEMPAMMA
W/O. LATE NARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 3 & 4 ARE
RESIDIGN AT D.NO.676, II MAIN
10TH CROSS, B.B. GARDEN
KHILLE MOHALLA ,
MYSURU-570 004.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 R/W. ORDER 42
RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 21.12.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.383/2016 ON THE FILE
OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU DISMISSING
THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 14.08.2008 PASSED IN O.S.NO.957/2000 ON THE FILE
OF THE III ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN.) AND JMFC AT
MYSORE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
RSA No. 902 of 2019
ORDER
This Court, vide order dated 24.02.2023, taken note of
the fact that office objections are not complied with, inspite of
the matter is repeatedly listed before the Court for non-
compliance of office objections. Hence, granted two weeks
time imposing cost of Rs.1,000/- and also made it clear that, if
the cost is not paid and office objections are not complied
within two weeks, list the matter for dismissal.
However, today also, there is no representation on behalf
of the appellants and cost is not paid and office objections are
also not complied with.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of
office objections and non-payment of cost.
Sd/-
JUDGE
ST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!