Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1778 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2023
-1-
MFA No. 270 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 270 OF 2020 (ECA)
BETWEEN:
MR. DINAKAR ULLAL
S/O LATE U CHANDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
CLASS I CONTRACTOR
DEVACHAND CONSTRUCTIONS
THOKOTTU POST, PERMANOOR
ULLAL, MANGALORE TALUK
D K DISTRICT PIN-575007
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. MR. M.A.AHMED
S/O ALTE G M ABDULLA
Digitally signed AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
by
BHARATHIDEVI RESIDING AT AJJIKATTE
K KORLAHALLI
Location: High KADIMBALA VILLAGE AND POST,
Court of
Karnataka PUTTUR TALUK D K DISTRICT
PIN-574307
2. SMT MARIYAMMA
W/O M A AHMED
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
3. SMT JAMEELA
AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
-2-
MFA No. 270 of 2020
RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE
RESIDING AT AJJIKATTE,
KODIMBALA VILLAGE AND POST,
PUTTUR TALUK, D K DISTRICT -574307
4. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL PERSONAL OFFICER
SOUTHERN RAILWAYS
PALGHAT DIVISION
PALGHAT, KERALA STATE -678001
5. MR ABDULLA HAJI
CONTRACTOR
ADRUTHODU HOUSE
NEAR CHERKALA, EDAWER POST
KASARGOD TALUK
KERALA STATE-671541
6. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
REPRESENTING SOUTHERN RAILWAYS
DIVISIOANL OFFICE
MYSORE -570001
7. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER
SOUTHERN RAILWAYS
GANGE CONVERSION
REPRESENTING SOUTHER RAILWAYS
MANGALORE, D K DISTRICT
PIN-575001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. CHANDRANATH ARIGA., ADVOCATE FOR C/R3)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 30(1) OF
EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
AWARD DATED.22.07.2019, PASSED IN ECA. NO.21/2014, ON THE
FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND COMMISSIONER
FOR WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION, PUTTUR, D.K., AWARDING
-3-
MFA No. 270 of 2020
COMPENSATION OF RS.4,48,000/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE
OF 7 PERCENT P.A., FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS
REALISATION.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ORDERS THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING,
THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant who is physically
present submits that despite his instructions appellant is not
cooperating in complying with the office objections. Hence, he
is unable to comply with the office objections.
2. In the light of the above submission that the
appellant himself is said to be not cooperating in complying
with the office objections, there is no point in further
continuing the matter for compliance of office objections as the
appeal is three years old appeal.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for noncompliance of
office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE BVK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!