Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3249 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:20522
RFA No. 1835 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1835 OF 2021 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
Sri K Raghunatha Sharma
S/o Sri K C Lakshmikanth
Aged about 39 Years
No.240, 5th Cross, K G Nagar
Bengaluru - 560 019.
...Appellant
(By Sri. Prakash G R., Advocate)
AND:
Kote Shree Danvanthari Ganapathy
Temple Trust
K R Road, Fort,
Bengaluru - 560 002
Digitally signed Rep. By Its Chairman
by
BHARATHIDEVI
K KORLAHALLI Sri M Srinivasa Murthy
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
And Managing Trustee
Sri A M Sathya.
...Respondent
(By Sri. Srihari R Deshpande, Advocate)
This Regular First Appeal is filed under Order 41 Rule 1
& 2 read with Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to
call for the records in O.S.No.2948/2013 on the file of the IX
Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge, C/C. I Addl.city Civil &
Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, and set aside the judgment and
decree dated 19.08.2021, dismissing the suit and allow the
same in full, in the interest of justice granting costs throughout.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:20522
RFA No. 1835 of 2021
This Regular First Appeal coming on for Orders through
Physical Hearing/Video Conferencing, this day, the Court made
the following:
ORDER
None appear in the matter either physically or
through Video Conference.
2. On 02.06.2023, this Court has made the following
observations :
" Learned counsel for the appellant, who is physically present, prays for a week's time.
As a last opportunity, a week's time, as prayed, is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the Court may proceed to pass appropriate orders including dismissal of the appeal for noncompliance of office objections.
If the office objections are not complied within the time, registry to list the matter on 14.06.2023."
In spite of the above, the learned counsel for the
appellant has neither complied the office objections nor
shown any reasons for non-compliance of office objections
and nor even appeared in this matter. The appeal is of the
NC: 2023:KHC:20522 RFA No. 1835 of 2021
year 2021 and several and sufficient opportunities for not
less than five times have already been granted to him.
3. A perusal of the order sheet would also go to show
that the office objections which are yet to be complied
with are too simple and trivial in nature, which hardly
takes few minutes to comply and the appellant is not
evincing any interest in complying the office objections.
As such, I do not find any reason to grant further time.
As such, the Appeal stands dismissed for
non-compliance of office objections, as well as for
non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!