Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anil Dattabhau Lingade vs M/S Janki Corp Ltd
2023 Latest Caselaw 3226 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3226 Kant
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Anil Dattabhau Lingade vs M/S Janki Corp Ltd on 14 June, 2023
Bench: S Rachaiah
                                           -1-
                                                 NC: 2023:KHC:20451
                                                 CRL.RP No. 1303 of 2022




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                       DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023

                                       BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
                   CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1303 OF 2022
              BETWEEN:

              1.    ANIL DATTABHAU LINGADE
                    AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
                    S/O DATTABHAU LINGADE

              2.    MR SUNIL DATTATRAY LINGADE
                    AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
                    S/O DATTABHAU LINGADE

                    BOTH ARERESIDING AT
                    YADAVANAGAR
                    SRPF ROAD, NEW JALNA
                    MAHRASTRA-431203.

                                                          ...PETITIONERS
              (BY SRI. SRINIVASA D.C., ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by N   AND:
UMA
Location:
HIGH COURT    1.    M/S JANKI CORP LTD
OF                  A REGISTERED COMPANY
KARNATAKA
                    CORPORATE OFFICE AT NO.765
                    SECOND FLOOR
                    100 FEET ROAD
                    INDIRA NAGAR
                    BENGALURU-38
                    REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

              2.    M/S BHADRAMARUTI CONCAST (P) LTD
                    A REGISTERED COMPANY
                    HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
                              -2-
                                     NC: 2023:KHC:20451
                                     CRL.RP No. 1303 of 2022




    PLOT NO.E-12 PHASE-II
    ADDITIONAL MIDC
    JALNA 431203
    MAHARASHTRA
    REP BY ITS OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR.
                                              ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MUJTABA H.,ADVOCATE)

      THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 & 401 CR.P.C PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT PASSED IN
CRL.A.NO.25002/2022 DATED 14.09.2022 DISPOSED ON THE
FILE OF LXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BENGALURU AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT
PASSED IN CC NO 55734/2016 DATED 08.12.2021 ON THE
FILE OF XXXIV ADDL. CMM BENGALURU.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                           ORDER

The learned counsels for the respective parties have filed

an application [IA No.1/2023] under Section 147 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stating that the parties have

settled the matter.

2. Perused the averments made in the said application

at paragraphs 2(a), (b), (c) (d) and (e). The same read as

under:

"2. The petitioners and the respondent 1 are known to each other from quite long time. Under this circumstance at the intervention of the relatives,

NC: 2023:KHC:20451 CRL.RP No. 1303 of 2022

elders, friends and well-wishers of the parties, the petitioners and the respondent 1 with their free will and consent with an intention to put an end to the above litigation agreed to settle the above case amicably under the following terms and conditions:

a. The respondent 1 has agreed to receive the cheque a sum of Rs.44,29,492/- (Rupees Forty Four Lakh Twenty Nine Thousand Four Hundred and Ninety Two Only) from the petitioners towards the full and final settlement of the above case and the respondent 1 accepts that he has no other claim or liability against the petitioners or against their company M/s. Bhadramariti Concast Pvt. Ltd., in any manner whatsoever.

b. The petitioners have agreed to pay a sum of Rs.44,29,492/- (Rupees Forty Four Lakh Twenty Nine Thousand Four Hundred and Ninety Two Only) to the respondent 1 towards full and final settlement of their entire liability of them towards the respondent including the liability of the accused No.1 company M/s. Bhadramariti Concast Pvt. Ltd., and the petitioners or M/s. Bhadramariti Concast Pvt. Ltd., is not liable to pay anything to the respondent 1 except this amount.

c. The petitioners today paid a sum of Rs.44,29,492/- (Rupees Forty-Four Lakh Twenty-Nine Thousand Four Hundred and Ninety- Two Only) through RTGS/NEFT to the respondent's account No.002281400007326 (YES BANK LIMITED) towards the full and final

NC: 2023:KHC:20451 CRL.RP No. 1303 of 2022

settlement of the above case. Details of payment is as under:

Date of Value Date Transaction Reference No. Amount Transaction Description

21-04-2023 21-04-2023 Sunil S001231110015303 Rs.22,29,492/ Dattabahu Lingade

21-04-2023 21-04-2023 Anil S001231110015429 Rs.22,00,000/ Dattabahu Lingade Total Rs.44,29,492/

d. The respondent 1 has acknowledged the receipt of the said amount in the afore said manner. Thus, the accused/petitioners had discharged entire liability towards the complainant and there is no other claim or liability whatsoever in any manner between the parties.

e. The respondent 1 has admitted that the accused No.1 company i.e., M/s.Bhadramariti Concast Pvt. Ltd., is under liquidation and it has got no existence at present as such, entire liability of the accused No.1 company i.e., M/s. Bhadramariti Concast Pvt. Ltd., is discharged herewith by the petitioners under this compromise petition. As such the respondent 1 wish to withdraw the complaint against the accused No.1 also."

In terms of the averments made in the said application, it

is appropriate for this Court to allow the application.

Accordingly, the application [IA No.1/2023] filed by the learned

NC: 2023:KHC:20451 CRL.RP No. 1303 of 2022

counsels for the respective parties is allowed. Hence, the

following:

ORDER

1. The criminal revision petition stands disposed of in

terms of the settlement.

2. The Judgment of conviction and order of sentence

dated 08.12.2021 passed in CC No.55734/2016 by the

XXXIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate,

Bengaluru and its confirmation order dated 14.09.2022

in Criminal Appeal No.25002/2022 by the LXXII

Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru,

are set aside.

3. The petitioner/accused is acquitted for the offences

punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instructs Act, 1881.

4. Bail bonds executed, if any, stands cancelled

Sd/-

JUDGE

SA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter