Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2764 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 June, 2023
-1-
RFA No. 100533 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100533/2018 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT.DEVAKI W/O. SHIVANAIK NAIK,
AGE ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O AT POST: HUDALI,
TQ. AND DIST: BELAGAVI.
2. SRI MALLIKARJUN S/O. SHIVANAIK,
AGE ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: GOVT. SERVICE,
R/O: AT POST: HUDALI,
TQ. AND DIST: BELAGAVI.
3. SMT. DEEPA W/O RAMANAGOUDA PATIL,
AGE ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
R/O AT POST: MADAMGERI,
TQ: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
4. SHRI PRAKASH S/O SHIVANAIK NAIK,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE,
R/O AT POST: HUDALI,
Digitally
signed by TQ. AND DIST: BELAGAVI.
MANJANNA
E
5. SHRI SURESH S/O SHIVANAIK NAIK,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE,
R/O: AT POST: HUDALI,
TQ. AND DIST: BELAGAVI.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SUNIL S. DESAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SHRI BHIMAPPA,
S/O HANUMANTAPPA NAIK @ PATIL,
AGE ABOUT 87 YEARS, OCC: PENSIONER,
-2-
RFA No. 100533 of 2018
R/O: VANNUR VILLAGE, TQ: BAILHONGAL,
DIST: BELAGAVI.
2. SHRI MALLAPPA S/O BHIMAPPA NAIK,
AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: MADAMGERI VILLAGE,
TQ: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
3. SMT.NINGAWWA,
W/O SHIVANAIK GAJANNAVAR,
AGE ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
R/O: MUTAGA VILLAGE,
TQ AND DIST: BELAGAVI.
4. SHRI RAMESH S/O. BHIMAPPA NAIK,
AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: GOVERNMENT SERVICE,
R/O: MADAMGERI VILLAGE,
TQ: SAUDNATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH
ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 05.02.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.69/2016 ON
THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BAILHONGAL,
DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE
POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellants is absent. There is
no representation even after the matter is passed over
twice and again called out at 02:45 PM.
Office objections are not complied with inspite of the
matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for
RFA No. 100533 of 2018
the 6th time. Order sheet dated 25.05.2023 reads as
under:
"Learned counsel for the appellants is absent. No
representation even after the matter is passed over twice. The appeal is of the year 2018. Office has raised several objections and the same are not complied with though the matter is listed for non-compliance of office objection for the 5th time. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter.
However, to afford final opportunity, list this matter on 01.06.2023."
In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for
default i.e. for non-prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE
RH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!