Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4829 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:25741
RSA No. 1725 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1725 OF 2011 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. N. BASAVARAJE URS (ALIAS)
NARAYANARAJE URS,
S/O LATE SRI. VEERARAJE URS,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
2. SRI. PUTTARAJE URS,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
S/O BASAVARAJE URS,
3. SMT. CHANDRAMATHA AMMANNI,
W/O SRI. RAJE URS AND
D/O SRI. KRISHNARAJE URS,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
4. SMT. NINRAJ AMMANNI,
Digitally signed by W/O SRI. PUTTASOMRAJ URS,
LAKSHMINARAYANA
MURTHY RAJASHRI SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF SRI. RAMACHANDRARAJE URS,
KARNATAKA
S/O SRI. PUTTARAJE URS,
ALL THE APPELLANTS 1 TO 5 ARE
R/AT MAVANOOR VILLAGE,
SALIGRAMA HOBLI, K. R. NAGAR TALUK,
MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 604.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. L. S. CHIKKANAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:25741
RSA No. 1725 of 2011
AND:
1. SRI. PUTTA NAIKA ,
S/O LATE SRI. MARI NAIKA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
2. SRI. SHIVANNA NAIKA,
S/O LATE SRI. MARI NAIKA ,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
3. SRI. SWAMY NAIKA,
S/O LATE SRI. MARI NAIKA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
ALL THE RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE
R/AT MAVANOOR VILLAGE,
SALIGRAMA HOBLI, K.R.NAGAR TALUK,
MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 604.
4. SRI. SANNAPPA NAIKA,
S/O LATE SRI. PUTTA NAIKA,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
R/AT MAVANOOR VILLAGE,
SALIGRAMA HOBLI,
K.R.NAGAR TALUK,
MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 604.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRITHVIRAJ SHASTRY G, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. G. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE FOR R1-3;
R4-SERVED, VIDE ORDER DATED.26.06.2013 R5 IS DELETED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.4.2011 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.344/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
JMFC., K.R.NAGAR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.6.2005 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.88/1992 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) &
JMFC., K.R.NAGAR.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:25741
RSA No. 1725 of 2011
JUDGMENT
In spite of giving sufficient opportunity, no steps
were taken to bring the legal representatives of appellant
Nos.1 to 3 and respondent Nos.1 to 3. Appellant Nos.1 to
3 and respondent Nos.1 to 3 died long back. It is also
stated that appellant No.4 Sri.Ramachandraraje Urs also
died in the year 2019.
2. Hence, the appeal is abated so far as appellant
Nos.1 to 4 and respondent Nos.1 to 3 are concerned.
3. Thus, there are no other persons representing
the appellants. Therefore, as all the appellants are dead
and steps are not taken to bring their legal
representatives, the appeal stands dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SMC
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!