Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4657 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:25122
RFA No. 1712 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1712 OF 2015 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. AKTAR BAIG
S/O. LATE HYDER BAIG,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
RESIDING AT: THANISANDRA,
DR. SHIVARAM KARANTH NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560 077.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI MOHAN BHAT, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1. SRI. V. GOVINDA REDDY
S/O. LATE M.C. VENKATA REDDY,
Digitally signed AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
by
DHANALAKSHMI R/AT NO.499, 7TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN,
MURTHY JAGADISH NAGAR, HAL 3RD STAGE,
Location: High BANGALORE-560 075.
Court of
Karnataka
SRI. T.M. MUNISWAMAPPA
S/O. MUDDAPPA LATE,
DEAD BY HIS LRS,
2. SMT. YASHODAMMA,
W/O.LATE T.M. MUNISWAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:25122
RFA No. 1712 of 2015
3. SRI. M. MURTHY
S/O. LATE T.M. MUNISWAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
4. SRI. SOMANNA
S/O. LATE T.M. MUNISWAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
5. SRI. ABRAHAM JOHN
S/O. KOSHY JOHN,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/AT NO.17, THANISANDRA,
K.R. PURAM,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
PIN-560 075.
6. SRI. T.M. LOKESH
S/O. MUDDE GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 154,
THANISANDRA VILLAGE,
BANGALORE EAST TALUK,
PIN-560 077.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G S BALAGANGADHAR FOR C/R1., ADVOCATE)
RFA FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC.,1908 AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.12.2015 PASSED IN
OS.NO.3361/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDL.CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BENGALURU (C.C.H.5), DECREEING
THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:25122
RFA No. 1712 of 2015
JUDGMENT
1. None appears for the appellant.
2. Learned counsel for caveator/respondent No.1 has
filed a memo dated 19.07.2023 stating that respondent
No.1 herein is the plaintiff before the trial Court in
O.S.No.3361/2011 and the suit filed by him for injunction
has been decreed.
3. In the meantime, the appellant/defendant No.1
herein has filed the comprehensive suit in
O.S.No.25751/2011 for declaration and injunction in
respect of very same suit schedule property against
plaintiff / defendant No.1 herein. But the trial Court
by judgment and decree dated 16.10.2019 in
O.S.No.25751/2011 has dismissed the suit and the same
attains finality. Therefore, the appeal filed by the appellant
/ defendant No.1 herein is not maintainable.
4. Memo filed by the learned counsel for caveator /
respondent No.1 is taken on record.
NC: 2023:KHC:25122 RFA No. 1712 of 2015
5. Since none appears on behalf of the appellant, the
appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!