Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri.Chepuddira Poonacha ... vs M/S Bitfox ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 4545 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4545 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 July, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Sri.Chepuddira Poonacha ... vs M/S Bitfox ... on 17 July, 2023
Bench: J.M.Khazi
                                             -1-
                                                    CRL.A No. 604 of 2023
                                                        NC: 2023:KHC:24742




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2023

                                           BEFORE
                            THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
                             CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.604 OF 2023
                   BETWEEN:

                        SRI. CHEPUDDIRA POONACHA MUTHANNA
                        RETD. COLONEL,
                        S/O LATE POONACHA,
                        AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
                        R/AT HOME ESTATE ATHUR VILLAGE
                        AND POST (VIA) POLLIBETTA
                        VIRAJPET TALUK
                        KODAGU DISTRICT
                                                                 ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. HARSHA G, ADVOCATE FOR
                       SRI. SACHIN B S, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   M/S. BITFOX ENTERPRISES/PROPRIETORSHIP/
                        PRIVATE LIMITED
Digitally signed
by REKHA R              THROUGH THE DIRECTOR/
Location: High          AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES
Court of
Karnataka
                        SMT. DURGI
                        DIRECTOR/ PROPRIETRESS/
                        AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE,
                        M/T BITFOX ENTERPRISES/PROPRIETORSHIP/
                        PRIVATE LIMITED

                   2.   SRI. OM SANWARIA
                        DIRECTOR/PROPRIETOR/
                        AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

                        M/S. BITFOX ENTERPRISES/ PROPRIETORSHIP/
                        PRIVATE LIMITED
                              -2-
                                   CRL.A No. 604 of 2023
                                           NC: 2023:KHC:24742




    BOTH OF THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2
    R/AT G-202, KONARK ORCHID
    VAGHOLI, PUNE - 412 207, MAHARASHTRA

    ALSO AT:

    CITY VISTA, 15A, FOURTH FLOOR,
    FOUNTAIN ROAD, KHARADI
    PUNE - 411 014, MAHARASHTRA

    ALSO AT:

    A-16, MADIPUR COLONY,
    WEST DELHI - 110 063
                                                 ...RESPONDENTS

     THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 10.02.2023 IN PCR NO.395/2021 ON THE FILE
OF THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PONNAMPET, AND
CONSEQUENTLY    RESTORE    THE  COMPLIANT    IN  PCR
NO.395/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC PONNAMPET, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                        JUDGMENT

This appeal is by the complainant, challenging the

dismissal of the complaint filed by him against

respondents/accused for the offence punishable under

Section 138 of N.I.Act, contending that the cheques issued

by the respondents/accused towards repayment of legally

recoverable debt came to be dishonored. After issuing

CRL.A No. 604 of 2023 NC: 2023:KHC:24742

legal notice and on failure of respondents/accused to pay

the amount due, he filed complaint under Section 200

Cr.P.C. The trial Court posted the matter for sworn

statement of complainant. Due to his ill health,

complainant could not appear before the Court and record

his sworn statement. On 10.02.2023, the trial Court

dismissed the complaint for default. The absence of

complainant was not intentional. If the complaint is not

restored, complainant would be put to great hardship and

prays to allow the appeal.

2. Heard arguments and perused the record.

3. It is the case of the complainant that

respondents being the Directors/Proprietors/Authorized

representative of M/s Bit Fox Enterprises are wholesale

purchasers of I-phones. Their business method is to take

investments from individuals, purchase I-phones at

wholesale rates and sell to retail dealers with huge profit.

With that profit, money invested be returned along with

goods such as washing machines, laptops, computers,

CRL.A No. 604 of 2023 NC: 2023:KHC:24742

electronic items, mobile phones, two wheelers and cars or

cash back schemes. In this regard complainant invested

Rs.5. lakhs, which was promised to be repaid with profit of

Rs.50,000/-. During 2020, complainant expressed his

interest in purchasing a car worth Rs.48 lakhs. He was

promised that accused would arrange for a cash back in a

month and delivery of car within two months. Accordingly,

complainant remitted Rs.48 lakhs. However, accused have

neither returned the money nor delivered the car. When

insisted upon, accused have issued cheque for Rs.48

lakhs, under the signature of accused No.1. However,

when presented, the same was dishonored for insufficient

funds.

4. From the order sheet it is evident that from

18.08.2022, five adjournments have been granted for

sworn statement of the complainant. Ultimately, on

10.02.2023, the complaint was dismissed for default, on

the ground that the complainant has not turned up.

CRL.A No. 604 of 2023 NC: 2023:KHC:24742

5. It is being challenged in the present appeal

contending that due to ill health, he could not appear. It

appears complainant is a retired Colonel. When complaint

was filed he is shown to be 60 years. Even though no

documents are produced to show that when the complaint

was dismissed, the complainant was suffering from ill

health, having regard to the fact that the cheque amount

is Rs.48 lakhs, this Court is of the considered opinion that

one more chance be given to the complainant to prosecute

the complaint. Since by the time complaint was dismissed,

accused had not appeared, no prejudice would be caused

to them. Of course they would get reasonable opportunity

to prove their defence.

6. For the above reasons, the impugned order is

liable to be set aside and matter requires remand for

disposal in accordance with law and accordingly, I proceed

to pass the following:

ORDER

(i) Appeal is allowed.

CRL.A No. 604 of 2023 NC: 2023:KHC:24742

(ii) The impugned order dated 10.02.2023 passed

in PCR.No.395/2021 on the file of Civil Judge &

JMFC., Ponnampet, Kodagu-Madikeri District is

set aside.

(ii) The complainant is directed to appear before

the trial Court on 21.08.2023 without waiting

for further notice from the trial Court.

(iii) The trial Court is directed to decide the case in

accordance with law, after providing reasonable

opportunity to both parties.

Sd/-

JUDGE

RR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter