Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4209 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 July, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:23635-DB
COMAP No.98 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.98 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. KOMALA S.P.
Digitally
signed by D/O SRINIVASAPURA PRAKASH
RUPA V AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/A NO.36/1, 2ND FLOOR
Location:
High Court 11TH CROSS, IT MAIN, IST STAGE
of Karnataka INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560038
...APPELLANT
(BY MS. OSHIN VARGHESE, ADV., FOR
MR. ACHAPPA P.B. ADV.,)
AND:
1. SMT. ASHA .L @ ASHA CHETAN KUMAR
W/O SRI CHETAN KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 31 YEAR
R/AT. NO.14, KHB COLONY, JB KAVAL
CORPORATION WARD NO.10
KRISHNANANDA NAGAR
BEHIND POLICE QUARTERS
BANGALORE-560096.
2. MR. KHADEER ABDUL MOHAMMAD ALI
S/O ABDUL KHADEER
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
R/A NO.29, ERUMAPALAYAM
SALEM, TAMILNADU-636015
...RESPONDENTS
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:23635-DB
COMAP No.98 of 2023
THIS COMAP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1-A) OF THE
COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO CALL FOR
RECORDS IN COM.O.S.NO.945 OF 2021 PENDING ON THE
FILES OF THE LXXXVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
COURT AT BANGALORE. SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
09.01.2023 PASSED ON IA NO.7 IN COM.OS.NO.945/2021
PASSED BY LXXXVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
COURT AT BANGALORE WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-
A AND ALLOW I.A. NO.7 FILED BY THE APPELLANT INVOKING
ORDER XXXVII RULE 3(6)(b) OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,
1908 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B AND CONSEQUENTLY
DIRECT SECURITY BY WAY OF DEPOSIT OR BANK GUARANTEE
BY R1 IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal under Section 13(1-A) of the
Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as
'the Act') has been filed against an order dated
09.01.2023 by which application filed by the respondent
No.2 under Order XXXVII Rule 3(6)(b) of the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908, has been rejected.
2. The aforesaid order is not an appealable order
under the provisions of Order XLIII of the Code of Civil
Procedure. Therefore, in view of the proviso to Section
NC: 2023:KHC:23635-DB COMAP No.98 of 2023
13(1-A) of the Act, appeal filed under the provisions of
the Act does not lie.
Office is directed to return the certified copy of
impugned order to the learned counsel for the appellant
on substitution thereof by a photo copy.
3. The appeal is therefore dismissed with liberty to
the appellant to take recourse to such remedy as may
be available to her in law.
Consequently, pending interlocutory application is
also dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
RV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!