Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4058 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC-D:6812
CRL.A No. 100238 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANIL B KATTI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 100238 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
M. SHIVANNA, S/O LATE KARIBASAPPA,
AGE. 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. KALAPUR VILLAGE, KOTTURU TALUK,
VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT, PINCODE-583134.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. BASAVANA GOUD T, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
KOTTURU POLICE STATION, KOTTURU,
VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT,
Digitally
RPTD BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
signed by J
MAMATHA
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
J
MAMATHA Date: DHARWAD-580011.
2023.07.10
18:28:55
+0530
2. HULUGAPPA S/O LATE RAMAPPA,
AGED 42 YEARS,
R/O. KALAPUR VILLAGE, KOTTURU TALUK,
VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT,
PIN CODE-583134.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN UPPAR, HCGP FOR R1
R2 SERVED)
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC-D:6812
CRL.A No. 100238 of 2023
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14 A (2) OF
SC AND ST (POA) ACT, 1989 SEEKING TO GRANT AN ANTICIPATORY
BAIL TO THE APPELLANT WHO IS ACCUSED NO.19 IN SPL CASE
NO.225/2023 IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST, BY SETTING ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 20.04.2023, PASSED BY THE I
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BALLARI IN CRL.
MISC. NO.260/2023, ONLY WITH RESPECT TO THE APPELLANT IS
CONCERNED FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 143, 147, 148, 149,
448, 324, 354, 427, 504, 506 OF IPC., AND UNDER SECTION 3(1)(r),
3(1)(s), 3(w)-(ii) 3(2)(v-a) OF THE SC AND ST (PREVENTION OF
ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989, IN CRIME NO. 10/2023 REGISTERED BY
THE KOTTURU POLICE STATION, (CHARGE SHEET NO.29/2023, SPL.
CASE NO.225/2023, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BALLARI.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Appellant/accused No.19 feeling aggrieved by rejection of
Anticipatory Bail application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
on the file I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ballari in
Crl.Misc.No.260/2023, dated 20.4.2023, preferred this appeal.
2. Parties to the appeal are referred with their ranks as
assigned in the trial Court for the sake of convenience.
3. The factual matrix leading to the case of
prosecution can be stated in nutshell to the effect that on
28.1.2023 at 4.30 p.m. thousands of vehicle commuters staged
a rally in their motorcycles, cars etc., with kesari colour flag
embedded with the emblem of lord Shiva and were proceeding
NC: 2023:KHC-D:6812 CRL.A No. 100238 of 2023
towards Kottur town via Kalapur village cross. At that time,
some miscreants from the said rally entered Kalapur village
equipped with stones and clubs and started pelting stones and
caused damage to houses and vehicles. On account of pelting
stones, the daughter of complainant, who was sleeping in the
house sustained injuries on her both knees. On these
allegations made in the complaint, case was registered in
Kottur police station crime No.10/2023 for the offences
punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 448, 324, 354,
427, 504, 506 of IPC and under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s),
3(w)(ii), 3(2)(v-a) of the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities)
Amendment Act (for short the Act). On the aforementioned
allegations made in the complaint, the investigating officer on
completion of investigation filed charge sheet.
4. The appellant has approached the trial Court for
grant of Anticipatory bail in Crl.Misc.No.26/2023 on the file of I
Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Ballari. The trial Court by its
order dated 20.4.2023 rejected the Anticipatory bail petition of
the present appellant and granted bail to other petitioners. The
same has been challenged by the appellant in the present
appeal.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:6812 CRL.A No. 100238 of 2023
5. Learned HCGP filed objections contending that there
are sufficient material evidence against the appellant. The trial
Court after recording the submission of the complainant and
being unsatisfied with overt act of appellant/accused No.19 has
rightly rejected the Anticipatory bail application of appellant.
There is legal bar in terms of Section 18 of the Act to maintain
Anticipatory bail petition filed in terms of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
Therefore, prayed for dismissal of the appeal.
6. Heard the arguments of both sides.
7. On perusal of complaint allegations and documents
produced by learned counsel for appellant, it would go to show
that on 28.1.2023 at 4.30 p.m. thousands of vehicle
commuters staged a rally in their motorcycles, cars etc., with
kesari colour flag embedded with the emblem of lord Shiva and
were proceeding towards Kottur town via Kalapur village cross.
The said group started pelting stones and caused damage to
the vehicles and properties of villagers. Due to pelting of
stones, daughter of complainant suffered injuries. When group
of persons in rally started pelting stones, it is difficult to find
out who has pelted stones on the sleeping daughter of
NC: 2023:KHC-D:6812 CRL.A No. 100238 of 2023
complainant, which caused injuries to both legs, further
damage to the vehicle and door of the house of complainant.
Therefore, the trial Court by relying on the judgment of Honb'le
Apex Court in Prathvi Raj Chauhan V/s. Union of India and
others, reported in (2020) 4 SCC 727 has held that in the
absence of there being prima facie case, attracting penal action
in terms of Section 3(2)(v-a) of the SC and ST Act held that bar
contemplated under Section 18 of the Act will not come in the
way of considering Anticipatory bail petition filed by the present
appellant and others in Crl.Mis.No.260/2023. In fact, the
question of Section 3(2)(v-a) of the SC and ST would come into
play only when schedule offences are proved and the same has
to be considered while imposing sentence. The trial Court on
the basis of submission of complainant, who appeared in
response to notice that he has personally seen the
appellant/accused No.19 named M.Shivanna S/o Late
Karibasappa has dropped big size stone on the leg of his
daughter, damaged his auto rickshwa with stones and also
broken the front door of their house with stones and on
recording of such submission of the complainant, Anticipatory
bail application of appellant came to be rejected.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:6812 CRL.A No. 100238 of 2023
8. On going through the material produced by
appellant, further statement of complainant, wife of the
complainant and injured daughter, it would go to show that
they have generally stated, due to pelting of stones, the
daughter of complainant sustained injuries, so also the vehicle
and door of the house was damaged. Similarly 164 of Cr.P.C
statement of victim and sister of complainant is also on the
same line and they have never stated in their statement that
appellant/accused No.19 has dropped big size stone on the leg
of the daughter of complainant, due to which she sustained
injuries. There is no any material evidence to substantiate the
statement of injured complainant recorded by the trial Court as
observed in paragraph of 4 of it's order. Indisputably, FIR is
registered against unknown persons. Whether
appellant/accused No.19 is one amongst group members, who
pelted stones and caused damage to door of the house and
vehicle of the complainant, so also caused injuries to daughter
of the complainant, is a matter of trial. The apprehension of
the learned HCGP can be met by imposing proper conditions.
Consequently, proceed to pass the following:
NC: 2023:KHC-D:6812 CRL.A No. 100238 of 2023
ORDER
Appeal filed by appellant/accused No.19 is hereby
allowed.
The order of the trial Court on the file I Addl. District and
Sessions Judge, Ballari in Crl.Misc.No.260/2023, dated
20.4.2023, rejecting the Anticipatory bail petition of
appellant/accused No.19 is hereby set aside.
The appellant/accused No.19 in the event of his arrest, is
directed to be released on bail, on executing personal bond for
a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for like-sum amount
subject to following conditions:
i) Appellant/accused No.19 shall appear before the trial Court on every date of hearing, unless otherwise exempted by the Court for valid reasons.
ii) Appellant/accused No.19 shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior permission of trial Court.
iii) Appellant/accused No.19 shall produce address proof document of himself and that of his surety.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:6812 CRL.A No. 100238 of 2023
iv) Appellant/accused No.19 shall
appear before the investigating officer, if called for the propose of investigation.
(Sd/-) JUDGE
VB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!