Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 890 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2023
-1-
CRL.A No. 1675 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR
AMARANNAVAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1675 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
GAJENDRA
S/O MANI
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
R/AT SIDDLIPURA, NEAR BUS STOP,
KARAKUCHI PO, TARIKERE TALUK
CHICKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT
KARNATAKA.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI GANESHA K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY LAKKAVALLI POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY H.C.G.P
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU - 560 001.
Digitally signed by
SANDHYA S 2. UMESHANAYAKA
Location: High S/O MANJANAYAKA
Court of Karnataka AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
3. SHRUTHI
W/O NAGARAJANAYAKA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
-2-
CRL.A No. 1675 of 2022
4. KUMARANAYAKA
S/O BALYANAYAKA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.
5. SAROJA BAI
W/O MANJANAYAKA.
6. MANJANAYAKA
S/O BALYANAYAKA
THE RESPONDENT No.2 to 3 ARE
R/AT SIDDLIPURA KARAKUCHI PO
TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMGALURU.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S VISHWAMURTHY, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER IN CRL.MISC.No.784/2022
(CR.No.75/2022) DATED 01.09.2022 PASSED BY THE 1ST
ADDL.SESSIONS AND SPL. JUDGE AT CHIKKAMAGALURU AND
DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER
ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.75/2022
REGISTERED BY LAKKAVALLI P.S., UNDER SEC.149, 307, 323,
324, 341, 354, 427, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND UNDER
SEC.3(1)(r)(s) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT PENDING BEFORE THE 1st
ADDL.SESSIONS AND SPL.JUDGE, AT CHIKKAMAGALURU.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed memo
seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The memo reads thus:
CRL.A No. 1675 of 2022
"The petitioner humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdrawal the above matter as `Not Pressed' as the above criminal appeal became infructuous as petitioner is arrested by Respondent police, with liberty to file fresh petition and to return the certified copies (original documents). Hence, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the same in the interest of justice and equity."
2. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as not
pressed. Registry is directed to return the original
documents to the learned counsel for the appellant.
Sd/-
JUDGE
LRS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!