Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 883 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO.17945 OF 2022 (GM-MMS)
BETWEEN:
M/S SRI. LAKSHMI SRINIVAS STONE INDUSTRY
A PROPRIETOR CONCERN
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
HOUSE NO 2670/13, PRAGATHI NILAYA
OPPOSITE DEVARAMMANAHALLI LAYOUT
MALLIKARJUNA TEMPLE
NANJANGUD TOWN,
NANJANGUD TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT 571301
REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR
SRI P HEMACHANDRA
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUNIL S. RAO, ADVOCTE FOR
SRI. T. SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPT. OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
REP. BY SECRETARY
VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU 560001
2
2. THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
NO 04, GAGANACHUMBI JODI ROAD
KUVEMPUNAGAR,
MYSORE 572102
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KRISHNARAJA BOULEVARD ROAD
MYSURU DISTRICT,
MYSORE 570001
4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
No. 04, GAGANACHUMBI JODI ROAD
KUVEMPUNAGAR
MYSORE 572102.
5. THE DISTRICT TASK FORCE (MINES) COMMITTEE
HEADED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
MYSURU AS ITS CHAIRMAN
O/O THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
MYSURU KRISHNARAJA BOULEVARD ROAD
MYSURU DISTRICT
MYSURU 570001
6. SRI H S DINESH
S/O SRI H M SWAMY AND LATE P S SUVARNA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
RESIDING AT HIRIKATI VILLAGE
CHIKKATI POST
BEGURU HOBLI
GUNDLUPET TLAUK
CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT
MYSURU 571313
....RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.S. MAHENDRA, AGA FOR R1 TO R5
SRI. S.M. BABU, ADVOCATE FOR R6))
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
3
ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR
ORDER, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
30.08.2022 ONE PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 IN
CASE NO. GaBhuE/HeBhuMy/HIMBARAHA/791/2022-23 TO
THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE, MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
By way of present petition, an order of the
respondent-authority in the nature of endorsement dated
30.08.2022, whereby the application of the petitioner for
crushing unit was kept in abeyance, is challenged. As
the application was kept in abeyance, the authority in the
endorsement referred to certain proceedings, namely, an
order passed by the learned Civil Judge,
Chamarajanagar, and an appeal in R.A.No.11/2014.
2. At this stage, the learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that the appeal was decided and the
said order was subjected to further challenge in the
second appeal. The learned counsel, on instructions,
further submits that vide the judgment passed in the
second appeal, the matter was remitted back to the First
Appellate Court for decision afresh.
3. In view of these facts, at the most, we can
dispose of this appeal as dismissed with liberty to the
petitioner to take appropriate steps in the pending appeal
by submitting an application, etc., if so advised.
4. With these observations and liberty, the petition
is dismissed.
In view of disposal of the writ petition, pending
IAs., if any, do not survive for consideration and are
accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
RD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!