Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 678 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2023
-1-
RFA No. 1701 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1701 OF 2006 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. SHRI PITCHANNA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
2. SHRI KUPPANNA @ KUPPUSWAMY
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
ALL SONS OF SHRI.PULLAPPA
R/AT NO.3/1, DOOPANAHALLI
BANGALORE-560 038
3. SHRI VENKATASWAMY
SINCE DECEASED BY LRS
a SMT N.GIRIJA
W/O LATE VENKATASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
b. MASTER KIRAN KUMAR
S/O LATE VENKATASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS
Digitally c. MISS SHRUTHI
signed by D/O LATE VENKATASWAMY
PANKAJA S
Location:
AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS
HIGH BOTH ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR
COURT OF MOTHER AND NATURALGUARDIAN
KARNATAKA
R/AT NO. 2/1, 8TH CROSS,
13TH MAIN, HAL II STAGE,
DOOPANAHALLI,
BANGALORE -560 038
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. MUNIYAPPA & S.KALYAN BASAVARAJ,
ADVOCATES-ABSENT)
-2-
RFA No. 1701 of 2006
AND:
1. SMT.RAMAKKA
W/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA
2. SHRI.SRIRAMULU
S/O PULIYANNA
3. SHRI. BALACHANDRA
S/O PULIYAMMA
4. SHRI.JAYARAMU @ ABBANNA
S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA
5. SHRI RAMANNA @ DODDAKUTTI
S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA
6. SHRI.CHIKKA KUTTI
S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA
7. SHRI. MARIYAPPA
S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA
8. SHRI.SRINIVASU
S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA
9. SHRI NAGARAJU
S/O. LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.33 (NEW)
OLD NO 156, 3RD CROSS,
DOOPANAHALLY, HAL 2ND STAGE,
BANGALORE -560 038
10. THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
MAYOHALL, BANGALORE-560 001
11. THE COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
-3-
RFA No. 1701 of 2006
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE -560 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.SUMANGALA GACHCHINAMATH,
ADVOCATE FOR R10 & R11
SRI.VENUGOPAL M.S., ADVOCATE FOR C/R2 & R3 TO R9
R1- DEAD
V/O/D 3/8/2010 R4 TO R9 ARE LR'S OF DECEASED R1)
THIS RFA FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DT. 05.07.2006 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.10740/1997 0N THE FILE OF THE XXVIII ADDL. CITY
CIVIL JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE
SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND
ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. None Appears.
2. Since the appeal is of the year 2006, I find no reason to
adjourn the matter. Appeal is, therefore dismissed for non-
prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE
PKS CT:AN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!