Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 582 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2023
-1-
RFA No. 1637 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1637 OF 2012 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. K C NANJAMMA
SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS.
1(A) MRS. SUJATHA REDDY
D/O LATE K.P. VENKATA REDDY
& LATE K.C. NANJAMMA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
R/AT NO.1019, S. ALKIRE ST. LAKEWOOD
CO8O228, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA)
1(B) M/S. SUCHITRA KHAN
D/O LATE K.P.VENKATA REDDY
& LATE K.C. NANJAMMA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT B BLOCK
GF-B, CYPRUS OAK APARTMENTS
PULIYAKULAM
COIMBATORE, INDIA - 641 045.
Digitally AND
signed by
PANKAJA S PERMANENT RESIDENT OF
FF-2, MADHAV RESIDENCY
Location:
HIGH NO.44, 2ND CIRCULAR ROAD
COURT OF DOLLARS SCHEME EXTENSION
KARNATAKA NANDINI LAYOUT
BENGALURU - 560 096.
1(C) MR.K.P. VENUGOPAL REDDY
S/O LATE K.P. VENKATA REDDY
& LATE K.C. NANJAMMA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
NO.170/1 (NEW NO.1)
-2-
RFA No. 1637 of 2012
8TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS, GANESHA BLOCK
MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT
BENGALURU - 560 096.
1(D) MRS. SUNITHA REDDY KINI
D/O K.P. VENKATAREDDY
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
NO.17, CLEARSPRINGS CT
SUGARLAND, TAXAS - 77479
UNITES STATES OF AMERICA (USA)
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.N. CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI JAYADEVA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA
R/AT NO.42, 13TH CROSS
1ST BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR
BANGALORE 560 010.
2. SRI JAYARAMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA
3. SRI K J JEEVAN
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
S/O JAYARAMA REDDY
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT PRESENT NO.5/1
OLD NO.767/768/769
4TH MAIN, 'A' BLOCK, SUBRAMANYANAGAR
BANGALORE 560 010.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHANMUKHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R-2 AND R-3 SERVED)
-3-
RFA No. 1637 of 2012
THIS RFA FILED U/41 RULE 1 R/W SEC 96 OF CPC, AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT 15.02.2012 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.6084/2005 ON THE FILE OF XLIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, PARTLY DECREEING AND
PARTLY DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE
POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. Memo is filed by appellant No.1(b) seeking to withdraw the
appeal. A copy of the GPA by which appellant No.1(a), 1(c) and
1(d) have authorized appellant No.1(b) to enter into a compromise /
settlement / compound or withdraw the case is also enclosed.
2. Original GPA is also furnished to verify the same.
3. It is stated that appellant No.1(b) is authorised to withdraw
the appeal on behalf of her siblings viz., appellant Nos.1(a), 1(c)
and 1(d).
4. In view of the above, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
RFA No. 1637 of 2012
5. In view of the withdrawal of the appeal, other applications do
not survive for consideration.
SD/-
JUDGE
SV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!