Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 480 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023
-1-
RP No.5 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY
REVIEW PETITION NO.5 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. MUNIRAJU
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
S/O LATE MUNICHIKKANNA.
2. ROOPA C
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
W/O LATE KALAPPA.
3. MANUPRIYA K
AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS
D/O LATE KALLAPPA.
Digitally signed
by RUPA V
4. NIKIL K
Location: High
Court of AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS
Karnataka S/O LATE KALLAPPA.
ALL ARE R/AT
AMRUTHAHALLI VILLAGE
YELAHANKA HOBLI
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK - 560 064.
PETITIONERS NO.3 AND 4 ARE MINORS
REP. BY NATURAL GUARDIAN
PETITIONER NO.2
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. K.N. PHANINDRA, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. SAMPATH A, ADV.,)
-2-
RP No.5 of 2023
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER
KUMAR PARK WEST
BENGALURU - 560 020.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BENGALURU - 560 020.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G. AGA FOR R1)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII
RULES 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO
CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE FILE OF WA
NO.298/2022 CONNECTED WITH MAIN APPEAL WA
NO.285/2022 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. REVIEW THE ORDER
DATED 14.10.2022 IN WA NO.298/2022 (CONNECTED WITH
MAIN APPEAL WA NO.285/2022) DISPOSED OF BY THIS
HON'BLE COURT VIDE ANNEXURE-A. CONSEQUENTLY
RESTORE THE APPEAL TO ITS FILE FOR CONSIDERATION
AFRESH & ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Mr.K.N.Phanindra, learned Senior counsel for the
appellant.
RP No.5 of 2023
This review petition has been filed seeking review
of the judgment dated 14.10.2022 passed in
W.A.No.298/2022.
2. After hearing the learned Senior counsel for the
petitioner at length, we find that the judgment dated
14.10.2022 neither suffers from any jurisdictional
infirmity nor any error apparent on the face of the
record warranting interference of this Court in exercise
of review jurisdiction.
In the result, the petition fails and is hereby
dismissed.
Consequently, pending interlocutory application is
also dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE RV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!